1. The current asynchronous behavior is pointless, because we still remove the
hashtable entry synchronously, which deletes the value, and it's the value
we're using.
2. Trying to asynchronously delete the value is difficult, and not currently
needed because we can't get a memory-pressure notification while we're using
the value, and hence can't expire it from the expiration tracker.
Note: we can't get this memory-pressure notification because the stage 2 of
mozalloc_handle_oom() to reclaim memory when OOM is not implemented yet.
cbf352d0db