This marks **/docs/** as exclusively docs, and code that is autodoc'd as
inclusively docs.
That means that a change that purely modifies documentation files will *only*
run `docs` tasks, while a change that modifies autodoc'd source code will
*additionaly* run `docs` tasks. The tasks do not run by default.
MozReview-Commit-ID: G9tOK0AwtrI
This marks **/docs/** as exclusively docs, and code that is autodoc'd as
inclusively docs.
That means that a change that purely modifies documentation files will *only*
run `docs` tasks, while a change that modifies autodoc'd source code will
*additionaly* run `docs` tasks. The tasks do not run by default.
MozReview-Commit-ID: G9tOK0AwtrI
This marks **/docs/** as exclusively docs, and code that is autodoc'd as
inclusively docs.
That means that a change that purely modifies documentation files will *only*
run `docs` tasks, while a change that modifies autodoc'd source code will
*additionaly* run `docs` tasks. The tasks do not run by default.
MozReview-Commit-ID: G9tOK0AwtrI
In order to allow extensions running in a content process to connect extension
filters, we need to be able to track which requests they have permissions to
modify, and which processes they have permissions to modify them from.
This interface allows us to register channels that we've dispatched webRequest
listeners for, and the TabParent (and, by proxy, content parent) we've
dispatched them to. Extensions will only be able to filter those channels, and
only from those processes.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 46HTVeQ5ndi
This moves it to the same compartment as the code that it interfaces with the
most often, and allows for much more effective JIT optimizations.
MozReview-Commit-ID: FZcogI4d4rv
Bill, can you please review the binding changes? Shane, can you please review
the policy service?
This is the first step to making extension policy data directly available to
C++ code without any COM overhead. It tracks the set of currently active
extensions, and how they map to add-on IDs and URIs.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 9Z61AXFll3P
Bill, can you please review the binding code and the general sanity of the
platform code? Andrew and zombie, can you please review the policy logic and
tests?
As in part 1, this aims to reduce the overhead of our extension policy logic
by making it directly available to native code with as little JS and XPConnect
overhead as possible.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 40m1wSEYtBo
Bill, can you please review the binding code, and the general sanity of the
platform code. Andrew and zombie, can you please matching algorithms and
tests.
Change summary:
The existing JavaScript matching code works well overall, but it needs to be
called a lot, particularly from hot code paths. In most cases, the overhead of
the matching code on its own adds up enough to cause a problem. When we have
to call out to JavaScript via XPConnect to make a policy decision, it adds up
even more.
These classes solve both of these problems by a) being very fast, and b) being
accessible directly from C++. They are particularly optimized for the common
cases where only literal or prefix matches are required, and they take special
steps to avoid virtual calls wherever possible, and caching computed URL
values so that they can be reused across many match operations without
additional overhead.
MozReview-Commit-ID: BZzPZDQRnl
