Now that rustfmt is getting close to stable, and work on the style system has died down a bit, it seemed like an opportune time to auto-format the style crates.
The first commit disables import reordering, since tidy and rustfmt don't currently agree on the correct ordering. The second commit does a bunch of manual fixups such that the output of rustfmt passes tidy. The third commit runs rustfmt on the three aforementioned crate.
There are a few dozen warnings in the style crate about lines longer than 100 characters. It would be good to fix these, but I don't have time for that now.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 9a900ef019cd643bff961d7b20db6da69f3edb29
Kinda tricky because :host only matches rules on the shadow root where the rules
come from. So we need to be careful during invalidation and style sharing.
I didn't use the non_ts_pseudo_class_list bits because as soon as we implement
the :host(..) bits we're going to need to special-case it anyway.
The general schema is the following:
* Rightmost featureless :host selectors are handled inserting them in the
host_rules hashmap. Note that we only insert featureless stuff there. We
could insert all of them and just filter during matching, but that's slightly
annoying.
* The other selectors, like non-featureless :host or what not, are added to the
normal cascade data. This is harmless, since the shadow host rules are never
matched against the host, so we know they'll just never match, and avoids
adding more special-cases.
* Featureless :host selectors to the left of a combinator are handled during
matching, in the special-case of next_element_for_combinator in selectors.
This prevents this from being more invasive, and keeps the usual fast path
slim, but it's a bit hard to match the spec and the implementation.
We could keep a copy of the SelectorIter instead in the matching context to
make the handling of featureless-ness explicit in match_non_ts_pseudo_class,
but we'd still need the special-case anyway, so I'm not fond of it.
* We take advantage of one thing that makes this sound. As you may have
noticed, if you had `root` element which is a ShadowRoot, and you matched
something like `div:host` against it, using a MatchingContext with
current_host == root, we'd incorrectly report a match. But this is impossible
due to the following constraints:
* Shadow root rules aren't matched against the host during styling (except
these featureless selectors).
* DOM APIs' current_host needs to be the _containing_ host, not the element
itself if you're a Shadow host.
Bug: 992245
Reviewed-by: xidorn
MozReview-Commit-ID: KayYNfTXb5h
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: cb754b262747e7cab794411df55588f0f0b30b5e
Don't use it yet (since I was working from a Servo tree). Will hook it up and improve in the Gecko bug.
Right now it takes a `StyleRuleCascadeData`, which means that if all the origins in the document have state selectors we could do just one walk over the tree and not multiple, that will be improved.
Other than that, this is completely untested of course, but I prefer to land it, given I don't think it's complex, and work on the Gecko integration separately. The reason for this is that I also plan to fix the `<slot>` bugs, which will change `StyleRuleCascadeData` and such, and I want the two bugs to conflict as little as possible.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 50e4171958d4ff7f1c76d133a8f89e7d5995376f
Right now we go through a lot of hoops to see if we ever see a relevant link.
However, that information is not needed: if the element is a link, we'll always
need to compute its visited style because its its own relevant link.
If the element inherits from a link, we need to also compute the visited style
anyway.
So the "has a relevant link been found" is pretty useless when we know what are
we inheriting from.
The branches at the beginning of matches_complex_selector_internal were
affecting performance, and there are no good reasons to keep them.
I've verified that this passes all the visited tests in mozilla central, and
that the test-cases too-flaky to be landed still pass.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 7a8733723551201d2c06acde9b0915b4c03938b4
This will help Xidorn implement tree pseudos, and in general makes sense,
allowing to put specific matching data in a selectors implementation.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 6268f482084179ed54e63028da038ae39c947359
This type is a lot of complexity related to a very specific thing such as the
hover and active quirk.
Instead of that, move `nesting_level` to `MatchingContext`, and simplify all
this computing whether the quirk applies upfront, for each complex selector we
test.
This is less error-prone, and also allows simplifying more stuff in a bit.
Also, this makes the hover and active quirk work in Servo with no extra effort.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: a200fb4b9df4e7461b4238fe3a6d49881f438e25
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
Automatically verify that derive() lists are alphabetically ordered #18172
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [X] These changes fix#18172 (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [X] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because _____
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 474369618965569407d127b1e8c481e757cc59d3
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
The Tokenizer, defined in the file `async_html.rs` will run on the main thread, while h5e's `Tokenizer`(along with its Sink) lives on the parser thread. Both h5e's `Tokenizer` and `Sink` communicate with the main thread Tokenizer via their own mpsc channels. The Sink keeps sending parser operations to the main thread, to be executed. For some operations, it waits for a message from the main thread before returning.
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [ ] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [ ] These changes fix #__ (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because _____
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: e8272dcf1a316549cdbc98a16c181c02743041c4
