Usually, Web developers set this property on block formatting contexts
in order to avoid running into floats, and we can use this as a
speculation hint.
Fixes the width of the search box on the Google SERPs.
r? @mbrubeck
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 19d466b06250f10169e88fc7f0b447c7f2f8209e
Several issues are addressed in this commit:
* Inline flows now bubble up their absolute descendants instead of
making the inline flow the containing block for them. (In the future,
we will need to make the inline flow *sometimes* be the containing
block for them, but for now it improves sites to unconditionally
bubble up.)
* Fragments now look at their inline fragment context to determine
whether they are positioned.
* Inline flows now push the stacking-relative position of the absolute
containing block down to their inline-block fragments.
* Inline absolute hypothetical fragments can be containing blocks.
* Fixes the logic in
`containing_block_range_for_flow_surrounding_fragment_at_index`. The
condition to determine whether fragments are positioned was inverted!
* `Descendants`/`AbsDescendants` has been refactored in order to become
more friendly to inline absolute containing blocks in the future.
Improves the inline position of the green drop-down arrow in the Google
SERPs. (The block position is still wrong.)
r? @mbrubeck
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: d654841288ad6c7d4f8d7da3c68d04ef7df2c241
Known issues:
* Display list optimization can sometimes optimize out elements that
should be shown. This affects the Enyo demo.
* The `overflow: scroll` container doesn't clip the inner layer properly
when borders, border radius, etc. are present.
* `overflow-x: scroll` and `overflow-y: scroll` don't work individually;
elements are scrolled all at once.
Note that multiple layers per stacking context aren't needed for the Enyo demo; rather the issue is that the height of the main area is being calculated incorrectly. (It looks like JS is measuring the height and poking in an explicit value that is too tall.)
r? @glennw
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: b05b02e11fb849e1f0153d009d8fcf0501ace8dc
The failing `float-applies-to-*` CSS 2.1 tests never really should have
been passing in the first place; they depend on floats inside
fixed-layout tables working properly, which they don't.
Closes#6078.
Closes#6709.
Closes#6858.
r? @mbrubeck
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 1ddef2997abf51716835017225b282f8a9077cce
It's not possible to correctly determine during the css cascade whether the container height
is explicitly specified. Additionally, the spec https://drafts.csswg.org/css2/visudet.html#the-height-property says this should affect the *used* height, rather than the computed height.
This significantly improves the layout in #6643.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 028707f5cd3263fd1476669207f67d5b9d5d4806
It's not quite done but can probably be reviewed anyway.
I still need to finish up a few of the ToCss impls, I just got lazy and wanted to make sure things worked.
The computation of the used values is definitely not right, I'm going to investigate that.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: acbca7b3aaf18866f7a1a79d9684149897bf4305
Sorry for not doing it yesterday, I couldn't.
cc @metajack @SimonSapin
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 4ebb95ccd8e034007eacb447a054919ef4af2bf7
This reverts commit 945adab / PR #6033.
The CSS Working Group resolved to drop this value from the spec:
http://log.csswg.org/irc.w3.org/css/2015-05-20/#e555680
The group was unable to come up with even a theoretical use case. Gecko only implemented this value for completeness. Other browsers vendors have clearly expressed they have no interest in implementing this.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 300c36f250f7838d8008d800644dc466bcd90a72
This improves Servo's performance on large pages.
Please double-check the logic when it comes to nested layers—I'm sure I've messed up some of the geometry calculations :)
r? @glennw
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 0880e54f987bac7c34c934ef6ee36f46475b06e3
This fixes panics in RTL pages with floats (#6113) and partially fixes the positioning of RTL floats. There are some remaining issues with the layout of floats in RTL flows, which I'll file follow-up issues for.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 360c5d8235ae6fb5c51fba391be92c6cafe88425
`BaseFlow::position` is relative to the parent flow's margin box in the inline direction. We need to use the parent's `position` as the container size when translating it to physical coordinates, or we get incorrect results for non-LTR content.
r? @pcwalton
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 5a737bae1afd9dc48762a34fc041826e6d016e49
Makes qz.com visible.
In order to work around a compiler bug involving Sized, this patch moves
`store_overflow` to be a virtual method.
r? @glennw
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 5a13cae064c4418923fe35bb7e07c71f5bfd851e
Table columns should be layed out according to the 'direction' property of the
table flow, regardless of the 'direction' property of any table-row,
table-rowgroup, etc. flows.
This fixes a number of the `direction-applies-to-*` tests in the CSS2.1 test
suite.
This also simplifies `propagate_column_inline_sizes_to_child` by separating
the code used for table cells from the code for non-cell flows.
r? @pcwalton
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 844ac2915eab6573c43e7648cfa94cc2d97fa901
* Stop double-counting border and padding for inline-block fragments.
(Test case: `inline_block_border_intrinsic_size_a.html`.)
* Take clearance into account when determining intrinsic widths of
blocks containing floats.
Improves the Amazon headers.
r? @mbrubeck
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 7b87085c1880c60aa3be5b3ec4572a0d93fd5537
* Fix queries involving stacking contexts
* The code was double accumulating stacking context origins.
* Handle queries of inline elements.
* The node addresses being compared were incorrect (CharacterData vs. Span)
* Handle ScriptQuery reflows correctly.
* The layout task was skipping the compute absolute positions traversal, so failed before window.onload.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 5f6a740190e1e5912d84162c92c6b79365df165a
This add some properties to the style system and a new flow type, but the larger issues of dealing with fragmentation in the flow tree is still an open question.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 1e150140bd12624ad357e3168fb496079fb8ec7c
They haven't been used for hypothetical box calculation in quite some
time.
r? @glennw
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 0a4db7ae0f581a959863bd5159766795c6caf8d8
Fixes#5300, which it is a rebase of.
Known issues:
* Collapsed borders do not correctly affect the border-box of the table
itself.
* The content widths of all cells in a column and the content height of
all cells in a row is the same in this patch, but not in Gecko and
WebKit.
* Corners are not painted well. The spec does not say what to do here.
* Column spans are not handled well. The spec does not say what to do
here either.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 8a4555cc53bc1bbb21a08eb6f010cb1215034419
"Links to the multipage version of the specification are unfortunately
likely to break over time."
-- https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/asefij.html
This commit removes all references to the specific pages when viewing
WHATWG using multipage mode. I went through all these links and they
redirect fine.
Regex used to generate this commit:
`s_whatwg.org/multipage/.*#_whatwg.org/multipage/#_g`
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: d90fe2b0889dee4eb27693aca7670969d5253424
Before this change, Servo used one code path that computed the position
of flows with `position: static` or `position: relative` and another
separate code path that computed the position of flows with `position:
absolute` or `position: fixed`. The latter code attempted to duplicate
the former code to determine the static position of hypothetical boxes,
but this was both fragile and incorrect in the case of hypothetical
boxes nested inside floats. In fact, it's impossible to determine the
static position of an absolute flow relative to its containing block at
inline-size assignment time, because that static position could depend
on a float that cannot be placed until block-size assignment!
This patch changes block layout to use the same code path for static
positioning of regular flows and static positioning of absolute flows
where applicable. This both simplifies the code and improves its
efficiency, since it allows the `hypothetical_position` field and
`static_block_offsets` data structure to be removed. Moreover, it
improves correctness in the above case (which the new reftest checks).
This allows the sidebar in Facebook Timeline to be positioned properly.
r? @glennw
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: bdcf606f4802e5b1ab3ee251b45ee1e81800359a
Improves "Edit links" on the Wikipedia sidebar.
r? @mbrubeck
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 10c68e751912962ed1bbed137b00ce4511d46bda
As the float ceiling is relative to the border box, not the margin box,
of the parent flow, top margin must not be included.
This exposed a pre-existing bug whereby margins are discarded if a block
contains only floats and no content, affecting the tests
`float_intrinsic_height.html` and `margins_inside_floats_a.html`. As a
workaround, some invisible content has been added to the bodies of both
tests.
r? @mbrubeck
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 1c884dc76bef440f8ccd344fab874e2e2161683b
As far as I can tell, this is a cut-and-paste of old buggy code from
block flows. Delegating to the correct block flow code fixes the sidebar
float placement on Guardians of the Galaxy.
r? @glennw
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: f4da0f0e94259e12adeb193fd9ecf6813457b883
The speculated inline-size of the preceding floats was forced to zero at
the wrong time if the float was itself cleared, causing it to overwrite
the speculated value. Shuffling the code around a bit fixes the problem.
r? @glennw
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 07520de97047916f0d15c7a63b3de20eac50f010
I think this should have been changed in #3618 but was missed. r? @pcwalton
I wasn't able to come up with a good test case for this, partly because of other bugs related to floats and formatting contexts.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: b79d06c8d2363ebd6bdb171a943d1c932a6cea68
This fixes a bug in finding the top left corner of an RTL block in physical coordinates. (The old code used the `start` point of the `position` rect, which is not always the top left.)
It also fixes the setting of `position.start.i` in certain mixed LTR/RTL cases.
There is still a bug related to `position.size` for RTL blocks with margins. See the FIXME comments for details.
r? @pcwalton or @SimonSapin
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: b255b49e2e2246ff8bf7f8751088bfe0a0ee41a2
Table layout code has been refactored to push the spacing down to
rowgroups and rows; this will aid the implementation of
`border-collapse` as well.
r? @SimonSapin
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 8e811229bae6b338fabcd7df602079730c942889
Only simple alphabetic and numeric counter styles are supported. (This
is most of them though.)
Although this PR adds a sequential pass to layout, I verified that on
pages that contain a reasonable number of ordered lists (Reddit
`/r/rust`), the time spent in generated content resolution is dwarfed by
the time spent in the parallelizable parts of layout. So I don't expect
this to negatively affect our parallelism expect perhaps in pathological
cases.
Reconstructed from #5138 via raw diffing.
r? @SimonSapin
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: fd1bb49a65dd998c8ef9890a1576aaf62ddfdba1
