<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
PR to #11578
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [ ] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [ ] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [ ] These changes fix #__ (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because _____
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 44126da60e2494b5f59bee88833058ba1e66f811
First part of #11292, this just includes support of `[Func]`.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 073c5e3b6b8950c01c9e5691925d24787fd06d53
This was easier to throw together than per-attribute/method support, and it gets rid of some nonstandard properties from our globals.
Fixes#7626.
r? @Ms2ger
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 8255e74a61d62be94ef53caa9ebe6cd5082dcb4d
This might be a bad idea, especially on the webidl side. However, we started talking about the idea that modelines are a lint error (https://github.com/servo/servo/issues/10719), and these changes would be required before enabling a modeline lint.
If it bitrots, it's easy to recreate with
```
find * -type f -exec sed '/- Mode:/d' -i {} +
find * -type f -exec sed '/ vim:/d' -i {} +
git checkout -- python/tidy/servo_tidy/tidy.py
git checkout -- python/tidy/servo_tidy_tests/spec.webidl
git commit -a
```
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: dff217c2e3ff0b77eeebf62d36c2bf57c044cf14
Extracted this out of #5649
This commit was created with the following commands:
```
find . -iname "*.webidl" -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' 's/http:\(.*\)whatwg.org/https:\1whatwg.org/g'
```
```
find . -iname "*.rs" -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' 's/http:\(.*\)whatwg.org/https:\1whatwg.org/g'
```
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 4997d3a112354a407365fede1ab1944834a2e13c
Because of #2122 I cannot write test for this right now because it will be failing randomly due to that iframe issue. However, if it doesn't fail due to that issue a test like this:
```html
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="utf8" />
<script src="harness.js"></script>
<title>Iframe contentDocument test.</title>
</head>
<body>
<iframe src="test_iframe_contentDocument_inner.html" id="iframe"></iframe>
<script>
waitForExplicitFinish();
var timeout = 100;
var iframe = document.getElementById('iframe');
function test_contentWindow() {
if (!iframe.contentWindow) {
// Iframe not loaded yet, try again.
// No load event for iframe, insert bug number here.
setTimeout(test_contentWindow, timeout);
return;
}
is(iframe.contentDocument.getElementById('test').textContent, 'value');
finish();
}
test_contentWindow();
</script>
</body>
</html>
```
where inner is simply:
```html
<html><body><div id="test">value</div></body></html>
```
passes.
I have added `SameOrigin` method to the `UrlHelper`. I wanted to reuse it in [`constellation.rs` same_script check](f0184a2d01/components/compositing/constellation.rs (L625)) but I it didn't want to compile saying
```
error: unresolved import `dom::urlhelper::UrlHelper`. Maybe a missing `extern crate dom`?
```
So I didn't include it in this PR for now.
There is more discussion about the cross origin iframes in [another issue](https://github.com/servo/servo/issues/3939). In this PR I just added same origin check.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 85a2f0b66a32cfd6022b3e6cec6ec06f3b59baf1
