This happens asynchronously, just as it does in non-WebRender mode.
This functionality is a prerequisite for doing proper display-list-based
hit testing in WebRender, since it moves the scroll offsets into Servo
(and, specifically, into the script thread, enabling iframe event
forwarding) instead of keeping them private to WebRender.
Requires servo/webrender_traits#55 and servo/webrender#277.
Partially addresses #11108.
r? @glennw
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 27d1f182713077395426a53a9c91ec35c95887ee
Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data:
- [X ] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X ] `./mach test-tidy --faster` does not report any errors
- [X ] These changes fix#11320 (github issue number if applicable).
Either:
- [X] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because _____
Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 2f9796fa696e9514280777398467696dd4f004b3
This is the first part of #10185. More to follow. I have built this locally with both servo and geckolib without errors; let's see if it succeeds on all platforms as well.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 639fdd6b128e0cfd418e4ae0dd78de3f5aecac4c
The old code tried to do the speculation as a single bottom-up pass
after intrinsic inline-size calculation, which was unable to handle
cases like this:
<div>
<div style="float: left">Foo</div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="overflow: hidden">Bar</div>
</div>
No single bottom-up pass could possibly handle this case, because the
inline-size of the float flowing out of the "Foo" block could never make
it down to the "Bar" block, where it is needed for speculation.
On the pages I tried, this regresses layout performance by 1%-2%.
I first noticed this breaking some pages, like the Google SERPs, several
months ago.
r? @mbrubeck
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 1554331f06900e69f246ed9986a08aae91a0a71e
This allows geckolib to pass gecko style structs and have the style system write to them directly, provided we implement all the traits.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 605842f193aedc1151ab38a99c49f693c76e5cf3
Flat display lists were a 2x regression on the spheres demo. This patch series fixes that.
See the individual commits for more details.
r? @mrobinson
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 55fc48e4c46917a0f036d0054fac296bb5719434
Instead of producing a tree of stacking contexts, display list
generation now produces a flat list of display items and a tree of
stacking contexts. This will eventually allow display list construction
to produce and modify WebRender vertex buffers directly, removing the
overhead of display list conversion. This change also moves
layerization of the display list to the paint thread, since it isn't
currently useful for WebRender.
To accomplish this, display list generation now takes three passes of
the flow tree:
1. Calculation of absolute positions.
2. Collection of a tree of stacking contexts.
3. Creation of a list of display items.
After collection of display items, they are sorted based upon the index
of their parent stacking contexts and their position in CSS 2.1
Appendeix E stacking order.
This is a big change, but it actually simplifies display list generation.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 62814f7cb486bc267a796b7ce58c51d59240fad0
Two related fixes for border-collapse:
* Fix border collapsing across table-row-group flows
This fixes the border-end calculation for table rows whose borders are collapsed with rows in different rowgroups. The border collapsing code now uses an iterator that yields all the rows as a flat sequence, regardless of how they are grouped in rowgroups. It gets rid of `TableRowGroupFlow::preliminary_collapsed_borders` which was never correct. (It was read but never written.)
This may fix#8120 but I'm not 100% certain. (I haven't managed to reproduce the intermittent failure locally, and my reduced test case still fails but in a different way.)
* Fix confusing `push_or_mutate` API
This fixes a bug when recalculating border collapsing for an existing table row. The bug was caused by using `push_or_mutate` which has no effect if there is already a value at the specified index.
The fix switches incorrect `push_or_mutate` calls to use `push_or_set` instead. It also renames `push_or_mutate` to `get_mut_or_push` which I think is a less-confusing name for this method.
r? @pcwalton
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 1d6aece589410e13d9773d702f4426d3e197155c
Use the PrintTree utility to improve the readability of flow tree
dumps. Blocks and fragments are now split over two dump levels, because
otherwise they are impenetrable. Also start printing the restyle damage of
fragments.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: a2330f494316926dca9f64431d8357a093143d7d
This flag is no longer necessary, because stacking contexts can now
create layers lazily for content that needs to be stacked above a
layer. This should reduce the number of layers on pages, hopefully
reducing overdraw.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: acc0bf68736d6e4aee2e370bf91fc2465415aa6e
Also include absolutely positioned elements in the overflow rect calculation.
Fixes#7797.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: ca56ebbb09f3c258d10e7a7fa276d42fe258d893
Elided almost all the lifetimes and removed needless returns. Mostly done by sed + manual fixes.
r? @nox
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: c2c2646d37614ece5869af861993c3d619f6e003
This is #7185 with one commit added to make it build merged with master, which got support for the `ch` unit in the meantime.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: a547ae6826cf171c42b090408a4c20d58d1829d9
This necessitated changing overflow to be calculated by the parent flow
if relatively positioned children are present. That is because the
overflow regions cannot be calculated without knowing relative offsets,
which themselves cannot be calculated without knowing the parent size
(because of percentages). To accomplish this without sacrificing
parallelism in the non-relative case, this patch splits overflow into
"early" and "late" computation. Late overflow computation cannot be
parallelized across children, while early overflow computation can.
Makes the "Apple Music" text show up over the full-bleed promotional
background on apple.com.
r? @SimonSapin -- would appreciate a look over the iframe test case that was changed.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: dcaf66397a06246b9b4fdca3a10af1508a11f1e8
There is no need to compute next_collapsed_borders_in_block_direction for all kind of flows when it's used only in the table row case. That also avoids a panic when the next child is a table colgroup (this should not happen when iterating over a table row).
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 3d0951cf256ec07b427eaa2305b85da7a7645359
The failing `float-applies-to-*` CSS 2.1 tests never really should have
been passing in the first place; they depend on floats inside
fixed-layout tables working properly, which they don't.
Closes#6078.
Closes#6709.
Closes#6858.
r? @mbrubeck
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 1ddef2997abf51716835017225b282f8a9077cce
This was the preferred pattern between the deprecation of Vec::from_elem and
the addition of the count argument to the vec![] macro.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 556c0e1509cb48b90f492bcf0f25d0ed14b015d1
Sorry for not doing it yesterday, I couldn't.
cc @metajack @SimonSapin
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 4ebb95ccd8e034007eacb447a054919ef4af2bf7
This improves Servo's performance on large pages.
Please double-check the logic when it comes to nested layers—I'm sure I've messed up some of the geometry calculations :)
r? @glennw
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 0880e54f987bac7c34c934ef6ee36f46475b06e3
Table columns should be layed out according to the 'direction' property of the
table flow, regardless of the 'direction' property of any table-row,
table-rowgroup, etc. flows.
This fixes a number of the `direction-applies-to-*` tests in the CSS2.1 test
suite.
This also simplifies `propagate_column_inline_sizes_to_child` by separating
the code used for table cells from the code for non-cell flows.
r? @pcwalton
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 844ac2915eab6573c43e7648cfa94cc2d97fa901
This add some properties to the style system and a new flow type, but the larger issues of dealing with fragmentation in the flow tree is still an open question.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 1e150140bd12624ad357e3168fb496079fb8ec7c
This was seen in Twitter and the Google SERPs (sometimes).
r? @mbrubeck
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: b6fc83cf2b4b426548bb9d10e9493f2b111bd617
Fixes#5300, which it is a rebase of.
Known issues:
* Collapsed borders do not correctly affect the border-box of the table
itself.
* The content widths of all cells in a column and the content height of
all cells in a row is the same in this patch, but not in Gecko and
WebKit.
* Corners are not painted well. The spec does not say what to do here.
* Column spans are not handled well. The spec does not say what to do
here either.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 8a4555cc53bc1bbb21a08eb6f010cb1215034419
Before this change, Servo used one code path that computed the position
of flows with `position: static` or `position: relative` and another
separate code path that computed the position of flows with `position:
absolute` or `position: fixed`. The latter code attempted to duplicate
the former code to determine the static position of hypothetical boxes,
but this was both fragile and incorrect in the case of hypothetical
boxes nested inside floats. In fact, it's impossible to determine the
static position of an absolute flow relative to its containing block at
inline-size assignment time, because that static position could depend
on a float that cannot be placed until block-size assignment!
This patch changes block layout to use the same code path for static
positioning of regular flows and static positioning of absolute flows
where applicable. This both simplifies the code and improves its
efficiency, since it allows the `hypothetical_position` field and
`static_block_offsets` data structure to be removed. Moreover, it
improves correctness in the above case (which the new reftest checks).
This allows the sidebar in Facebook Timeline to be positioned properly.
r? @glennw
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: bdcf606f4802e5b1ab3ee251b45ee1e81800359a
This fixes a bug in finding the top left corner of an RTL block in physical coordinates. (The old code used the `start` point of the `position` rect, which is not always the top left.)
It also fixes the setting of `position.start.i` in certain mixed LTR/RTL cases.
There is still a bug related to `position.size` for RTL blocks with margins. See the FIXME comments for details.
r? @pcwalton or @SimonSapin
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: b255b49e2e2246ff8bf7f8751088bfe0a0ee41a2
Table layout code has been refactored to push the spacing down to
rowgroups and rows; this will aid the implementation of
`border-collapse` as well.
r? @SimonSapin
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 8e811229bae6b338fabcd7df602079730c942889
