It appears that neither Chrome, Safari or Edge support this feature,
and it's causing web-compat issues for us, e.g. bug 1373417.
MozReview-Commit-ID: AP5LMgL6QmR
This patch does the following renamings, which increase consistency.
- GeckoProfilerInitRAII -> AutoProfilerInit
- GeckoProfilerThread{Sleep,Wake}RAII -> AutoProfilerThread{Sleep,Wake}
- GeckoProfilerTracingRAII -> AutoProfilerTracing
- AutoProfilerRegister -> AutoProfilerRegisterThread
- ProfilerStackFrameRAII -> AutoProfilerLabel
- nsJSUtils::mProfilerRAII -> nsJSUtils::mAutoProfilerLabel
Plus a few other minor ones (e.g. local variables).
The patch also add MOZ_GUARD_OBJECT macros to all the profiler RAII classes
that lack them, and does some minor whitespace reformatting.
As I've said before, as module owner I prefer that MOZ_ASSERT_IF not be
used in the module because I consider it to be unreadable. However, a
few uses have crept in, and this patch removes them.
I consider it to be unreadable because the name looks like a name that
uses smalltalk-ish naming conventions, i.e., with a part of the name
corresponding to each parameter, in order. However, the parameters are
in the order opposite the name.
This was written primarily with the vim commands:
:%s/MOZ_ASSERT_IF(\([^,]*\),/MOZ_ASSERT(!\1 ||/
:wn
followed by manual cleanup for indentation and removal of !!.
MozReview-Commit-ID: G6rLbOn7k8d
I plan to use it for now to force a full document restyle when a standalone rule
changes or something like that.
In practice, we can do better sometimes, and we may just want to propagate to
the StyleSet all the style change notifications in order to have access to the
rule that changed and all that...
But for now this seemed easier than adding other four or five functions to
StyleSetHandle.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 2BEIliGu4mO
I plan to use it for now to force a full document restyle when a standalone rule
changes or something like that.
In practice, we can do better sometimes, and we may just want to propagate to
the StyleSet all the style change notifications in order to have access to the
rule that changed and all that...
But for now this seemed easier than adding other four or five functions to
StyleSetHandle.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 2BEIliGu4mO
The ignore-root-scroll-frame flag is generally needed on Fennec, or possibly
other zoom-enabled platforms, when we have them. It allows hit-testing things
outside the main thread's notion of what is visible, because that might occur
when the user zooms out.
For largely historical reasons, we are passing this flag around in other scenarios,
such as when doing hit-tests for touch events, because in the past touch events
and zooming only happened on Fennec, so it didn't matter. Now that we have
touch events enabled on other platforms, such as Windows, we need to make the
distinction clearer.
MozReview-Commit-ID: BlHjtjFYgzv
The difference is that PostRestyleEventForCSSRuleChanges sets
mRestyleForCSSRuleChanges true. In a subsequent patch,
we propagate a new TraversalRestyleBehavior flag to servo side
if mRestyleForCSSRuleChanges is true.
MozReview-Commit-ID: IKsBbm09uT9
We need to request an animation-only restyle to force flush all throttled
animations on main thread when we handle an event with coordinates
(e.g. mouse event).
MozReview-Commit-ID: KkjeQVsLgTl
This patch aims to speed up the lookup and storage of DisplayItemData objects, by removing a level of indirection and preventing the previously required hashtable lookup in order to access these. Instead it stores an array of pointers on each frame that allows direct access to the DisplayItemData object by dereferencing the frame. Since most frames get either 1 or 2 DisplayItemData objects attached to them a specialized class is used that is of minimal size (2 * sizeof(void)) and that performs well for sizes 1 or 2.
MozReview-Commit-ID: HONKAmpk5H8
There are situations where events may be handled out-of-order. Allow
coalescing to happen backwards in time as well as forwards to cover them.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 3k7vNFxE1cz
This patch aims to speed up the lookup and storage of DisplayItemData objects, by removing a level of indirection and preventing the previously required hashtable lookup in order to access these. Instead it stores an array of pointers on each frame that allows direct access to the DisplayItemData object by dereferencing the frame. Since most frames get either 1 or 2 DisplayItemData objects attached to them a specialized class is used that is of minimal size (2 * sizeof(void)) and that performs well for sizes 1 or 2.
MozReview-Commit-ID: HONKAmpk5H8
The call that's causing the crash seems to be [1], that is, we're trying to
recreate frames for the root element, which should always have a frame created
at the initialization of the PresShell.
So the function I removed in that bug had something like the following:
if (!mDidInitialize) {
// Nothing to do here. In fact, if we proceed and aContent is the
// root we will crash.
return NS_OK;
}
Which PostRecreateFramesFor doesn't guard against (because I thought it was not
needed, per tryserver results).
Sounds a lot like we do need that check, though I'd like to have a testcase
where it happens :(
[1]: http://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/rev/3dc6ceb42746ab40f1441e1e659ffb8f62ae78e3/layout/base/nsCSSFrameConstructor.cpp#2420
MozReview-Commit-ID: Lh6SohNmmI6
Say there's a single lag event, a GC or a busy loop, during which the user
types several characters.
Is this one (lag) event? Several (input) events?
We have INPUT_EVENT_RESPONSE_MS which will accumulate several lagged events in
this case. However, that is more of an indication of how users use Firefox than
how good we've been at eliminating sources of lag.
INPUT_EVENT_RESPONSE_COALESCED_MS records the coalesced time spend waiting for
responses to input events. So in this case it will record one value for the
entire duration of the lag.
MozReview-Commit-ID: H5rYnhwF0q3
This also moves the NoteStyleSheetsChanged to RecordStylesheetChange, which
makes more sense, and stopped special-casing author styles, since it's not
needed now.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 9WKFa0JxqlU
It's not only inefficient, but also prone to buggyness. Since styles may not be
up-to-date when it happens.
Post a reconstruct instead, which ensures a style flush happens before running
frame construction.
MozReview-Commit-ID: DrakHsJv5fY
Signed-off-by: Emilio Cobos Álvarez <emilio@crisal.io>
