For layers-full mode, we set the backface-visibility to visible because
visibility would be handled by FLB and layers.
MozReview-Commit-ID: CUbeUabfC7K
nsReflowStatus::IsEmpty() assertions are added after DISPLAY_REFLOW in the
beginning of the Reflow().
A few Reflow() implementations have Reset() calls at the end which are left
in place by this patch (with an explanatory comment added to each). These
ending Reset()s are only needed for cases where a non-splittable frame
passes its own nsReflowStatus to a child's reflow method. Just in case the
child leaves a "not fully complete" value in the nsReflowStatus, the
non-splittable parent frame must clear out the nsReflowStatus before
returning, so that its own parent doesn't then try to split it.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 6Jj3jfMAqj4
In the printing preview, we create continuous table frame if table is too
long to containing in a page. But the default value of
NeedToCalcHasBCBorders is false which means we don't calculate
HasBCBorders for continuous table frame. Thus, the border collapse is
not shown when printing preview.
MozReview-Commit-ID: IqhLSYuWj30
Before this change, we used eColGroupContent for both colgroups created by table-column-group elements and anonymous colgroups wrapping table-column elements. eColGroupAnonymousCell was used for colgroups created to handle cells that are not in any other colgroup already. eColGroupAnonymousCol was unused.
In our UA sheet the only style we apply to ::-moz-table-column is "display: table-column".
Per spec, the only styles that apply to table columns are border props,
background props, 'width', and 'visibility'.
The only one of those that inherits is 'visibility'. And the only relevant
value per spec is "collapse". But an anonymous column can only be "visibility:
collapse" in Gecko right now if its colgroup is, and then the colgroup will get
collapsed away as a whole. So it doesn't matter whether the column inherits the
visibility style.
In practice, we do something special for "hidden" on a table-column as well,
during display list building, which affects hit-testing. Per
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1763 it's not clear that we should be
doing this at all, but for now we just keep our existing behavior and ensure
that the parent colgroup's visibility style is taken into account for anonymous
columns when building display lists.
There's no real reason to restrict this to LayerSize, since we use
use Layer and LayoutDevice coordinate spaces interchangeably for
webrender. With the templating of the function the compiler doesn't know
what type to use for {0, 0} so I added a new function to deal with that.
MozReview-Commit-ID: BA83Sy9UjYH
There's no real reason to restrict this to LayerSize, since we use
use Layer and LayoutDevice coordinate spaces interchangeably for
webrender. With the templating of the function the compiler doesn't know
what type to use for {0, 0} so I added a new function to deal with that.
MozReview-Commit-ID: KyabB6P6LiA
Before bug 929484, border-radius on row groups, rows, column groups,
or columns don't apply to the background of each cell, yet the
border-radius on the cell itself does. After bug 929484, the behaviors
changed. In this patch, I tried to revert the behaviors of border-radius
on table row groups, rows, column groups, or columns back to
what happened before bug 929484.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 1Xg1qHde3lk
