Commit Graph

7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Florian Quèze
91f7a2ef3a Bug 1331599 - script-generated patch to replace removeEventListener calls with the once option when possible, r=jaws. 2017-01-25 07:01:52 +01:00
Florian Quèze
63de711857 Bug 1331081 - script generated patch to omit addEventListener/removeEventListener's third parameter when it's false, r=jaws. 2017-01-17 11:50:25 +01:00
Hiroyuki Ikezoe
c3f55afdb3 Bug 1310096 - Replace the wait for the second MozAfterPaint with rAF callback to avoid intermittent failure on Android. r=boris
MozReview-Commit-ID: AamMljHkbM4
2016-10-19 14:41:50 +09:00
Hiroyuki Ikezoe
0d6fbdaea1 Bug 1278136 - Part 5: Create a stacking context for opacity/transform animations even if it's in delay phase and even if the property is overridden by !important rules. r=birtles
This patch introduces a new functions named HasEffectiveAnimationOfProperty.
This function checks that a given CSS property is overridden by !important
rules.
On the other hand, now KeyframeEffetReadOnly::HasAnimationOfProperty() does
just check that the effect has a given CSS property.  This is used to create
a stacking context because we should create a stacking context for opacity or
transform animations even if the property is overridden by !important rules.

Note about no-stacking-context-(opacity|transform)-removing-animation-in-delay.html
Before this patch we don't create any stacking context for animations overridden
by !important rules, but after this patch we do create a stacking context for
such animations.  As a result, in the test case we did paint a stacking context
in the first rAF callback and then in the second rAF callback we did clear the
painted stacking context. Unfortunately sometimes the second rAF callback was
called prior to clear the stacking context on the compositor because of
compositor delay. To avoid this situation, we have to wait for MozAfterPaint
instead of rAF callback.

MozReview-Commit-ID: AG1Y0IgoB3U
2016-10-13 16:54:25 +09:00
Hiroyuki Ikezoe
dfb634646c Bug 1278136 - Part 4: Tests to check stacking context for correct effect in cascading rule. r=birtles, bz
These tests aim to confirm that part 5 does not cause any regressons.

MozReview-Commit-ID: BtZ1OGiilmQ
2016-10-12 09:59:02 +09:00
Phil Ringnalda
2ab744056c Backed out 2 changesets (bug 1278136) for failures in no-stacking-context-opacity-removing-animation-in-delay.html
Backed out changeset 62cf4a7d6007 (bug 1278136)
Backed out changeset 5f2db29e67ca (bug 1278136)

MozReview-Commit-ID: K9WcZFjL2XB
2016-10-11 20:40:36 -07:00
Hiroyuki Ikezoe
37765aa8ea Bug 1278136 - Part 4: Tests to check stacking context for correct effect in cascading rule. r=birtles, bz
These tests aim to confirm that part 5 does not cause any regressons.
Adding this bunch of reftests makes a slight change in the result of
layout/reftests/bugs/395107-2.html on Android, so fuzzy-if was also
added for the test.

MozReview-Commit-ID: BtZ1OGiilmQ
2016-10-12 09:59:02 +09:00