I'm not sure as I'm new with servo but shouldn't the new function ```parse_opt_prefs``` be in ```prefs.rs``` instead of ```opts.rs``` ?
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [X] These changes fix#14842
<!-- Either: -->
- [X] There are tests for these changes OR
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 42e28bf7e59e0c7fab7163326d7374d1c4e268d1
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
This PR removes the `util` crate.
* Replaced the `spawn_named` and `clamp` functions by appropriate uses of `std:🧵:Builder::spawn`, `std::cmp::min` and `std::cmp::max`.
* Moved `opts`, `prefs` and `resource_files` into a new `config` crate.
* Moved `remutex` and `geometry` into their own crates.
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [X] These changes do not require tests because they are refactorings
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 4eb653817f87e5fb47de34356f558eb76ecbca9f
