These are interdependent patches of Bug 1341372. We let animation-only restyle also work for RESTYLE_CSS_TRANSITIONS, and check if we need to update transitions by each transition property. If it is necessary to create/replace/cancel transitions, we create a SequentialTask for CSS_TRANSITIONS.
---
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [X] These changes fix Bug 1341372
- [X] These changes do not require tests because there are tests in Gecko already.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 4d8c9c10cb011084e71a04b7d236282bf54c9fab
…ng animation-only restyle.
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
This is PR of https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1354487
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
<!-- Either: -->
- [X] These changes do not require tests because for stylo.
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 31ea4208cf1cc043e08fe7447820582007e9af30
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
This is a PR of https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1344966
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
<!-- Either: -->
- [X] These changes do not require tests because it's for stylo.
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: d77fceaf241843d0fee246c1c910072fe041a69e
Style no forced docs for the properties code and similar, but I ran out of time, and I think it's a nice improvement.
I'd appreciate a fast-ish turn-around time because this is pretty much prone to bitrot.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: bd67163438317daa711b2411ce302aaf5bf4136a
The primary idea of this patch is to ditch the rigid enum of Previous/Current
styles, and replace it with a series of indicators for the various types of
work that needs to be performed (expanding snapshots, rematching, recascading,
and damage processing). This loses us a little bit of sanity checking (since
the up-to-date-ness of our style is no longer baked into the type system), but
gives us a lot more flexibility that we'll need going forward (especially when
we separate matching from cascading). We also eliminate get_styling_mode in
favor of a method on the traversal.
This patch does a few other things as ridealongs:
* Temporarily eliminates the handling for transfering ownership of styles to the
frame. We'll need this again at some point, but for now it's causing too much
complexity for a half-implemented feature.
* Ditches TRestyleDamage, which is no longer necessary post-crate-merge, and is
a constant source of compilation failures from either needing to be imported
or being unnecessarily imported (which varies between gecko and servo).
* Expands Snapshots for the traversal root, which was missing before.
* Fixes up the skip_root stuff to avoid visiting the skipped root.
* Unifies parallel traversal and avoids spawning for a single work item.
* Adds an explicit pre_traverse step do any pre-processing and determine whether
we need to traverse at all.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: b9a8ccd775c3192e3810a1730b1d0bc2b5c9dfb6
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [ ] These changes fix #__ (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [x] These changes do not require tests because _____
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 68b1d1d2860ac6c6e8c1c0dfe46af6790ca01dc8
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
<!-- Either: -->
- [x] There are tests for these changes OR
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
This patch introduces infrastructure for the rule tree, and constructs it.
We don't use it yet, nor have good heuristics for GC'ing it, but this should not
happen anymore once we store the rule node reference in the node.
I haven't messed up with memory orders because I want to do a try run with it,
then mess with them.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: ac0475971bb24a63ca5d36d1d17e3036ddb99049
This is a continuation of the work in #13951. I'm separating it out into a separate PR since the aforementioned patch has a green try run and this one doesn't yet.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: b611e5c3b219e8f6aa9a7937aa7f5ea552762cd4
This is another chunk of work to move us toward the new incremental restyle architecture.
Eventually, we'll make a fine-grained decision at each node about what style to recompute based on the RestyleHint on the node data (along with other things). For now, we use the existence of RestyleData as a coarse-grained approximation of this.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: c8b6ece97b6eec8ac4e16a7a79a605356279cfb6
The new restyle architecture doesn't store these things in consistent places, so we need a more abstract API.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: abcc4aeaf212fc5fc5f9e15e46feba11e3e9284f
We don't need this for Gecko, and it's hard to implement in that case because
there's nowhere obvious to put it (we don't plan to create TSDs for non-dirty
nodes, and non-dirty nodes can have dirty children which require the
children_to_process atomic). There are various solutions here, but punting is
the easiest.
We'll need to rethink this if/when we need to do a bottom-up traversal for
Gecko.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 70dbfd28fa44b0cd89a0ea39a6bd1180611c5e66
This commit adds hooks to the Servo style traversal to avoid traversing all the
DOM for every restyle. Additionally it changes the behavior of the dirty flag to
be propagated top down, to prevent extra overhead when an element is dirtied.
This commit doesn't aim to change the behavior on Servo just yet, since Servo does extra job when dirtying the node related with DOM revision counters that might be necessary.
CC @asajeffrey for the DOM revision counters stuff. When a node is dirty, do all its descendants really need to increment the revision counter, or is this an unintended effect? My intuition is that this is hurting performance quite a lot for servo.
r? @bholley
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
<!-- Either: -->
- [x] These changes do not require tests because no geckolib tests yet.
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 944d371b8f0e72f6aa5465be38c0c8daeab66127
Background:
The changes to Servo code to support Stylo began in the `selectors` crate with making pseudo-elements generic, defined be the user, so that different users (such as Servo and Gecko/Stylo) could have a different set of pseudo-elements supported and parsed. Adding a trait makes sense there since `selectors` is in its own repository and has others users (or at least [one](https://github.com/SimonSapin/kuchiki)).
Then we kind of kept going with the same pattern and added a bunch of traits in the `style` crate to make everything generic, allowing Servo and Gecko/Stylo to do things differently. But we’ve also added a `gecko` Cargo feature to do conditional compilation, at first to enable or disable some CSS properties and values in the Mako templates. Since we’re doing conditional compilation anyway, it’s often easier and simpler to do it more (with `#[cfg(feature = "gecko")]` and `#[cfg(feature = "servo")]`) that to keep adding traits and making everything generic. When a type is generic, any method that we want to call on it needs to be part of some trait.
----
The first several commits move some code around, mostly from `geckolib` to `style` (with `#[cfg(feature = "gecko")]`) but otherwise don’t change much.
The following commits remove some traits and many type parameters through the `style` crate, replacing them with pairs of conditionally-compiled API-compatible items (types, methods, …).
Simplifying code is nice to make it more maintainable, but this is motivated by another change described in https://github.com/servo/servo/pull/12391#issuecomment-232183942. (Porting Servo for that change proved difficult because some code in the `style` crate was becoming generic over `String` vs `Atom`, and this PR will help make that concrete. That change, in turn, is motivated by removing geckolib’s `[replace]` override for string-cache, in order to enable using a single Cargo "workspace" in this repository.)
r? @bholley
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix #__ (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [x] These changes do not require new tests because refactoring
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 2d01d41a506bcbc7f26a2284b9f42390d6ef96ab
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
The bulk of this is adding cargo features to make derived implementations of `heapsize` and `serde` traits optional.
"Almost" because `std::intrinsics::discriminant_value` is currently unstable and doesn’t have any stable replacement that I know of. For now, this PR conditionally replaces it with `unimplemented!()`.
r? @nox
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes <s>fix</s> are part of #11815 (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [x] These changes do not <s>require tests</s> *have tests yet* because that requires https://github.com/servo/servo/issues/11806, but I still want to land this before it bitrots. (Tests should check that the build succeeds with a stable compiler.)
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 0fb5d634a007f3d0424f95569ac3f83d500d054c
This allows geckolib to pass gecko style structs and have the style system write to them directly, provided we implement all the traits.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 605842f193aedc1151ab38a99c49f693c76e5cf3
This allows, among other things, having different implementations for parsing pseudo{elements, classes} in both `ports/geckolib` and in servo.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: c11844cbf28054784c8d65781cff20045d8ee48b
This is a step towards removing the dependency of stylo on layout/.
This PR depends on #9004.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 0f5c614609fd8867a9e7c27b8a398ea7d877c714
