Implemented Step three and handled step four of obtain the resource part
of 4.2.4 The link element.
Link to spec : https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/semantics.html#concept-link-obtain
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
<!-- Either: -->
- [X] There are tests for these changes OR
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 9afd96024fc9cb3ea822e8d549f008e03177949b
Implemented response validation part of https://w3c.github.io/webappsec-subresource-integrity/.
Implemented step eighteen of the main fetch. If a request has integrity metadata, then following steps are performed
1) Wait for response body
2) If the response does not have a termination reason and response does not match request’s integrity metadata, set response and internalResponse to a network error.
Dependency updated: html5ever-atoms from 0.1.2 to 0.1.3. This will not completely fix#14523, It will implement changes related to response validation. Request validation algorithm implementation needs CSP.
I did not update any WPT-Test. In my local system, I found some assertion issue dependent on the order of execution of test-case. It would be helpful if someone could do "try" build on these changes to get wpt results.
r? @jdm
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
<!-- Either: -->
- [X] There are tests for these changes
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: f958dafcaeed643f1232a23f5c2d4f6ba141bfea
CSSOM is now starting to be useful!
Based on #14190. Only the <s>last commit</s> last two commits need review.
cc @xidorn . This doesn't change the style API, but adds useful methods.
part of #11420
This adds:
- `insertRule()` and `deleteRule()` on `CSSStyleSheet`, `CSSGroupingRule`
- `.style` getters on link and style elements
- Keyframes-backed `CSSRules` and `CSSKeyframesRule.cssRules`
- `CSSGroupingRule.cssRules`
- `prefix` and `namespaceURI` attributes of `CSSNamespaceRule`
- Fixups regarding parent stylesheets
r? @SimonSapin
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 996756687cd741ad0d30029022638bdcceecb563
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
I removed exposure in Window and Worker to some interfaces that
was not specified in the specification. Specifically:
- HTMLLinkElement.webidl
- HTMLMapElement.webidl
- HTMLMediaElement.webidl
- HTMLMetaElement.webidl
- HTMLMeterElement.webidl
- HTMLModElement.webidl
- HTMLObjectElement.webidl
- HTMLOListElement.webidl
- HTMLOptGroupElement.webidl
- HTMLOptionElement.webidl
- HTMLOutputElement.webidl
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [X] These changes partially fix#12415 (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [X] These changes do not require tests because they do not add any feature
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 4af21e3ae1676f943a9a01688fef854487bcddfc
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
PR to #11578
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [ ] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [ ] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [ ] These changes fix #__ (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because _____
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 44126da60e2494b5f59bee88833058ba1e66f811
This might be a bad idea, especially on the webidl side. However, we started talking about the idea that modelines are a lint error (https://github.com/servo/servo/issues/10719), and these changes would be required before enabling a modeline lint.
If it bitrots, it's easy to recreate with
```
find * -type f -exec sed '/- Mode:/d' -i {} +
find * -type f -exec sed '/ vim:/d' -i {} +
git checkout -- python/tidy/servo_tidy/tidy.py
git checkout -- python/tidy/servo_tidy_tests/spec.webidl
git commit -a
```
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: dff217c2e3ff0b77eeebf62d36c2bf57c044cf14
From my understanding, setting any of these will not affect any
presentational hints for the elements
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 6a21bcd9c561d728bab5220bb5b9d5058c34e8c8
Extracted this out of #5649
This commit was created with the following commands:
```
find . -iname "*.webidl" -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' 's/http:\(.*\)whatwg.org/https:\1whatwg.org/g'
```
```
find . -iname "*.rs" -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' 's/http:\(.*\)whatwg.org/https:\1whatwg.org/g'
```
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 4997d3a112354a407365fede1ab1944834a2e13c
