* Simpler image cache API for clients to use.
* Significantly fewer threads.
* One thread for image cache task (multiplexes commands, decoder threads and async resource requests).
* 4 threads for decoder worker tasks.
* Removed ReflowEvent hacks in script and layout tasks.
* Image elements pass a Trusted<T> to image cache, which is used to dirty nodes via script task. Previous use of Untrusted addresses was unsafe.
* Image requests such as background-image on layout / paint threads trigger repaint only rather than full reflow.
* Add reflow batching for when multiple images load quickly.
* Reduces the number of paints loading wikipedia from ~95 to ~35.
* Reasonably simple to add proper prefetch support in a follow up PR.
* Async loaded images always construct Image fragments now, instead of generic.
* Image fragments support the image not being present.
* Simpler implementation of synchronous image loading for reftests.
* Removed image holder.
* image.onload support.
* image NaturalWidth and NaturalHeight support.
* Updated WPT expectations.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: ac0645c2363b5a6ea3930b0857b3a27f1b6d033f
@jdm @ecoal95 I'm working on making VR happen in the Browser and I want to bring to Servo the [webVR APIs](https://github.com/MozVR/webvr-spec/blob/master/webvr.idl) we already have in Gecko. Before anything happens we need a working implementation of WebGL (and also the [fullscreen API](https://fullscreen.spec.whatwg.org/)). My implementation is very basic and probably naive (I just recently started to contribute to Servo). My patch is just a starting point:
- It only implements ```clearColor``` and ```clear``` methods of the [WebGL spec](https://www.khronos.org/registry/webgl/specs/latest/).
- It uses the readback strategy that ```canvasRenderingContext2D``` is using (The webgl task paints stuff independently on it's own buffer and the compositor task request the pixels back to the webgl task when it needs them) I'm sure there are much better ways to handle this. Latency and FPS are critical in VR so we have to figure out the fastest way to push pixels to the screen. I've read something about layerizing the canvas but I'm still not sure what that even means :)
- There's an included test you can try ```./mach run tests/ref/webgl-context/clearcolor.html```
@ecoal95 I know you'll be working on this for the next three months. With a foundation in place we will be able to make quick progress in parallel. This is exciting!
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: e4b620ea54c94e03095e4108bce94ec750416bba
Before this change, Servo used one code path that computed the position
of flows with `position: static` or `position: relative` and another
separate code path that computed the position of flows with `position:
absolute` or `position: fixed`. The latter code attempted to duplicate
the former code to determine the static position of hypothetical boxes,
but this was both fragile and incorrect in the case of hypothetical
boxes nested inside floats. In fact, it's impossible to determine the
static position of an absolute flow relative to its containing block at
inline-size assignment time, because that static position could depend
on a float that cannot be placed until block-size assignment!
This patch changes block layout to use the same code path for static
positioning of regular flows and static positioning of absolute flows
where applicable. This both simplifies the code and improves its
efficiency, since it allows the `hypothetical_position` field and
`static_block_offsets` data structure to be removed. Moreover, it
improves correctness in the above case (which the new reftest checks).
This allows the sidebar in Facebook Timeline to be positioned properly.
r? @glennw
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: bdcf606f4802e5b1ab3ee251b45ee1e81800359a
This allows things like `<sup><span>Foo</span></sup>` to work and
improves Wikipedia.
r? @glennw
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: d7b6961104b517a22e01c192d4bb6a7ad5934ce8
Basically, the easiest way to describe the effect of this change is "float placement takes line height into account". It didn't before, which could lead to lines overlapping floats or floats taking up too much vertical space.
Improves Wikipedia.
r? @glennw
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: d8507cce8c3969a08974f44a9f397e75cbe3131d
This fixes a lot of "jumpiness" and removes the `new_line_pos` stuff.
Closes#2260.
r? @mbrubeck
cc @metajack
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: d3478954fd8e3a8374104984efb91a918b5dbb7e
50% layout improvement in a photo gallery demo I'm working on.
r? @mbrubeck
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 2a9f29f3824479da357d5cded2dc0847e6854813
Table layout code has been refactored to push the spacing down to
rowgroups and rows; this will aid the implementation of
`border-collapse` as well.
r? @SimonSapin
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 8e811229bae6b338fabcd7df602079730c942889
Only simple alphabetic and numeric counter styles are supported. (This
is most of them though.)
Although this PR adds a sequential pass to layout, I verified that on
pages that contain a reasonable number of ordered lists (Reddit
`/r/rust`), the time spent in generated content resolution is dwarfed by
the time spent in the parallelizable parts of layout. So I don't expect
this to negatively affect our parallelism expect perhaps in pathological
cases.
Reconstructed from #5138 via raw diffing.
r? @SimonSapin
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: fd1bb49a65dd998c8ef9890a1576aaf62ddfdba1
...and vice-versa. This is not a complete fix for all mixed-direction layout cases, but it fixes enough problems to make some simple test cases pass, like tha attached reftest.
There are FIXME comments for many of the remaining issues. In particular, this does not yet handle RTL layout of fixed/absolute elements, nor does it completely fix the overconstrained_block reftest.
r? @SimonSapin or @pcwalton
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 2df4dd9e098671fdbe2951f6669473e7737d6ed3
Only simple alphabetic and numeric counter styles are supported. (This
is most of them though.)
Although this PR adds a sequential pass to layout, I verified that on
pages that contain a reasonable number of ordered lists (Reddit
`/r/rust`), the time spent in generated content resolution is dwarfed by
the time spent in the parallelizable parts of layout. So I don't expect
this to negatively affect our parallelism expect perhaps in pathological
cases.
Moved from #4544, because Critic.
Fixes#4544.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 5cd6316addc1acf145ed3220719387ef6ef08d2f
Inline fragments that are part of a text run don't have interior borders.
So don't draw interior borders or include them when calculating positioning.
Fixes https://github.com/servo/servo/issues/4658, where multiple text nodes that are adjacent have distinct borders.
r? @Ms2ger, @pcwalton
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: b2f099026a8c649daf063dc7e119a514c2680697
Ready for review.
Final link step on android fails, but we know how to fix it and will add it to this branch soon.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 2cc08f289ab909de44fa09a07b2c43b70ce379b9
(Still off by default. Enable with `RUST_LOG=style`.)
r? @mbrubeck
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 172aed535be3c34775824dac64ad2b91fc379ad5
CSS-TEXT-3 § 7.3.
`text-justify: distribute` is not supported.
The behavior of `text-justify: none` does not seem to match what Firefox
and Chrome do, but it seems to match the spec.
Closes#213.
r? @mbrubeck
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 7359f99f201a359aaebf334a1787d1975c9fa7d4
Only the one-value syntax is supported for now.
r? @mbrubeck
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: c8e68fa45c43856f7ffbdde25b6e68571ad288bf
The Rust style guide suggests 100, but we have too many violations in the
tree already. This check can be tightened over time.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: ee94b3e8bf659c847bda967700272f8f98fdb0cc
`background-blend-mode` is not yet supported because we don't support
multiple backgrounds yet.
r? @glennw
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: e6fe9f14092251b0d1a8c97473dda9b5d73679cd
Content of the canvas is drawn, tests/html/test_canvas.html now works.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: da400a7a453eacf6f3089cc07e5dc61f385a0909
`blur` and `drop-shadow` are not yet supported, because the
`text-shadow` PR makes some fundamental changes to blur rendering that
are needed first.
r? @mbrubeck
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: ffdbf29db28ba334e8baf8d35141b5e8ad289459
This was making `box-shadow` not show up in many cases, in particular,
but the effects were not limited to that.
r? @glennw
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 499d17f564d699e5e290e8a3859f64e7536827a7
Together these improve a large number of sites: GitHub, Reddit, Wikipedia, etc.
r? @glennw
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 63a7742d834e9ed44421baa3ce218a5eabce58bf
This property is used by approximately 55% of page loads.
To implement the line breaking behavior, the "breaking strategy" has
been cleaned up and abstracted. This should allow us to easily support
other similar properties in the future, such as `text-overflow` and
`word-break`.
r? @glennw
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 68ab18876bf4e210da26590420b9844b9cb0c92d
This adds the infrastructure necessary to support stacking contexts that
are not containing blocks for absolutely-positioned elements. Our
infrastructure did not support that before. This minor revamp actually
ended up simplifying the logic around display list building and
stacking-relative position computation for absolutely-positioned flows,
which was nice.
This will need this PR: https://github.com/servo/rust-azure/pull/112 I have not updated the Cargo.lock file yet because I want the merge commit.
r? @glennw
f? @SimonSapin
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 68c90e27970808bddcb8c8a4e782bd4405e67a5c
