Fixes the blank spaces showing up in Wikipedia.
r? @kmcallister
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 9afdce4405f0f5998c81eae83bbb527d0e95ec8e
Attempt to solve #3690
I've re-rolled the changes from https://github.com/servo/servo/pull/2610, and then doen the necessary updates to get this to compile with the current snapshot of rust.
The documentation for values I've added in the bitflag are missing, because I don't know what is the appropriate text.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: e13873bba1782580db4abe46e883b08da829cbb6
This implements the scheme described here:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/mozilla.dev.servo/sZVPSfPVfkg
This commit changes Servo to generate one display list per stacking
context instead of one display list per layer. This is purely a
refactoring; there are no functional changes. Performance is essentially
the same as before. However, there should be numerous future benefits
that this is intended to allow for:
* It makes the code simpler to understand because the "new layer needed"
vs. "no new layer needed" code paths are more consolidated.
* It makes it easy to support CSS properties that did not fit into our
previous flat display list model (without unconditionally layerizing
them):
o `opacity` should be easy to support because the stacking context
provides the higher-level grouping of display items to which opacity
is to be applied.
o `transform` can be easily supported because the stacking context
provides a place to stash the transformation matrix. This has the side
benefit of nicely separating the transformation matrix from the
clipping regions.
* The `flatten` logic is now O(1) instead of O(n) and now only needs to
be invoked for pseudo-stacking contexts (right now: just floats),
instead of for every stacking context.
* Layers are now a proper tree instead of a flat list as far as layout
is concerned, bringing us closer to a production-quality
compositing/layers framework.
* This commit opens the door to incremental display list construction at
the level of stacking contexts.
Future performance improvements could come from optimizing allocation of
display list items, and, of course, incremental display list
construction.
r? @glennw
f? @mrobinson @cgaebel
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 397d8138e7b27541faf03d9635d7648416da4a75
Instead of looking at the display tree, have ContentBox(es)Query consult
the flow tree. This allow optimizing away parts of the display tree
later. To do this we need to be more careful about how we send reflow
requests, only querying the flow tree when possible.
Fixes#3790.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: c9089c45c4b7d40419233b48a192d85a8ad71c99
This is the last PR and most of the work for the maze solver and RoboHornet.
r? @glennw
cc @cgaebel
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 035ff19e4a5995989c5fd34928af2a6690bb8062
These were showing up really high in the maze solver profile.
r? @glennw
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 9f248378f06d4de7c0df01b64e93edcc4de208cf
These should have no effect on functionality.
r? @metajack
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 4bdd9a5ec02526b9a407b23dcbf95cc570e6fa56
`layout::fragment` and `layout::block` were getting too big.
r? @mrobinson
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 01f6a8102dfbb7eaef564acf8891088011905b59
When this option is enabled, the layout task will print an error when
display list items draw outside their owning Flow's position rect. This
will make it easier to detect layout errors before they break rendering.
This is a command-line option for the moment, because we violate this
rule quite a bit still. Once all bugs causing this are fixed, we can be
more aggressive about enabling the option.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: f5ad89f927864ba4f1cbb409b8b0e3b38febef76
This also enables incremental reflow by default. \o/
r? @pcwalton
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: f6941b35e3b945f4a6dcd2cf03daa345ad2bcaed
This also adds some extra debugging infrastructure which I found useful tracking
this bug down. A regression in the br reftests is also uncovered by this patch,
which I'll work on fixing next.
EDIT: nevermind. no regression, I just tested that before a rebase.
r? @pcwalton
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: b86344b697f814b982e52f4a72c26d58c915c37b
This patch switches FlowRefs to using the Deref and DerefMut traits, instead of
the custom `get` and `get_mut` functions.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 6a11ee89de82abae9d6607a6c2890692df5259eb
Now that DOM/Flow traversals have been refactored out, the `recalc_style_for_subtree`
function in `css/matching.rs` can be removed, in lieu of just running the standard
`recalc_style_for_node` and `construct_flows` traversals sequentially. Now we
no longer have the maintenance headache of duplicating selector matching logic
in two places! \o/
This passes reftests with both default arguments, and with `-y 1`.
r? @pcwalton
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 7eaeaeeb217e7cbd083fe318863e7de4b9f38e2b
This also hides the not-yet-working parts of incremental reflow behind a runtime
flag. As I get the failing reftests passing, I'll send pull requests for them one
by one.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 56989b8dec4aa95a3b484d45f15b23f9b3daaf13
http://dbaron.org/css/intrinsic/
Column spans are not yet supported.
This effectively adds support for percentage widths, and it also fixes
many bugs, improving the layout of Google and Wikipedia.
r? @SimonSapin
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: e2d7777c41135b71293c195d2a9d7a1bc2afd0ca
This implements a general framework for legacy presentational attributes
to the DOM and style calculation, so that adding more of them later will
be straightforward.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 0aeecfc41d5f0c637960fcddf87cc2db3e5efeea
We push down clipping areas during absolute position calculation. This
makes display items into a flat list, improving cache locality. It
dramatically simplifies the code all around.
Because we need to push down clip rects even for absolutely-positioned
children of non-absolutely-positioned flows, this patch alters the
parallel traversal to compute absolute positions for
absolutely-positioned children at the same time it computes absolute
positions for other children. This doesn't seem to break anything either
in theory (since the overall order remains correct) or in practice. It
simplifies the parallel traversal code quite a bit.
See the relevant Gecko bug:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=615734
r? @mrobinson
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: fd70b366aeada7f8cb4b2457c04fd07f0ea9b143
This makes layout more idempotent, which is important for incremental
layout.
Also converts `is_root` to a set of flags and fixes a `TODO` concerning
percentage inline heights of images.
r? @glennw
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 7902ccf8507a7ec31515bfb5824dc4727564fe4d
This patch puts in the initial framework for incremental reflow. Nodes' styles
are no longer recalculated unless the node has changed.
I've been hacking on the general problem of incremental reflow for the past
couple weeks, and I've yet to get a full implementation that actually passes all
the reftests + wikipedia + cnn. Therefore, I'm going to try to land the different
parts of it one by one.
This patch only does incremental style recalc, without incremental flow
construction, inline-size bubbling, reflow, or display lists. Those will be coming
in that order as I finish them.
At least with this strategy, I can land a working version of incremental reflow,
even if not yet complete.
r? @pcwalton
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 85b277655f07db1cb99c4d3dee93804735ed0470
Although the computed `display` property of elements with `position:
absolute` is `block`, `position: absolute; display: inline` can still
behave differently from `position: absolute; display: block`. This is
because the hypothetical box for `position: absolute` can be at the
position it would have been if it had `display: inline`. CSS 2.1 §
10.3.7 describes this case in a parenthetical:
"The static-position containing block is the containing block of a
hypothetical box that would have been the first box of the element if
its specified 'position' value had been 'static' and its specified
'float' had been 'none'. (Note that due to the rules in section 9.7 this
hypothetical calculation might require also assuming a different
computed value for 'display'.)"
To handle this, I had to change both style computation and layout. For
the former, I added an internal property
`-servo-display-for-hypothetical-box`, which stores the `display` value
supplied by the author, before the computed value is calculated. Flow
construction now uses this value.
As for layout, implementing the proper behavior is tricky because the
position of an inline fragment in the inline direction cannot be
determined until height assignment, which is a parallelism hazard
because in parallel layout widths are computed before heights. However,
in this particular case we can avoid the parallelism hazard because the
inline direction of a hypothetical box only affects the layout if an
absolutely-positioned element is unconstrained in the inline direction.
Therefore, we can just lay out such absolutely-positioned elements with
a bogus inline position and fix it up once the true inline position of
the hypothetical box is computed. The name for this fix-up process is
"late computation of inline position" (and the corresponding fix-up for
the block position is called "late computation of block position").
This improves the header on /r/rust.
r? @glennw
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: f7d2fb6ff86afff7a5b674f751af9370a5a6b142
