ParseAttribute ideally would be const (see bug 1829138), but the SVG and
SMIL code is rather messy. Still, now that BeforeSetAttr can't really
fail, swapping the order of ParseAttribute and BeforeSetAttr shouldn't
really change behavior.
Sorry for the extra `virtual` keyword removal and such. I had to do this
one by hand unlike the dependent bugs, and I went a bit drive-by, lmk if
you want me to split those changes.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D176086
rg BeforeSetAttr -l | xargs sed -i 's/nsresult BeforeSetAttr/void BeforeSetAttr/g'
rg ::BeforeSetAttr -l | xargs sed -i 's/nsresult \(.*\)::BeforeSetAttr/void \1::BeforeSetAttr/g'
Plus trivial fixes, plus clang-format.
The only meaningful changes are in nsXULElement::BeforeSetAttr. Two
things could fail:
chromemargin: I removed it because we don't use the parsed attribute any
other place than here:
https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/rev/31f5847a4494b3646edabbdd7ea39cb88509afe2/dom/xul/ChromeObserver.cpp#136
And that deals just fine with it not being parsed.
usercontextid: We have a debug assertion that we don't dynamically change it.
I kept it but I don't think it's worth failing to set the attribute on release for that
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D176069
So if the submit call doesn't trigger a submission, it won't clear the existing
pending submission.
Now we allow to override the unflushed pending submission, and add some assertion to
ensure form won't submit a submission if it is in defer state or there is an
unflushed pending submission.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D121765
Add a dom/base/rust crate called just "dom" where we can share these.
Most of the changes are automatic:
s/mozilla::EventStates/mozilla::dom::ElementState/
s/EventStates/ElementState/
s/NS_EVENT_STATE_/ElementState::/
s/NS_DOCUMENT_STATE_/DocumentState::/
And so on. This requires a new cbindgen version to avoid ugly casts for
large shifts.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D148537
nsGenericHTMLFormElement doesn't implement nsIFormControl now as HTMLElement would
inherit it to be able to be added into HTMLFormElement and HTMLFieldSetElement and
support some common form feature.
So some places that call the nsIFormControl method on nsGenericHTMLFormElement
directly would need to queryInterface it to nsIFormControl first, this should be
fine as those places are not in a hot path.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D124788
During a `TextControlState` alive, `PasswordMaskData` should be alive too.
Otherwise, we cannot keep unmasked range at reframing.
Depends on D118756
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D118757
Right now, we limit the type of a username field in username-only forms to be either text or email.
This is different from what the password manager currently support in LoginHelper.isUsernameFieldType.
This is because text and email type are the most common cases for a username field, and we want to focus
on the cases that are more likely a username field.
This patch adds "DOMFormHasPossibleUsername" event to notify the password manager when a form has a possible
username field (text or email). The event works similar to the existing "DOMFormHasPassword" event.
Depends on D113797
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D113798
The other navigation that allows focus moves (window.open) already goes
through the popup blocker, so that one is fine.
I think given how weird yet conservative other browsers are, this should
be a good trade-off to avoid false positives.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D110196
This patch adds two events - `DOMFormRemoved` and `DOMInputPasswordRemoved`.
These events are notified when a form/password field is removed from
the DOM tree. When the LoginManagerChild receives the event, it calls
_onFormSubmit as the form is submitted.
This patch also adds a WeakFieldSet formlessModifiedPasswordFields to
record all the form-less password fields that users have interacted
with to track whether a formless password is removed
Depends on D106024
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D106025
This makes the naming more consistent with other functions called
Insert and/or Update. Also, it removes the ambiguity whether
Put expects that an entry already exists or not, in particular because
it differed from nsTHashtable::PutEntry in that regard.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D105473
There's no way to know whether the submission will actually be
validated, because formnovalidate on submit buttons is a thing (and even
if all the submit controls had formnovalidate, you could still submit
the form and validate it via form.submit()), so it seems better to make
these pseudo-classes not depend on this.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D105968
