Sadly calling ExtractContents and discarding the result doesn't do the right thing.
It may be worth having a CutContents method that takes an `Option<DocumentFragment>` and switch the behavior based on it, to share the code between DeleteContents and ExtractContents, like what Gecko does. Maybe a followup.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: e7b19249489eff7a7fd49bf458ee7bd681f8ad13
Some should have been `[SameObject]` instead of `[Constant]`. The rest of the changes are additional `[Constant]` and `[Pure]` extended attributes on many operations.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 61267cde63ce6c0f6433f57b3f8054886577d767
Currently, there are a few linting functions that only run on certain
filetypes (determined by the file extension). Prior to this commit, the
special cases were handled in a parent function with a conditional. This
commit changes the system so each linting function gets passed a
filename so the function can determine whether it should run or not
based on the file extension.
I also refactored flake8 linting slightly. From what I've read so far of
the code, flake8 itself will only print the results directly to stdout
(though the linter would report the quantity of errors detected).
Prior to this commit, we would let flake8 print directly to stdout and
just determine if there were >0 errors reported. This commit (sort of
hackily) temporarily captures stdout when we call flake8 so we can do
what we want with the output, allowing us to `yield` the line number
and message like we do with the other linting functions.
In my opinion, both of these changes isolate specific behaviors/checks
into their respective linting functions instead of having them handled
at a more global level.
In addition to the changes above:
* The whitespace linter now runs on WebIDL and TOML files
* The license header linter now runs on WebIDL files
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 7c8922c0c39616559b580b4a363ebe2a8c6b3ba8
Gecko doesn't really follow the spec but it seems to throw a HierarchyRequest error when parent is null.
Any ideas who I should talk to about fixing the spec to account for the null checks?
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: acf47a02cf38b5c82e7c78cc1f6660a7daa9969a
The actual boundary points are behind a Rc<_> value to let nodes be able to store weak references to them in the future.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 15c4372a8be9c2b73d9e09bd7684484e48d220e8
Extracted this out of #5649
This commit was created with the following commands:
```
find . -iname "*.webidl" -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' 's/http:\(.*\)whatwg.org/https:\1whatwg.org/g'
```
```
find . -iname "*.rs" -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' 's/http:\(.*\)whatwg.org/https:\1whatwg.org/g'
```
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 4997d3a112354a407365fede1ab1944834a2e13c
