This should be the last major hoisting necessary to use the style system standalone. \o/
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: ddc3b7942eea8328e9eb22d864d34fce572d5535
This fixes about 130 clippy lints. Let me know if i should split up the commit.
I wasn't sure about some of the changes, especially map_or instead of map(...).unwrap_or(...) and if let instead of single arm match were not always a strict improvement in my opinion, but i'll leave that decision to the reviewer :)
There are about 150 lints left which i thought were clippy bugs or i didn't know how to fix.
cc @Manishearth
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 9da739acefc7d1776bf727c8bf782eb79f241028
This is a step towards removing the dependency of stylo on layout/.
This PR depends on #9004.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 0f5c614609fd8867a9e7c27b8a398ea7d877c714
Separated layout-specific messages to the constellation out from the `ScriptMsg` enum into a `LayoutMsg` enum within `script_traits/script_msg.rs`, addresses [#8843](https://github.com/servo/servo/issues/8843).
I initially tried to move `LayoutMsg` into `layout_traits/lib.rs`, but this introduced a cyclic dependency: `layout_traits` depends on `script_traits` for the `LayoutTaskFactory` implementation, and `script_traits/script_task.rs` now depends on `LayoutMsg` for new layout channels in `InitialScriptState` and `ScriptTask`.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 941653da653a1925ade35597e97f61a6a8a0018d
Review of documentation that was missing needed.
Fixes#8833.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 7438bc0425749989b8aab084a34ff3fff2ea6679
This gets us to where we need to be in order to write a Gecko implementation of the layout wrapper and have things Just Work.
Note that this is somewhat more than we need for just running the style system. But there wasn't a clean place to cut, and I thought it was a good idea to just do a complete job on it now, which may save us effort and mismatches in the long run.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 1f732cfbb404bfd96c3ed3f71c4b9900b7ffbba2
This adds a new pair of reader-writer locks. I measured the performance
of style recalculation on Wikipedia and the overhead of the locks was
not measurable.
Closes#7816.
cc @paulrouget
r? @glennw
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 4f625d3ab67bc14b1563f90c48cf97ca59dc1a28
Use the PrintTree utility to improve the readability of flow tree
dumps. Blocks and fragments are now split over two dump levels, because
otherwise they are impenetrable. Also start printing the restyle damage of
fragments.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: a2330f494316926dca9f64431d8357a093143d7d
This means we only deal with TrustedNodeAddress in LayoutTask::handle_reflow,
which is where the safety of this usage is guaranteed (by the ScriptReflow
destructor).
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: fc54534898c9ce4cc443e6155e0004ec4edfbb1f
Multiprocess mode is enabled with the `-M` switch, and sandboxing is
enabled with the `-S` switch.
Rebase of #6884.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 8b39b9afed6ef8a3d7d3e6609fd301a37825d3e1
There's still more refactoring to do, but this is the core stuff that's most likely to bitrot.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: a5babb89a02b9b84a8cd62554a5ceef9efb0d481
I don't believe there is a case where it would make sense to drop the
ScriptReflow struct without joining the script thread. This approach should
be somewhat more robust, and avoids the code smell of a RAII guard in an
otherwise unused variable.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: db94fda10e3351c96a0df61099d2fdfa481cc62b
Stylesheets for `HTMLLinkElement`s are now loaded by the resource task, triggered by the element in question. Stylesheets are owned by the elements they're associated with, which can be `HTMLStyleElement`, `HTMLLinkElement`, and `HTMLMetaElement` (for `<meta name="viewport">).
Additionally, the quirks mode stylesheet (just as the user and user agent stylesheets a couple of commits ago), is implemented as a lazy static, loaded once per process and shared between all documents.
This all has various nice consequences:
- Stylesheet loading becomes a non-blocking operation.
- Stylesheets are removed when the element they're associated with is removed from the document.
- It'll be possible to implement the CSSOM APIs that require direct access to the stylesheets (i.e., ~ all of them).
- Various subtle correctness issues are fixed.
One piece of interesting follow-up work would be to move parsing of external stylesheets to the resource task, too. Right now, it happens in the link element once loading is complete, so blocks the script task. Moving it to the resource task would probably be fairly straight-forward as it doesn't require access to any external state.
Depends on #7979 because without that loading stylesheets asynchronously breaks lots of content.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 7ff3a17524e0e703e3ac279441729c185444be24
Always produce a DisplayList when processing nodes for display list
construction. StackingContexts are now added to the positioned content
section of DisplayLists. This makes the code a bit simpler and opens up
the possibility of producing a StackingContext in another section of
the DisplayList. This doesn't change behavior, but is a cleanup
prerequisite for proper inline stacking context support.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: da25b8c848886d2fc875008de5adcaf13d7c9e99
This was causing a bunch of tests in tests/wpt/web-platform-tests/html/semantics/embedded-content/the-canvas-element/size.attributes* to fail. They were returning "auto" instead of the correct size. They still fail because the returned size is off by a few pixels, not sure why yet. But this is more correct and may fix other failing tests.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: b6850853da5fc677ecfa15d273159371a909ac6c
After all these changes are applied, Hacker News and GitHub only repaint and reflow nodes that actually have hover styles applied when the mouse moves over them.
r? @mbrubeck
cc @bholley
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 36c5dd4c8c543ed6767fe9dd367281b292d68dba
As per #8238 I changed `layout_interface::Msg::Reflow` to store `ScriptReflow` rather than `Box<ScriptReflow>`
I ran the tests and believe everything passed but this is my first commit to the project so sorry if I messed up the protocol!
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 601169c0e5b0207805bb316b21e556f5ab67df9b
This reduces some unnecessarily tight coupling, makes it clearer what these functions do, and may help avoid bugs where we would return from such a function without updating the relevant field.
It is also a precondition for some future experimentation I'm thinking of doing with this querying design.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 3a254b7e20c37e4ce7b614abea9ebd4687c65f98
This isn't doing anything right now, and we're not even setting it properly
in dirty_impl the |dirty_subtree(self)| was causing us to hit the skip case
for step 3.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 50ec2353845bf2a3971d5b01db37d2c3741d3912
This doesn't change any functionality, but it's the first step towards removing SubpageId.
Adding this change now will allow us to gradually change over code referencing subpage id rather than in one massive PR.
Introduces a namespace for pipeline ID generation - there is a namespace for the constellation thread, and one per script thread.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 098bdb5f22500a6e856b085a1140090f63ef8645
