Now clean up damage on all fragments that belong to a Flow. This ensures
that damage does not re-propagate up to the parent Flow from the
Fragments. It also means that the flow tree dump should show a more
accurate picture of the state of the flow tree.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 1436ee5afab4ede68ab834c7d6368a7d45ede7ac
DisplayListSection, StackingLevel, and BackgroundAndBorderLevel all
represent pretty much the same thing, a particular section of the
display list. Instead of maintaining three enums which do the same
thing, just use DisplayListSection everywhere. It's a superset of the
other two and this change will make it easier to flatten the DisplayList
in the future for WebRender.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: be555a9409c949bea7287b0e21df009bce3cb328
This helps WebRender look for useless clips and optimize them out.
r? @glennw
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 58111a6420d3edded1cb66efa7c9863f1b3cdd8e
See the commit messages for details.
r? @mbrubeck
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: a0d26445c0df6361e1e8655581a09f0e0faf0818
This should be the last major hoisting necessary to use the style system standalone. \o/
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: ddc3b7942eea8328e9eb22d864d34fce572d5535
This fixes about 130 clippy lints. Let me know if i should split up the commit.
I wasn't sure about some of the changes, especially map_or instead of map(...).unwrap_or(...) and if let instead of single arm match were not always a strict improvement in my opinion, but i'll leave that decision to the reviewer :)
There are about 150 lints left which i thought were clippy bugs or i didn't know how to fix.
cc @Manishearth
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 9da739acefc7d1776bf727c8bf782eb79f241028
This is a step towards removing the dependency of stylo on layout/.
This PR depends on #9004.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 0f5c614609fd8867a9e7c27b8a398ea7d877c714
Separated layout-specific messages to the constellation out from the `ScriptMsg` enum into a `LayoutMsg` enum within `script_traits/script_msg.rs`, addresses [#8843](https://github.com/servo/servo/issues/8843).
I initially tried to move `LayoutMsg` into `layout_traits/lib.rs`, but this introduced a cyclic dependency: `layout_traits` depends on `script_traits` for the `LayoutTaskFactory` implementation, and `script_traits/script_task.rs` now depends on `LayoutMsg` for new layout channels in `InitialScriptState` and `ScriptTask`.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 941653da653a1925ade35597e97f61a6a8a0018d
@pcwalton indicated his approval for landing stuff for the servo/gecko layout integration into the tree, which will improve maintainability for that effort. Here's an initial batch.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 9412e71460990f40ea7f9706fd79fbcd4eb0670a
Issue #2009 has already been fixed and closed so we can remove this TODO
entirely.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 48388ad0369368f2d8a631a3fb1cf46892434130
Now that euclid is up-to-date this workaround is no longer necessary.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 1ddcf9463a58a2c4d9b1495cd6b0113af6a5c071
Review of documentation that was missing needed.
Fixes#8833.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 7438bc0425749989b8aab084a34ff3fff2ea6679
This is a proposed in servo/servo#8792 clean up.
Fixes#8792.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 2dbc314e2dec39b8798d4e922dd5220d32083b56
This makes the initial download for skia go from a 300 MB git repository to a 5 MB tarball. This should help with issues like #6132 and #7687.
Fix https://github.com/servo/skia/issues/70
This builds, but the at the moment causes a number of tidy errors for duplicated crates.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 8b95d7b8d860ec4c0834192083361a9fb78ddbeb
This gets us to where we need to be in order to write a Gecko implementation of the layout wrapper and have things Just Work.
Note that this is somewhat more than we need for just running the style system. But there wasn't a clean place to cut, and I thought it was a good idea to just do a complete job on it now, which may save us effort and mismatches in the long run.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 1f732cfbb404bfd96c3ed3f71c4b9900b7ffbba2
The RECONSTRUCT_FLOW restyle damage bit shouldn't apply to newly
constructed flow tree elements. It is explicitly removed for Flows, but
not for Fragments. This causes RECONSTRUCT_FLOW to bubble up to Flows
that contain any Fragments at all. Instead explicitly remove the
RECONSTRUCT_FLOW bit when creating a new Fragment.
There isn't a good way to test this currently, but all tests should
continue to pass.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: d50b87edeca45fdca1cf491e6a9a18011fe0c120
Updated string_cache to 0.2, and updated the dependencies that depend on string_cache.
Removed references to string_cache_plugin.
Import atom! and ns! from string_cache.
Replaced ns!("") by ns!().
Replaced ns!(XML) and co by ns!(xml) and co.
Replaced Atom::from_slice by Atom::from.
Replaced atom.as_slice() by &*atom.
r? @SimonSapin
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 188fa9378c103093f1f8dac24bff0d9d237fd2bc
This adds a new pair of reader-writer locks. I measured the performance
of style recalculation on Wikipedia and the overhead of the locks was
not measurable.
Closes#7816.
cc @paulrouget
r? @glennw
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 4f625d3ab67bc14b1563f90c48cf97ca59dc1a28
Use the PrintTree utility to improve the readability of flow tree
dumps. Blocks and fragments are now split over two dump levels, because
otherwise they are impenetrable. Also start printing the restyle damage of
fragments.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: a2330f494316926dca9f64431d8357a093143d7d
BUBBLE_ISIZES and REPAINT can become "stuck" on in the default Servo
configuration once they are activated. This is solved by removing these
damage bits after they no longer apply. There isn't a good way to test
this, other than noting that it doesn't break any existing CSS tests.
This will become more important in the future as the REPAINT bit is used
to implement display list patching.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 8b6bfb615a8a04177c321c4940f79f090b0a7971
Also ensure that 3d translations get layers.
Fixes#8329.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: c19b01c2f4acdccf140e65145c8915acc6fbe59c
This means we only deal with TrustedNodeAddress in LayoutTask::handle_reflow,
which is where the safety of this usage is guaranteed (by the ScriptReflow
destructor).
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: fc54534898c9ce4cc443e6155e0004ec4edfbb1f
Multiprocess mode is enabled with the `-M` switch, and sandboxing is
enabled with the `-S` switch.
Rebase of #6884.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 8b39b9afed6ef8a3d7d3e6609fd301a37825d3e1
There's still more refactoring to do, but this is the core stuff that's most likely to bitrot.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: a5babb89a02b9b84a8cd62554a5ceef9efb0d481
