When `nsContentUtils::DispatchInputEvent()` dispatches `input` event, the
editor's value was changed by somebody. In this case, it needs to update
the valid state **and** notify to update the style.
(Note that I'm not sure whether this is right approach.)
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D25029
Even less so on reframe, where it's just unsound to do so. I had to give a value
to eSetValue_Internal, since otherwise I cannot check for its presence. I can
further special-case the reframe case if you prefer.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D20133
"input" event listener may want to check HTMLInputElement.validationMessage.
However, due to moving "input" event dispatcher from
HTMLInputElement::SetUserInput() to editor, HTMLInputElement::SetValueInternal()
updates it **after** dispatching "input" event.
This patch makes nsContentUtils::DispatchInputEvent() guarantees to update
validationMessage value before dispatching every event. On the other hand,
SetValueInternal() may be called without "input" event dispatchers. Therefore,
it needs to keep updating validationMessage value in such cases.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D19126
ImageLoadingContent will take care of updating element to correct state, we don't need to do this.
Especially for HTMLImageElement, because it may not reload the image after BindToTree (
e.g. the selected source isn't changed), clearing broken state may put element into
incorrect state.
The original code seems from https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=491063#c32
for a performance reason, however I test the http://mozilla.pettay.fi/moztests/1x1image.html
again on recent codebase, I don't see difference with/without applying this patch.
The XBL binding implementation relied on nsDateTimeControlFrame to call into
its nsIDateTimeInputArea implementation. This is correct because the XBL binding
is only constructed when the element has a frame. If the value is set while the
element is hidden, the XBL binding will pick up the correct value during construction.
That is not the case for UA Widget. As it is constructed when the DOM is attached,
relying on nsDateTimeControlFrame to send an event when attributes change means
the event won't be sent to the already constructed UA Widget.
This patch fixes that by moving the event dispatching calls originating from
HTMLInputElement out of nsDateTimeControlFrame, so they will behave correctly in
the absence of the frame.
I've also moved the gut of nsDateTimeControlFrame::HasBadInput() to
DateTimeInputTypeBase::HasBadInput(). Content script should be allowed to validate
the input without the frame.
Sadly this means the XBL implementation and the UA Widget implementation
have further diverged. The complexity should go away when we could finally
remove the XBL implementation.
nsDateTimeControlFrame still dispatches a few events to UA Widget, in
AttributeChanged() and SyncDisabledState(), as they are originated from the layout.
The name of the events in AttributeChanged() are incorrect though -- I am correcting
that in this patch too.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D15601
Summary: Really sorry for the size of the patch. It's mostly automatic
s/nsIDocument/Document/ but I had to fix up in a bunch of places manually to
add the right namespacing and such.
Overall it's not a very interesting patch I think.
nsDocument.cpp turns into Document.cpp, nsIDocument.h into Document.h and
nsIDocumentInlines.h into DocumentInlines.h.
I also changed a bunch of nsCOMPtr usage to RefPtr, but not all of it.
While fixing up some of the bits I also removed some unneeded OwnerDoc() null
checks and such, but I didn't do anything riskier than that.
Cache whether an input was ever type=password so consumers can handle sites which toggle password visibility and don't want to save the value of the field.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D15145
This patch moves all UA Widget calls to helper functions in Element.cpp. The helper function AttachAndSetUAShadowRoot sets the shadow root in a runnable, so that it is in the same order of NotifyUAWidget* runnables.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D13479
This is a best effort attempt at ensuring that the adverse impact of
reformatting the entire tree over the comments would be minimal. I've used a
combination of strategies including disabling of formatting, some manual
formatting and some changes to formatting to work around some clang-format
limitations.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D13046
When editor is modified as part of user action, aFlags of
nsTextEditorState::SetValue() includes eSetValue_BySetUserInput. In this case,
TextEditor (if there is) or the method itself (if there is no editor yet)
should dispatch "input" event by themselves because we will need to initialize
InputEvents more since we're going to implement Input Event specs.
Note that even with this patch, password field stops dispatching "input" event
with call of HTMLInputElement::SetUserInput(). This is caused by a hidden bug
of TextEditRules. This will be fixed in a following patch.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D12245
Currently, a lot of code dispatch "input" event and some of them dispatch
"input" event with wrong interface and/or values. Therefore this patch
creates nsContentUtils::DispatchInputEvent() to make all of them dispatch
correct event.
Unfortunately, due to bug 1506439, we cannot set pointer to refcountable
classes of MOZ_CAN_RUN_SCRIPT method to nullptr. Therefore, this patch
creates temporary RefPtr<TextEditor> a lot even though it makes damage to
the performance if it's in a hot path.
This patch makes eEditorInput event dispatched with
InternalEditorInputEvent when "input" event should be dispatched with
dom::InputEvent. However, this patch uses WidgetEvent whose message is
eUnidentifiedEvent and setting WidgetEvent::mSpecifiedEventType to
nsGkAtoms::oninput when "input" event should be dispatched with
dom::Event because we need to keep that eEditorInput and
InternalEditorInputEvent are mapped each other.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D12244
This patch converts datetimebox.xml to datetimebox.js and loads it as a UA Widget,
while touches things here and there to make it work.
In HTMLInputElement manages the lifecycle of the datetimebox UA Widget.
It is loaded when in <input> has type date or time, or have its type switch to date or time.
nsDateTimeControlFrame is changed so that when UA Widget is enabled,
it would not generate <xul:datetimebox>.
Like bug 1483972, a check is added in nsCSSFrameConstructor::CreateGeneratedContentItem()
to make sure we don't generate pseudo content inside <input>.
Assertions in IntlUtils is changed to allow UAWidget to call the methods.
Depends on D9056
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D9057
This patch simplifies the nsIDateTimeInputArea interface, implemented by the
datetimebox bindings, to a point that is easier to convert it to dispatch events,
by doing the following:
- hasBadInput() is re-implemented in C++ in nsIDateTimeControlFrame since
C++ needs the return value synchronously.
- SetValueFromPicker() and SetPickerState() are avoided completed since they
are simply called by HTMLInputElement methods exposed to the frame
script. They are avoided by having the frame script access the NAC and call
the nsIDateTimeInputArea methods directly.
- Merge setEditAttribute() and removeEditAttribute() to updateEditAttributes()
which takes no arguments, and have the method access the attribute values by
reading the values from <input>.
This patch is a scaled-down version of the patch proposed in bug 1456833.
The event approach is only usable in UA Widget version of datetimebox because
there is no way to avoid leaking events to the document without Shadow DOM.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D9056
Allow untrusted Events and Custom events to be dispatched at disabled form element. This is for interop and some developers have asked for this.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D10000
Various places in dom/ use the pattern:
already_AddRefed<NodeInfo> ni = ...;
which is supposed to be disallowed by our static analysis code, but
isn't, for whatever reason. To fix our static analysis code, we need to
eliminate instances of the above pattern.
Unfortunately, eliminating this pattern requires restructuring how Nodes
are created. Most Node subclasses take `already_AddRefed<NodeInfo>&` in
their constructors, and a few accept `already_AddRefed<NodeInfo>&&`. We
need to enforce the latter pattern consistently, which requires changing
dozens of source files.
Since sed on multiple lines ended up being such a pain and I didn't end up
writing a script for this because I didn't think it'd end up being so boring, I
may have made a couple cleanups here and there as well...
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D2887
Mostly automatic via sed. Only parts which I touched manually (apart from a
couple ones where I fixed indentation or which had mispelled arguments) are the
callers. I may have removed a couple redundant `virtual` keywords as well when
I started to do it manually, I can revert those if wanted.
Most of them are just removing the argument, but in Element.cpp I also added an
assertion for GetBindingParent when binding the ShadowRoot's kids (the binding
parent is set from the ShadowRoot constructor, and I don't think we bind a
shadow tree during unlink or what not which could cause a behavior difference).
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D2574
MozReview-Commit-ID: 2oIgatty2HU
The change to test_bug558726.html is because we always serialize mapped
attributes after non-mapped ones. So this change is actually improving our
serialization in that test.
For number controls, nsContentUtils::IsFocusedContent doesn't really do the
right thing, because the thing it thinks is focused is the anonymous text
element inside the number control. As a result, we weren't properly updating
the state of the currently-focused number control when hitting enter in it to
submit the form.
The HTMLFormElement change is enough on its own to fix the bug. The constraint
validation change is a just-in-case.
I haven't figured out a sane way to write a reftest for this, unfortunately:
the enter key press needs to look like a real user event to trigger the
submission behavior.
This patch is an automatic replacement of s/NS_NOTREACHED/MOZ_ASSERT_UNREACHABLE/. Reindenting long lines and whitespace fixups follow in patch 6b.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 5UQVHElSpCr
This was done automatically replacing:
s/mozilla::Move/std::move/
s/ Move(/ std::move(/
s/(Move(/(std::move(/
Removing the 'using mozilla::Move;' lines.
And then with a few manual fixups, see the bug for the split series..
MozReview-Commit-ID: Jxze3adipUh
