`EventStateManager` gives up to track gesture to start a drag if mouse down
content which is stored in `mGestureDownFrameOwner` gets lost its primary frame.
When user tries to start to drag selected text in `<input>` or `<textarea>`
element, mouse down content is an anonymous node in `TextControlElement`. So,
if a reflow occurs after `mousedown` event, the anonymous `<div>` element
is replaced with new one and `EventStateManager` gives up to track it.
Therefore, this patch makes `EventStateManager` do similar things as
`nsBaseDragService`. When `nsTextControlFrame` notifies of remove/add
the anonymous nodes, `EventStateManager` tries to keep tracking gesture with
a new anonymous node.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D119488
When `nsTextControlFrame` is reframed, `TextEditor`, anonymous `<div>`, its
`Text` and the independent `Selection`s are deleted temporarily and recreated
them.
If users are dragging text in `<input>` or `<textarea>`, the drag session's
source node is set to the anonymous text node in the element and the selection
is set to the independent selection. So, if the element is reframed during a
drag, the source node is disconnected from the document and `EndDragSession`
failed to dispatch `eDragEnd` event.
Therefore, this patch makes `nsTextControlFrame` replaces the source node and
selection when it's recreated and only when the drag session's original source
node was in the text control element. For checking which text control had the
anonymous text node, this patch makes `nsTextControlFrame` replaces source
node with the `<input>` or `<textarea>` element when the frame is destroyed.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D119487
Ideally nsDateTimeControlFrame should / could inherit from
nsTextControlFrame, but this should do for now.
Test also covers the previous patch.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D110076
Should be much simpler and doesn't need to deal with the different
stuff. We already have pseudo-classes for this, :autofill and
:placeholder-shown.
I initially wrote this because this is the only limitation that forces
us to have the placeholder text as a direct child of the text control
frame. In the end I kept that as-is, but this simplification is still
worth it.
We remove dom.placeholder.show_on_focus because it doesn't behave
correctly (it doesn't match the :placeholder-shown pseudo-class and it
should). It was introduced in bug 807613 and never turned to false by
default. I suspect nobody will miss this, but if somebody complains
about it we can reintroduce it properly (handling the pref in DOM
instead, changing the right state bits).
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D108304
This should be a simpler setup. We keep every element being a direct
anon child of the text control, and special case the reflow of the
spinners / clear button, to subtract that size from the other elements.
This fixes the bug by ensuring that the editor and placeholder are sized
and positioned in exactly the same way.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D108305
This should be a simpler setup. We keep every element being a direct
anon child of the text control, and special case the reflow of the
spinners / clear button, to subtract that size from the other elements.
This fixes the bug by ensuring that the editor and placeholder are sized
and positioned in exactly the same way.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D108305
This patch adds the struct as a parameter to various functions.
The struct is cached in ReflowInput so that we don't need to pass it
down to the internal method where nsIFrame::ComputeSize() is called.
In the subsequent patches, we'll use it to revise the implementation of
flex container's flex base size resolution, and size overrides.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D101793
This patch adds the struct as a parameter to various functions.
The struct is cached in ReflowInput so that we don't need to pass it
down to the internal method where nsIFrame::ComputeSize() is called.
In the subsequent patches, we'll use it to revise the implementation of
flex container's flex base size resolution, and size overrides.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D101793
This patch adds the struct as a parameter to various functions.
The struct is cached in ReflowInput so that we don't need to pass it
down to the internal method where nsIFrame::ComputeSize() is called.
In the subsequent patches, we'll use it to revise the implementation of
flex container's flex base size resolution, and size overrides.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D101793
This removes one const_cast but also adds two new ones. I think
the new ones are reasonable - conceptually the function does not
modify the input, so the input should be const. If that input
is returned as the output then we need to strip the const because
the return value shouldn't be const (because the caller should be
free to modify it if desired).
Depends on D97622
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D97623
Similar to the optional aContainingBlockSize parameter, both border and
padding should use logical coordinates in ReflowInput::mFrame's writing
mode.
Table frames that need to override border and padding can be simplified a bit.
However, DR_init_constraints_cookie and DR_init_offsets_cookie become more
complex, but they're only for debugging. I'm not planning to update their
internal APIs.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D95369
This patch does:
1. Rename the original ComputeSizeFlags to ComputeSizeFlag (dropping the
"s"), and make it an enum class.
2. Make ComputeSizeFlags an EnumSet.
3. Adapt the users to use EnumSet's APIs.
The `Default` enum value in ComputeSizeFlag is not needed. It equals to an
empty ComputeSizeFlags.
This change shouldn't change behavior.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D89541
We still reframe for additions / removals of the attribute because that
makes us create the placeholder <div>. We could avoid it if we created
it independently of the presence of the attribute but that seems like it
could regress perf for the case where there's no placeholder attribute,
which is probably common enough.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D88724
We still reframe for additions / removals of the attribute because that
makes us create the placeholder <div>. We could avoid it if we created
it independently of the presence of the attribute but that seems like it
could regress perf for the case where there's no placeholder attribute,
which is probably common enough.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D88724
