The problem is that synchronous XMLHttpRequest requests can spin the event loop
and cause us to process dynamic module loads (by calling
JS::FinishDynamicModuleImport) when we are already inside JS::ModuleEvaluate.
The module algorithms assume that they are not reentrant.
The patch changes dyammic module load processing to happen in the same way as
async script loads (of both classic scripts and modules), which are blocked
during sync XHR by Document::SuppressEventHandling calling
ScriptLoader::AddExecuteBlocker.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D157218
This patch move the ShouldApplyDelazificationStartegy as well as the
ApplyDelazificationStrategy under FillCompileOptionsForRequest.
As not all delazification strategies are capable of handling modules yet (Bug
1760334), and do not apply to cached-stencil, we have to add extra filters to
prevent ShouldApplyDelazificationStrategy to access custom delazification mode.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D150118
This patch move the ShouldApplyDelazificationStartegy as well as the
ApplyDelazificationStrategy under FillCompileOptionsForRequest.
As not all delazification strategies are capable of handling modules yet (Bug
1760334), and do not apply to cached-stencil, we have to add extra filters to
prevent ShouldApplyDelazificationStrategy to access custom delazification mode.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D150118
This patch adds a new off-thread delazification strategy, which adds a bit of
overhead to queue function with a priority order, which put the largest function
as the first functions to be delazified.
The intent of this new strategy is to limit the usage of main-thread
delazification to the smallest function, in case where the main-thread would win
the delazification race.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D149651
This leaves the code in ScriptLoader and ScriptLoadHandler a lot more readable.
ScriptBytecodeCompressedDataLayout and ScriptBytecodeDataLayout simplify
locating data in the ScriptLoadRequest bytecode buffer when compressing and
decompressing it.
The interface is still error-prone. For example, these classes don't check
that the returned pointers are within the bounds of the buffer.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D145011
The SRI hash at the beginning of ScriptLoadRequest::mScriptBytecode is left
uncompressed because ScriptLoader::OnIncrementalData() tries to decode it
as soon as enough data is read (instead of waiting until OnStreamComplete()).
ScriptLoader writes the length of the uncompressed bytecode to the buffer
to make it easy for ScriptLoadHandler to allocate an buffer of the right size
to decompress the bytecode.
These changes are based on the bytecode compression implemented for WASM in
dom/fetch/FetchUtil.cpp.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D141524
This leaves the code in ScriptLoader and ScriptLoadHandler a lot more readable.
ScriptBytecodeCompressedDataLayout and ScriptBytecodeDataLayout simplify
locating data in the ScriptLoadRequest bytecode buffer when compressing and
decompressing it.
The interface is still error-prone. For example, these classes don't check
that the returned pointers are within the bounds of the buffer.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D145011
The SRI hash at the beginning of ScriptLoadRequest::mScriptBytecode is left
uncompressed because ScriptLoader::OnIncrementalData() tries to decode it
as soon as enough data is read (instead of waiting until OnStreamComplete()).
ScriptLoader writes the length of the uncompressed bytecode to the buffer
to make it easy for ScriptLoadHandler to allocate an buffer of the right size
to decompress the bytecode.
These changes are based on the bytecode compression implemented for WASM in
dom/fetch/FetchUtil.cpp.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D141524
This leaves the code in ScriptLoader and ScriptLoadHandler a lot more readable.
ScriptBytecodeCompressedDataLayout and ScriptBytecodeDataLayout simplify
locating data in the ScriptLoadRequest bytecode buffer when compressing and
decompressing it.
The interface is still error-prone. For example, these classes don't check
that the returned pointers are within the bounds of the buffer.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D145011
The SRI hash at the beginning of ScriptLoadRequest::mScriptBytecode is left
uncompressed because ScriptLoader::OnIncrementalData() tries to decode it
as soon as enough data is read (instead of waiting until OnStreamComplete()).
ScriptLoader writes the length of the uncompressed bytecode to the buffer
to make it easy for ScriptLoadHandler to allocate an buffer of the right size
to decompress the bytecode.
These changes are based on the bytecode compression implemented for WASM in
dom/fetch/FetchUtil.cpp.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D141524
Adds a delazification mode, which spawn a concurrent depth-first delazification
of all function to fill the stencil cache, to later compare cached results with
stencils produced by on-demand delazification.
The delazification mode also works when being used from a main-thread top-level
compilation, in which case the delazification tasks are created and potentially
blocking the main thread, while the delazification is happening.
This way of doing help comparing on-demand delazification, based on instantiated
stencils with concurrent delazification, based on stencils. Which is a good
mode for fuzzing purposes.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D145992
Adds a delazification mode, which spawn a concurrent depth-first delazification
of all function to fill the stencil cache, to later compare cached results with
stencils produced by on-demand delazification.
The delazification mode also works when being used from a main-thread top-level
compilation, in which case the delazification tasks are created and potentially
blocking the main thread, while the delazification is happening.
This way of doing help comparing on-demand delazification, based on instantiated
stencils with concurrent delazification, based on stencils. Which is a good
mode for fuzzing purposes.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D145992
