Instead of creating a display list for the entire page, only create one
for an area that expands around the viewport. On my machine this makes
incremental layout of http://timecube.com 50% faster.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 26045d7fcbab8851fbefe2851cd904203f8fd8dd
This is the first step to allowing incremental iframe creation and destruction. This should eliminate task failures when an iframe is added to the frame tree lazily via script.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: ccdd2910a2df9921b22c9db74f84559d78019199
We have completed the initial step for "Implement Window.sessionStorage and Window.localStorage"
- Create and stub the Storage WebIDL interface
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: c828e8360416e61deaaf6870ebdf9ee2f0abc19b
The current code calls as_slice() on the Option, yielding &[DOMString], and
then calls to_string, yielding "[prefix]".
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 76cc006a40d7242e64c6c12f033127c569914e31
The semantics of has_attribute aren't anywhere close to the ones expected for
Element#hasAttribute, and it fails an assertion when passed non-lower-case
names.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: b27ec2b2231313055232bf9a55343d581e6ead98
This fixes issue #3630
A short summary of the changes:
* Use atomic generation id to cancel inflight requests
* Handles nested calls to abort, open, send inside handlers
* Adds XHRReleaseMsg to delay freeing XHR object till all
inflight events are processed
* Handles both timeout, errors and abort/open in a symmetric fashion
i.e All inflight events will be cancelled for timeouts, aborts,
errors and on calling open.
* Change the ErroredMsg enum to be more symmetric with the returned
Error enum
I noticed a few possible changes that could make the code for fetch task simpler:
* We can remove the additional timer task and let the fetch task manage
its own timer (or maybe the resource loader can do this.)
* The CORS related steps could also be moved into the resource loader.
* Right now upload events are not support. This requires some support
from resource loader.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 4e24e4d8e92528a5a6f7bb571c6557b5bca11ea9
Rust doesn't handle integers as bool on if statements, and defineProperty signature uses *mut instead of *const.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: c4cfb4aae0491ca8016d3cbae9a39a6488b24739
This is a grab bag of various microoptimizations for script that I came across when profiling our performance on RoboHornet.
r? @jdm
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 69f8b46f362a828ffaefe9623355bc1ad76dc5e0
Instead of looking at the display tree, have ContentBox(es)Query consult
the flow tree. This allow optimizing away parts of the display tree
later. To do this we need to be more careful about how we send reflow
requests, only querying the flow tree when possible.
Fixes#3790.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: c9089c45c4b7d40419233b48a192d85a8ad71c99
Fixes#3855.
I'm not sure if this is the right place to set `cancelable`. If changing the default value in `Event::new_inherited` is not satisfactory, it will be possible to set the `Cell`'s value to `false` in `Event::new` itself.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 9b2dae58fd21d1abab825de299161a2b36106076
Remove ```notify_attribute_{changed,removed}``` in favor of a unified ```notify_content_changed```. In the future, whether we decide to specialize ```document.content_changed()```, it'll be just a matter of adding a param.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 4ce185ff11e03c541587177d7e99c9d6bcf0eb82
format!("{}", atom) yields strings like "Atom('span' type=Inline)", which is
not intended here.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 7de9ed5fc7a3061676d9fd02dfc788e196c7123c
This function is not particular to the parser, so should live in the DOM.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 2c6859937354760f2d175c60bad1daa16bd2ed22
Fixes#3356. This makes script elements fetch their source synchronously and execute immediately by default. It also lays some groundwork for future deferred or async script loading.
(Depends on #3716 to fix a content test failure caused by running script during parsing.)
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 272ae0cc1beb83c839d5fbd746e67f4ae746db99
We have created parser trait and declared parse_chunk function in this trait. We are yet to implement this parse_chunk for ServoHTMLParser struct.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 5858fccf873ce30896def4f58aa8c67d1ddd09f1
During debugging, I found it useful to hook all task creation in a
central location, and util::task was the perfect place for it.
r? @pcwalton (or maybe someone else, I'm kinda sending you a bunch of
reviews today because I don't know who better to give them to)
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: ff06be91ebe770290ba912ee71a303810aa62cea
...itor after the initial parse. Fixes#1720. Fixes#3738.
r? @Ms2ger or @Manishearth
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 2df236376a443d8d031ee7a72379f336f2cd8cc4
```JSRef<Attr>``` does not require allocating a ```DOMString``` for value, which are unused in most cases. It also provides more access to ```Attr``` data.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 590a93120a26ab6ea787831d7ba08c47423148bc
#3050
Altough LayoutDataRef is touched from layout, we don't use DOMRefCell in it becasuse
it's expected to manipulate in layout task.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: f5e8df9dac9330f2818906c471ed05f5975828c6
This also tackles some nearby FIXMEs. `traverse_preorder` is used in a LOT of
DOM functions..
r? @pcwalton
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 2bc4ffe5cf331fb7bd246af34c5d12e4e03adda9
This corrects and improves the dom/bindings/DESIGN.md document and also
corrects a grammatical error in a tests/reftest.rs message.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 65856dd00a7da07ece8d3e1e63bc495943266a24
r? @Ms2ger, @jdm
The parser is now a JS-managed object and we use hooks in html5ever to trace its internal state. This should be memory-safe even if arbitrary JavaScript can run during a parse. Please let me know if you think of a reason it wouldn't be!
I think the likely outcome of a garbage collection during parsing is a dynamic `RefCell` borrow failure, but I'm going to look into that after this lands. It should be safe to trace the parser while it's mutably borrowed, as long as it's not shared between threads, so we can probably switch to `UnsafeCell`.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 8d3b107568ab965b518b8003b702a5db993fa7d0
This appears to be a more sensible location for them.
Relevant to #433.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 5be4f40bef05c749bdb5353541abae21a826f6b6
