If there's ::first-letter pseudo element on the multicol container,
ColumnSetWrapperFrame will have the first letter style, but it won't get
the NS_BLOCK_HAS_FIRST_LETTER_STYLE bit during frame construction. The
actual first-letter frame construction happens under -moz-column-content
anonymous block.
This patch excludes ColumnSetWrapperFrame from the debug check to meet
the expectation.
Add a reftest to make sure ::first-letter and ::first-line still work
after introducing ColumnSetWrapperFrame, and no assertion is fired.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D20757
Only nsBlockFrame and its subclasses recognize the nsIFrame::eBlockFrame
flag, so we can replace the usage of the flag with either
nsIFrame::IsBlockFrameOrSubclass() or a do_QueryFrame().
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D20542
This is more consistent with what the Rust bits of the style system do, and
removes a pointer from ComputedStyle which is always nice.
This also aligns the Rust bits with the C++ bits re. not treating xul pseudos as
anonymous boxes. See the comment in nsTreeStyleCache.cpp regarding those.
Can't wait for XUL trees to die.
Depends on D19001
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D19002
Otherwise, if we're scrolled, the scroll frame will think that our scroll range
was reduced, which will in turn clamp the scroll position, which is not good.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D19362
Really sorry for the size of the patch :(
Only intentional behavior change is in the uses of HasLengthAndPercentage(),
where it's easier to do the right thing. The checks that used to check for
(IsCalcUnit() && CalcHasPercentage()) are wrong since bug 957915.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D19553
Also for the intersection observer root margin, since it was easier to fix it
up and clean it up than not doing it.
This is the first big step to get rid of nscoord. It duplicates a bit of logic
in nsLayoutUtils since for now max/min-width/height are still represented with
nsStyleCoord, but I think I prefer to land this incrementally.
I didn't add helpers for the physical accessors of the style rect sides that
nsStyleSides has (top/bottom/left/right) since I think we generally should
encourage the logical versions, but let me know if you want me to do that.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D17739
Without the check that I'm adding in this patch, we'd violate the
"parallel writing mode" expectation of some baseline accessors
that we use in the now-guarded code. And we'd produce bogus layout
as a result.
The added assertions are just for good measure. The included testcase
causes us to fail both assertions, in a build that's missing the fix.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D18715
Doing it during layout instead. This also has the nice side-effect of
no longer needing to do a full restyle when counter-style rules are inserted.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D18343
We can replace it by a simple for-loop. If we want to print not only the
tag, but the detailed frame information, we can use nsFrameList::List().
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D17734
Many of the modifications are guarded by #ifdefs. I verify them locally
by manually define them in nsBlockDebugFlags.h and nsLinelayout.cpp.
Note that I replace "mFrame" with "frame" in lines guarded by
NOISY_BLOCK_DIR_MARGINS in nsBlockFrame.cpp because they were
incorrectly renamed in Bug 1277129 Part 6a.
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/a70b04f074fc
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D17733
The following APIs are changed.
1. Contains() needs to become contains(). (EnumSet's methods have lowercase names.)
2. Use list constructor rather than "|" like a plain enum.
3. Use operator+= instead of operator|=.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D14908
All of the removed includes are redundant (i.e. they're #included elsewhere in
the same file).
In most cases, I'm removing the second (redundant) copy of the
#include, except when that copy makes more sense (i.e. if it's in better sorted
order, or if it's paired alongside a closely-associated header while the
earlier copy is not).
Here's the script that I used to generate candidates here -- I ran this in
every subdirectory of layout, on my linux machine (warning, this writes two
files to your /tmp directory):
for FILE in *.h *.cpp; do
nonunique=$(grep \#include $FILE | grep -v List\.h | cut -f2 -d'"' | cut -f2- -d'/'| cut -f2- -d'/' | sort | wc -l)
unique=$( grep \#include $FILE | grep -v List\.h | cut -f2 -d'"' | cut -f2- -d'/'| cut -f2- -d'/' | sort | uniq | wc -l)
if [[ "$unique" != "$nonunique" ]]; then
echo "$FILE: $nonunique / $unique"
grep \#include $FILE | cut -f2 -d'"' | grep -v List\.h | cut -f2- -d'/'| cut -f2- -d'/' | sort > /tmp/nonunique.txt
grep \#include $FILE | cut -f2 -d'"' | grep -v List\.h | cut -f2- -d'/'| cut -f2- -d'/' | sort | uniq > /tmp/unique.txt
diff /tmp/nonunique.txt /tmp/unique.txt
echo
fi
done
Depends on D13773
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D13774
Currently, GetSplittableType() is called only in
nsCSSFrameConstructor::CreateContinuingFrame(). The splittable concrete frames
should inherit from nsSplittableFrame, and must explicitly create continuing
frame in CreateContinuingFrame(). Thus, no need to maintain GetSplittableType().
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D10798
The CSSWG has recently resolved that layout containment
suppress baseline alignment, while size containment does not:
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2995
Spec text (https://drafts.csswg.org/css-contain/#containment-layout):
"7. For the purpose of the vertical-align property,
or any other property whose effects need to relate
the position of the containing element's baseline
to something other than its descendants,
the containing element is treated as having no baseline."
And a note in (https://drafts.csswg.org/css-contain/#containment-size):
"Note: size containment does not suppress baseline alignment.
See layout containment for that."
This patch does this change just switching IsContainSize()
by IsLayoutSize() in several places related to baseline alignment
in the source code.
With the patch several WPT tests start to pass. Apart from that,
some of the tests under vendor-imports are updated to follow
the new behavior.
nsCSSFrameConstructor::FindDisplayData() guarantees a block with "display:
list-item" will be constructed by ConstructBlock() (either through
ConstructScrollableBlock() or ConstructNonScrollableBlock()).
This is also a preparation to fix bug 1491915 since we want to control
bullet frame creation under column hierarchy.
Depends on D6840
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D6841
Those arguments were added in bug 591737 to create a triangle for the
summary frame, but <summary> has been re-implemented by using "list-item"
since then. Now the only caller is nsBlockFrame itself, so there's no need
to expose those arguments.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D6839
Summary:
Once the nsDisplayList difficulties are sorted out, this
becomes rather trivial.
Depends on D5293
Reviewers: mattwoodrow
Reviewed By: mattwoodrow
Bug #: 1489588
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D5294
We'll re-do the line anyway, and we'll forget about all the already-positioned
floats in the line DoReflowInlineFrames anyway.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D4457
Bug 1478178 regressed this case because bullet frame is the last frame
added to line layout, rather than the first, so when we try to apply
justification, we end up giving it the accumulated offset of the whole
line.
Bullet frame has to be added after other frames in the line have been
placed, because its presence may depend on whether the line is empty.
However, bullet frame is logically the first frame in a line and
appending it to the end is somewhat counter-intuitive.
Thus, this patch tries to fix the issue via prepending bullet frame in
line layout, so that the order of frames there can be more reliable.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D3760
Scrollable elements already trap all of their contents, nothing should spill
out, so there is no need for special handling of the `contain` CSS property.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D3854
