http://dbaron.org/css/intrinsic/
Column spans are not yet supported.
This effectively adds support for percentage widths, and it also fixes
many bugs, improving the layout of Google and Wikipedia.
r? @SimonSapin
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: e2d7777c41135b71293c195d2a9d7a1bc2afd0ca
This implements a general framework for legacy presentational attributes
to the DOM and style calculation, so that adding more of them later will
be straightforward.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 0aeecfc41d5f0c637960fcddf87cc2db3e5efeea
75% improvement in style recalc for Guardians of the Galaxy.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 8077edc0622b04aeb26d42ced86ea285c9cac0e7
Instead of taking margin size into account twice when positioning
layers, just rely on the absolute position calculated during display
list construction.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 834df4e211e7dcac4369da4f5b8113f295869aa1
This should fix the most frequent intermittent wpt failure.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 083bf27b7536a8ae825ce87df4344f9e3cbc1a10
We push down clipping areas during absolute position calculation. This
makes display items into a flat list, improving cache locality. It
dramatically simplifies the code all around.
Because we need to push down clip rects even for absolutely-positioned
children of non-absolutely-positioned flows, this patch alters the
parallel traversal to compute absolute positions for
absolutely-positioned children at the same time it computes absolute
positions for other children. This doesn't seem to break anything either
in theory (since the overall order remains correct) or in practice. It
simplifies the parallel traversal code quite a bit.
See the relevant Gecko bug:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=615734
r? @mrobinson
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: fd70b366aeada7f8cb4b2457c04fd07f0ea9b143
This PR removes public fields from all (hope I didn't miss any) DOM structs. Should |Page| be privatized as well? This PR additionally introduces a #[privatize] lint to ensure nobody accidentally re-introduces a public field.
All changesets compile separately if applied in the same order. Hope that helps reviewing but I can of course squash them before merging.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: f350879574194bb612eac88e21d0920e9827afa7
I don't think it will be possible to avoid splitting fragments in the
presence of `vertical-align`, because one `ScannedTextFragment` could
potentially be split into arbitrary many fragments, each having its own
vertical position that can influence layout of other fragments.
This code also removes parts of `Range` that were no longer used.
r? @glennw
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 799d0de0c09420a9657a6a7b5fb814374da31163
This makes layout more idempotent, which is important for incremental
layout.
Also converts `is_root` to a set of flags and fixes a `TODO` concerning
percentage inline heights of images.
r? @glennw
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 7902ccf8507a7ec31515bfb5824dc4727564fe4d
Extra size from margins should be included in block size, so that
layers are large enough to include the entire block. This is typically
hidden by large tile sizes (512x512), but fitted tiles makes the issue
a lot more common.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 7f26c671377dad073da38058c75b2d3b380b6f16
stretching.
This preserves the usage of the Bloom filter throughout style recalc,
but the implementation is rewritten. Provides a 15% improvement on
Guardians of the Galaxy.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: e048f3f940e124d45b43a53a850177c45907822d
This patch puts in the initial framework for incremental reflow. Nodes' styles
are no longer recalculated unless the node has changed.
I've been hacking on the general problem of incremental reflow for the past
couple weeks, and I've yet to get a full implementation that actually passes all
the reftests + wikipedia + cnn. Therefore, I'm going to try to land the different
parts of it one by one.
This patch only does incremental style recalc, without incremental flow
construction, inline-size bubbling, reflow, or display lists. Those will be coming
in that order as I finish them.
At least with this strategy, I can land a working version of incremental reflow,
even if not yet complete.
r? @pcwalton
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 85b277655f07db1cb99c4d3dee93804735ed0470
Makes multiple `<br>` elements work, since those are implemented via
`before` pseudos.
r? @mbrubeck
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 15b508ac10d0e98ba10474b6ab091017ae95804e
Layers are currently all children of the root layer, so instead of
using coordinates relative to the parent flow we should use coordinates
relative to the page.
Fixes#2061.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: eff0de0ce12b20ffc4806d14c95777004003f2ae
This implements basic support for attribute selectors with namespace prefixes. I would have added a more sophisticated test covering various selectors but it seems that we don't have an XML parser yet and thus no XHTML support?
r? @SimonSapin
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: f49c730720a51d14dacefe9815faf50216b36b91
The Mach test runner doesn't actually make these failures yet, which is
tracked by #3482.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: ae946a9b762d66f01f669ff526eff5c0eaaa3404
Now that we use `JSTraceable` (defined in `script`), we can create arbitrary implementations on non-`script` types (eg `Url` or `RequestHeaderCollection`) where in the past we had to rely on `Traceable` and `Untraceable` to achieve cross-crate impls of `Encodable`.
This removes the two completely. They can be reintroduced if required, though the `untraceable!` macro should suffice.
Fixes#3469
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: b34df7c343579f200d2e67e21fc566842a4e4a91
Although the computed `display` property of elements with `position:
absolute` is `block`, `position: absolute; display: inline` can still
behave differently from `position: absolute; display: block`. This is
because the hypothetical box for `position: absolute` can be at the
position it would have been if it had `display: inline`. CSS 2.1 §
10.3.7 describes this case in a parenthetical:
"The static-position containing block is the containing block of a
hypothetical box that would have been the first box of the element if
its specified 'position' value had been 'static' and its specified
'float' had been 'none'. (Note that due to the rules in section 9.7 this
hypothetical calculation might require also assuming a different
computed value for 'display'.)"
To handle this, I had to change both style computation and layout. For
the former, I added an internal property
`-servo-display-for-hypothetical-box`, which stores the `display` value
supplied by the author, before the computed value is calculated. Flow
construction now uses this value.
As for layout, implementing the proper behavior is tricky because the
position of an inline fragment in the inline direction cannot be
determined until height assignment, which is a parallelism hazard
because in parallel layout widths are computed before heights. However,
in this particular case we can avoid the parallelism hazard because the
inline direction of a hypothetical box only affects the layout if an
absolutely-positioned element is unconstrained in the inline direction.
Therefore, we can just lay out such absolutely-positioned elements with
a bogus inline position and fix it up once the true inline position of
the hypothetical box is computed. The name for this fix-up process is
"late computation of inline position" (and the corresponding fix-up for
the block position is called "late computation of block position").
This improves the header on /r/rust.
r? @glennw
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: f7d2fb6ff86afff7a5b674f751af9370a5a6b142
So far the changes to layout seem fairly well-contained; I think this is worth integrating to give us a browser that is easier to dogfood (and allows us to work on things like form submission much easier), especially since the long-term viability of WebComponents-as-forms is not assured.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: f80096069592b864221abe112eaf2ecb6c444fda
The biggest language change is that enum variants now also reserve (for future use) a name in the type namespace, which must not collide with other types. Some things were renamed, and others qualified as `module::name`.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 7409685589c550ee7a9f94182f511acddab4c6fd
