Now that we send everything (except sometimes the user value
is sanitized) we should no longer perform this check.
This is also good because it eliminates security code you
have to have (and thus accidently omitting it is a
vulnerability) and changes it to security code that happens
automatically, and is enforced by the compiler (via mandatory
ctor argument.)
Depends on D141414
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D141415
PreferenceUpdate is the IPC message notifying a child process
that a preference has been updated. To correctly decide whether
or not a value should be sanitized in it, we need to know
what type of destination process it is; we add parameters to
Preferences::GetPreference indicating that.
Inside of ToDomPref we call ShouldSanitizePreference to
correctly populate the sanitized bit.
Depends on D141412
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D141413
This simplifies the number of negations needed,
and makes things easy to understand. I think
anyway; I know that without renaming it I made
several annoying-to-diagnose negation errors...
Depends on D141411
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D141412
A couple places where it might be a web content process
still pass 'false' - this will be corrected in a later
patch.
Depends on D141410
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D141411
Now that we send everything (except sometimes the user value
is sanitized) we should no longer perform this check.
This is also good because it eliminates security code you
have to have (and thus accidently omitting it is a
vulnerability) and changes it to security code that happens
automatically, and is enforced by the compiler (via mandatory
ctor argument.)
Depends on D141414
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D141415
PreferenceUpdate is the IPC message notifying a child process
that a preference has been updated. To correctly decide whether
or not a value should be sanitized in it, we need to know
what type of destination process it is; we add parameters to
Preferences::GetPreference indicating that.
Inside of ToDomPref we call ShouldSanitizePreference to
correctly populate the sanitized bit.
Depends on D141412
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D141413
This simplifies the number of negations needed,
and makes things easy to understand. I think
anyway; I know that without renaming it I made
several annoying-to-diagnose negation errors...
Depends on D141411
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D141412
A couple places where it might be a web content process
still pass 'false' - this will be corrected in a later
patch.
Depends on D141410
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D141411
Now that we send everything (except sometimes the user value
is sanitized) we should no longer perform this check.
This is also good because it eliminates security code you
have to have (and thus accidently omitting it is a
vulnerability) and changes it to security code that happens
automatically, and is enforced by the compiler (via mandatory
ctor argument.)
Depends on D141414
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D141415
PreferenceUpdate is the IPC message notifying a child process
that a preference has been updated. To correctly decide whether
or not a value should be sanitized in it, we need to know
what type of destination process it is; we add parameters to
Preferences::GetPreference indicating that.
Inside of ToDomPref we call ShouldSanitizePreference to
correctly populate the sanitized bit.
Depends on D141412
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D141413
This simplifies the number of negations needed,
and makes things easy to understand. I think
anyway; I know that without renaming it I made
several annoying-to-diagnose negation errors...
Depends on D141411
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D141412
A couple places where it might be a web content process
still pass 'false' - this will be corrected in a later
patch.
Depends on D141410
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D141411
Now that we send everything (except sometimes the user value
is sanitized) we should no longer perform this check.
This is also good because it eliminates security code you
have to have (and thus accidently omitting it is a
vulnerability) and changes it to security code that happens
automatically, and is enforced by the compiler (via mandatory
ctor argument.)
Depends on D141414
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D141415
PreferenceUpdate is the IPC message notifying a child process
that a preference has been updated. To correctly decide whether
or not a value should be sanitized in it, we need to know
what type of destination process it is; we add parameters to
Preferences::GetPreference indicating that.
Inside of ToDomPref we call ShouldSanitizePreference to
correctly populate the sanitized bit.
Depends on D141412
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D141413
This simplifies the number of negations needed,
and makes things easy to understand. I think
anyway; I know that without renaming it I made
several annoying-to-diagnose negation errors...
Depends on D141411
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D141412
A couple places where it might be a web content process
still pass 'false' - this will be corrected in a later
patch.
Depends on D141410
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D141411
Now that we send everything (except sometimes the user value
is sanitized) we should no longer perform this check.
This is also good because it eliminates security code you
have to have (and thus accidently omitting it is a
vulnerability) and changes it to security code that happens
automatically, and is enforced by the compiler (via mandatory
ctor argument.)
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D138684
