`this.forNode` (with `this` being a `PanelMultiView` instance) may
return a node that was already disconnected before, in which case its
`node` member will be void. To avoid unexpected promise rejections, add
a null check before `_moveOutKids()`.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D167369
Move it to the mozilla::widget namespace.
Use enum classes for transparency, popup type, popup level, etc.
Mostly automated with sed, but there were a few manual changes required
as well in windows code because they relied on Atomic<TransparencyMode>
working (which now doesn't because TransparencyMode is 1 byte instead of
4 bytes).
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D167537
- Explicitly wait for popup close (via port.onDisconnect) before
checking whether the popup is closed.
- On --headless (MOZ_HEADLESS), explicitly close the popup since that
does not automatically happen for some unknown reason. Test case:
./mach test browser/components/extensions/test/browser/browser_ext_incognito_views.js --headless
- Explicitly wait for popup close (via port.onDisconnect) before
closing the final private window. While this is mainly meant as
a work-around for bug 1800100, it also helps with reducing the
impact of bug 1811071 (follow up in bug 1811459).
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D167190
Bug 1323311 tried to improve browser.tabs.move, but the logic didn't
really make sense (e.g. why use 2 different maps to track indices?),
and it broke moving multiple tabs between windows: they would appear
in the wrong order.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D166405
This patch removes the use of the "unified extensions" pref and adjust
the existing tests. More clean-ups will be done in follow-ups, e.g. the
removal of `gUnifiedExtensions.isEnabled` and some test-only changes to
no longer create a new window in each test file.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D166908
In order to handle the content script case correctly we must expose the
contentScriptAddonPolicy to JavaScript. With that we can always see what
extension is trying to perform an action and use its name rather than internal
ID in the dialog.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D161282
And make callers rely on that instead of allowInheritPrincipal when
creating lazy tabs.
Unlike allowInheritPrincipal, skipLoad sets the nodefaultsrc attribute.
This avoids a load instead of falling back to about:blank.
One consequence of that is that switching to a lazy about:blank tab will
not notify invoke listeners registered with addTabsProgressListener
(listeners registered with addProgressListener will still be invoked).
Thus test browser_open_in_lazy_tab.js needs to be updated.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D166012
My guess is that it was done using shadows to not interfere with the
native look, but actually this just works even with native-looking menus
(like the <select> menulist), because the background-color for those is
set on the menupopup, rather than the ::part(content).
So those have effectively 1px of extra padding (due to the transparent
border), but that seems barely perceptible, and worth the consistency
and simplification.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D164716
Bug 1805414 will move menu event handling to the DOM.
With that change the current synthetic click behavior of XUL menuitems
breaks. On current central, we rely on nsMenuFrame::HandleEvent not
getting called at all for synthetic clicks, and instead we just fire a
command event synchronously here:
https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/rev/a0d4f8f112c5c792ae272bf6ce50763ddd23ffa2/dom/xul/nsXULElement.cpp#1071
After my patch the command event is fired properly (potentially
asynchronously too) by the regular menu activation machinery, which is
preferable.
* They fire a command event synchronously (even though on some
platforms like macOS activating a context menu item is async).
* They use a totally different codepath from what a user does.
* They don't deal with native menus, etc.
We have a proper API for this (activateItem) which takes a much more
closer codepath to what users do, requires that the menu is shown, etc.
Use that API instead for testing.
As a benefit, tests now do not need to close the context menu manually
when clicking on a menu item (because we trigger the same code path as
users clicking the menu).
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D164567
Bug 1805414 will move menu event handling to the DOM.
With that change the current synthetic click behavior of XUL menuitems
breaks. On current central, we rely on nsMenuFrame::HandleEvent not
getting called at all for synthetic clicks, and instead we just fire a
command event synchronously here:
https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/rev/a0d4f8f112c5c792ae272bf6ce50763ddd23ffa2/dom/xul/nsXULElement.cpp#1071
After my patch the command event is fired properly (potentially
asynchronously too) by the regular menu activation machinery, which is
preferable.
* They fire a command event synchronously (even though on some
platforms like macOS activating a context menu item is async).
* They use a totally different codepath from what a user does.
* They don't deal with native menus, etc.
We have a proper API for this (activateItem) which takes a much more
closer codepath to what users do, requires that the menu is shown, etc.
Use that API instead for testing.
As a benefit, tests now do not need to close the context menu manually
when clicking on a menu item (because we trigger the same code path as
users clicking the menu).
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D164567
Currently we are sending some values, such as principals, from the content
process when creating a nsContextMenu. This information is already available in
the parent process on WindowGlobalParent, so changes the code to fetch the
values from there instead.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D161835
In order to handle the content script case correctly we must expose the
contentScriptAddonPolicy to JavaScript. With that we can always see what
extension is trying to perform an action and use its name rather than internal
ID in the dialog.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D161282
Currently we are sending some values, such as principals, from the content
process when creating a nsContextMenu. This information is already available in
the parent process on WindowGlobalParent, so changes the code to fetch the
values from there instead.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D161835
