This patch adds the initial `release-uptake-monitoring` kind, and adds
it to the `publish_fennec` `target_tasks_method`.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 3RDMNGrbBwD
This patch adds the initial `release-bouncer-aliases` kind, and adds it
to the `publish_fennec` `target_tasks_method`.
It also adds the ability to specify the `tuxedo_server_url`
`by-project`.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 9I4IaUlbCCD
This patch adds the initial `release-mark-as-shipped` kind, and adds it to
the `publish_fennec` `target_tasks_method`.
MozReview-Commit-ID: F8AYscJQWlh
This hooks up the `target_tasks_method`s and the
`release_promotion_flavor`s for these four release promotion flavors.
We also add some maple support and add `version_display.txt` to the
decision task sparse checkout so we can read the version number during
decision/action task time.
MozReview-Commit-ID: CdxUUXZtXO0
This patch creates a new `filter_beta_release_tasks` function. By
pulling this logic out of `mozilla_beta_tasks`, we can reuse it in the
release promotion `target_tasks_method`s.
MozReview-Commit-ID: Kwk3jgtooCS
With this in place, all `-j`obs will not run by default on try. This will omit
such jobs in most try pushes even if files-changed matches. This is
unfortunate, but better than running them unconditionally. Fuzzy selections,
and later `just try it` pushes, are the ultimate solution here.
With this change, a push with no try syntax or try_task_config.json will schedule
no tasks at all.
MozReview-Commit-ID: FGjqlDW1FT6
for: Run buildbot's periodic_file_update job scheduled via taskcluster.
I messed up thinking this was filter-out not filter in the target task method.
I'm also renaming the target_task method in order to avoid these decision jobs
from needing to contact balrog for partial data (because it had 'nightly' in the
target task name.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 3uetnWG4vnW
This sets the try_mode property, and parses the try message (if given), early
in the decision task and puts the results into the parameters.
The proximate need is to set optimze_target_tasks for some try modes and not
others. This also replaces the existing logic for parsing messages for certain
kinds, and makes the distinction between the different try modes a little
clearer.
MozReview-Commit-ID: AXJEGLh6pEV
This sets the try_mode property, and parses the try message (if given), early
in the decision task and puts the results into the parameters.
The proximate need is to set optimze_target_tasks for some try modes and not
others. This also replaces the existing logic for parsing messages for certain
kinds, and makes the distinction between the different try modes a little
clearer.
MozReview-Commit-ID: AXJEGLh6pEV
This sets the try_mode property, and parses the try message (if given), early
in the decision task and puts the results into the parameters.
The proximate need is to set optimze_target_tasks for some try modes and not
others. This also replaces the existing logic for parsing messages for certain
kinds, and makes the distinction between the different try modes a little
clearer.
MozReview-Commit-ID: AXJEGLh6pEV
This provides a mechanism to modify the behaviour of tasks from a try push. The try_task_config.json
looks something like:
{
"tasks": ["build-linux64/opt", "test-linux64/opt-mochitest-e10s-1"],
"templates": {
"artifact": {"enabled": 1}
}
}
This tells taskgraph to apply the 'artifact' template to all tasks. Templates are JSONe based
.yml files that live under taskcluster/taskgraph/templates. Taskgraph will render every template
against every task definition. The templates themselves can then use JSONe condition statements to
filter out which tasks they should or shouldn't apply to.
MozReview-Commit-ID: J8HVZzOt4mX
This introduces a 'try_task_config' method of scheduling. En lieu of (or in addition to) try
syntax, you can now check in a file called 'try_task_config.json' to the root of the source
tree. The format is either a list of task labels, or dict where task labels are the keys.
Taskcluster will simply schedule any tasks that are listed there.
This file is primarily meant to be generated by tools (which don't exist yet), as the json
format is much easier for tools to generate or consume. These tools should use an in-memory
commit to add the file so it is automatically removed again after the push.
A server-side hook will be added in bug 1380357 to prevent this file from accidentally
landing on non-try trees.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 2zKfZXuuDhH
This adds the mozconfigs, mozharness configs and taskcluster changes required
to create optimized DMD builds for linux64, win32, win64 and macosx64.
These builds will happen nightly on mozilla-central
We also add support for custom build variants on Windows (or other generic
worker environments).
MozReview-Commit-ID: HrVT9PLSWVx
This patch removes the nightly code coverage run in favor of simply running the two code coverage builds on every single push to mozilla-central for a more granular view of code coverage over time.
MozReview-Commit-ID: E4Xp5bB19m9
It's a bit hacky to single out 'build' dependencies, but most tasks have a dependency on a docker
image, so we can't blanket skip all 'job' tasks with any dependencies at all. This is far from ideal
but is an improvement on the current behaviour of running build dependencies all the time, even if
the 'job' task gets optimized away.
There is likely a cleverer solution, but that can be follow-up work.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 6T68LT5VSrg
Add configurations for building and uploading AArch64 Nightly builds, in
tier 1 and without artifact support for now.
As for not denoting AArch64 builds as "api-21", I don't really think we
will split AArch64 the way we split ARMv7 before. Originally, we split
into API 9 and API 11+ because of lots of "constrained" devices that
were stuck with API 9. We made an API 9 APK in order to lower our
footprint on those devices. That probably will not be a problem for
AArch64, because devices with API 21+ and AArch64 support are usually
more than capable for running Fennec. Secondly, it was a big change for
Android going from API 9 to API 11+, so we saved quite a bit of
code/resources when we stripped out API 11+. I don't see such drastic
changes going from API 21 to upcoming versions, so even if we did split,
I don't think it'll get us much benefit.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 7N7Slv1pPgb
