Now we sort CSS animation/transition events by scheduled event time prior
to compositor order.
SortEvents() will be a private method in the next patch in this patch
series.
MozReview-Commit-ID: ICkOayquN0f
In a subsequent patch in this patch series, we want to make nsPresContext
have an AnimationEventDispatcher as RefPtr<>.
Instead, if we were trying to make nsPresContext have the
AnimationEventDispatcher as data object (not RefPtr<>) just like we did in
CommonAnimationManager, we will fall into header inclusion hell since Element.h
includes nsPresContext.h and AnimationEventDispatcher.h ends up including
Element.h. Even if we could solve the inclusion hell, we will suffer from Rust
bindgen issues for some reasons.
MozReview-Commit-ID: B0nX2JzIRJD
Now single AnimationEventDispatcher can handle both CSS animation/transition
events simultaneously. To do this we had to change AnimationEventInfo and
TransitionEventInfo into a single struct, the struct is also named
AnimationEventInfo.
It results we can sort both CSS animation/transition events altogether. Thus
we make sure CSS animation/transition events are sorted by scheduled event time
prior to their composite order (i.e. transitions is prior to animations).
At this moment, we don't sort both events altogether since nsAnimationManager
and nsTransitionManager has an AnimationEventDispatcher respectively. In the
next patch we move AnimationEventDispatcher into nsPresContext, i.e. each
document has an AnimationEventDispatcher without the distinction between
CSS animations and transitions.
Note that, after this patch, we copy all members in InternalTransitionEvent and
InternalAnimationEvent in the copy-constructor of AnimationEventInfo, this
will be fixed once WidgetEvent has move-constructor and move-assignment
(bug 1433008).
MozReview-Commit-ID: 5JAh6N7C6ee
Now we sort CSS animation/transition events by scheduled event time prior
to compositor order.
SortEvents() will be a private method in the next patch in this patch
series.
MozReview-Commit-ID: ICkOayquN0f
In a subsequent patch in this patch series, we want to make nsPresContext
have an AnimationEventDispatcher as RefPtr<>.
Instead, if we were trying to make nsPresContext have the
AnimationEventDispatcher as data object (not RefPtr<>) just like we did in
CommonAnimationManager, we will fall into header inclusion hell since Element.h
includes nsPresContext.h and AnimationEventDispatcher.h ends up including
Element.h. Even if we could solve the inclusion hell, we will suffer from Rust
bindgen issues for some reasons.
MozReview-Commit-ID: B0nX2JzIRJD
Now single AnimationEventDispatcher can handle both CSS animation/transition
events simultaneously. To do this we had to change AnimationEventInfo and
TransitionEventInfo into a single struct, the struct is also named
AnimationEventInfo.
It results we can sort both CSS animation/transition events altogether. Thus
we make sure CSS animation/transition events are sorted by scheduled event time
prior to their composite order (i.e. transitions is prior to animations).
At this moment, we don't sort both events altogether since nsAnimationManager
and nsTransitionManager has an AnimationEventDispatcher respectively. In the
next patch we move AnimationEventDispatcher into nsPresContext, i.e. each
document has an AnimationEventDispatcher without the distinction between
CSS animations and transitions.
Note that, after this patch, we copy all members in InternalTransitionEvent and
InternalAnimationEvent in the copy-constructor of AnimationEventInfo, this
will be fixed once WidgetEvent has move-constructor and move-assignment
(bug 1433008).
MozReview-Commit-ID: 5JAh6N7C6ee
DispatchEvents() couldn't be moved since the function holds a reference of
nsAnimationManager or nsTransitionManager, but the common template class
is not ref-countable.
MozReview-Commit-ID: FfiJtzSZWn
This reflects the change made to the Web Animations specification in:
9e2053f5531c3415f4cc
(I got it wrong the first time. The second commit fixes the first.)
And discussed in:
https://github.com/w3c/web-animations/issues/196
In summary, we are splitting the "pending" play state out into a separate
boolean member so that it is possible to distinguish between "play-pending" and
"pause-pending" and because most of the time when you check for
animation.playState === 'running' you also really want to include play-pending
animations.
MozReview-Commit-ID: IJSNoZTKW2I
This patch was generated automatically by the "modeline.py" script, available
here: https://github.com/amccreight/moz-source-tools/blob/master/modeline.py
For every file that is modified in this patch, the changes are as follows:
(1) The patch changes the file to use the exact C++ mode lines from the
Mozilla coding style guide, available here:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Developer_guide/Coding_Style#Mode_Line
(2) The patch deletes any blank lines between the mode line & the MPL
boilerplate comment.
(3) If the file previously had the mode lines and MPL boilerplate in a
single contiguous C++ comment, then the patch splits them into
separate C++ comments, to match the boilerplate in the coding style.
MozReview-Commit-ID: EuRsDue63tK
(Path is actually r=froydnj.)
Bug 1400459 devirtualized nsIAtom so that it is no longer a subclass of
nsISupports. This means that nsAtom is now a better name for it than nsIAtom.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 91U22X2NydP
We will use this type later in this patch series in nsSMILCSSProperty so this
patch moves it to a separate file so it can be re-used.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 4Z7YbsQ9xz4
We also need to update the interpolation code based on ServoAnimationValue in
ElementPropertyTransition::UpdateStartValueFromReplacedTransition().
Therefore, ElementPropertyTransition can be used by both Gecko and Servo.
MozReview-Commit-ID: BrIpvRR3te8
GetTransitionKeyframes is a simple helper function, which is only used by
ConsiderInitiatingTransition, so let's make it static to reduce the time
to revise the header.
MozReview-Commit-ID: HlztPxz8sMJ
We will need to remove animation from timeline before calling Animation::UpdateTiming() in order to fire the cancel event.
In bug 1264125, we request one more tick after calling Animation::Cancel(), however we won't need to call this request if we apply this changeset.
MozReview-Commit-ID: h0dxUdtgkl
In Web Animations specification, if the animation effect is in none of the any phase, it define as 'Idle' phase. [1]
But, in the gecko, it defined as 'Null' phase.
So we will need to use 'Idle' phase for consistency.
[1] https://w3c.github.io/web-animations/#idle-phase
MozReview-Commit-ID: FlPpYOqdM4X
