This was done automatically replacing:
s/mozilla::Move/std::move/
s/ Move(/ std::move(/
s/(Move(/(std::move(/
Removing the 'using mozilla::Move;' lines.
And then with a few manual fixups, see the bug for the split series..
MozReview-Commit-ID: Jxze3adipUh
nsContentUtils::NS_NewXULOrHTMLElement will call into
CustomElementRegisty::RegisterCallbackUpgradeElement, which keeps
the newly created element, allowing RunCustomElementCreationCallback
to upgrade them after the callback runs.
It is unclear if this changes the order of constructor executions,
but even so it should not affact our use case.
MozReview-Commit-ID: LWTn7B35aBv
This would help in the case where it is safe to run script in-place and
the CustomElementDefinition is available before the function exits.
This fixes the tests changed.
MozReview-Commit-ID: Ays91W94WZm
Nodes copied from DOMParser document fragment would need to be
created with the proper custom element data.
CustomElementRegistry::IsCustomElementEnabled() is changed to allow
it to run in the test document.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 4GACDR8FIc7
1) The passed-in constructor is already same-compartment with the passed-in
aCx, so there is no need to enter its Realm to work with it.
2) aCx is already in the compartment of constructorProtoUnwrapped when we do
JS_WrapValue on rootedv, which is initialized to constructorProtoUnwrapped.
That JS_WrapValue call is not needed.
This check is already done by the dictionary init method. This function just
makes us do extra non-spec get operations.
For now this introduces more failures due to bug 1419323 and the spec issue at
<https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/3580>. The tests testing for that stuff
were passing due to exceptions getting thrown from CheckLifeCycleCallbacks.
This patch enables us to specify a custom element type with |is| attribute
or property when creating a XUL element. Because non-dashed names are valid
custom element names in XUL (bug 1446247), other checks has to modified
accordingly.
The checks I am settling with are
1) Forbids the custom built-in element names to be a non-dashed name.
2) Forbids the custom built-in element to extend a dashed built-in element name.
This also ensures the custom built-in element types don't take on the same
name as the element name it extends.
MozReview-Commit-ID: GCQ9RnfvvrC
This patch creates a chrome-only method
customElements.setElementCreationCallback() so that custom elements migrated
from XBL bindings doesn't have to be define()'d on document loading. With this
method, we will set callbacks and the platform will get back to us when it
encounters a matched custom element type -- and the callback will load the
relevant script.
It's important to note that the callback runs after construction of the first
element; it will be upgraded when it's being appended.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 80z72zwXRlf
This will make it possible to migrate existing bindings without also needing to
mass-rewrite frontend code at the same time.
MozReview-Commit-ID: IBBqC4eeDDX
The webconsole UI generates a large number of scrollbars, and considering their children as
potential Custom Elements causes a slowdown when setting innerHTML="" when devtools closes.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 2QCcXCnTHA2
This will make it possible to migrate existing bindings without also needing to
mass-rewrite frontend code at the same time.
MozReview-Commit-ID: IBBqC4eeDDX
This allows custom elements to work in any document in the parent process that
allows XUL and XBL. The test takes the easy option of moving the existing XUL
custom element test to a run with the custom element pref disabled.
MozReview-Commit-ID: CMiLzmp60jA
This allows custom elements to work in any document in the parent process that
allows XUL and XBL. The test takes the easy option of moving the existing XUL
custom element test to a run with the custom element pref disabled.
MozReview-Commit-ID: CMiLzmp60jA
Since we are dealing with the element (nodeInfo->LocalName() and NameAtom() are the same value),
we could use nodeInfo->NameAtom() instead.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 4vIBDEM1Nwv
The CustomElementUpgradeReaction and CustomElementCallbackReaction are only used inside CustomElementRegistry.cpp,
so we don't need to expose them in header file.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 9lYwHeFIODi
