After this patch, we still need nsFrameList::Enumerator to iterate
nsFrameList::Slice. We might enhance nsFrameList::Iterator to support Slice, but
I'll leave this for another day.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D158809
It's unused on mozilla-central, and Thunderbird can just use the canvas
frame as regular (X)HTML documents, so just use a canvas frame instead
of an nsRootBoxFrame for XUL as well.
nsRootBoxFrame was needed because of various XUL-specific things like
tooltips and so on lived there. But with the move away from XUL, that
functionality has been added to nsCanvasFrame already, behind a
principal check instead.
This also allows simplifying our background propagation setup, which was
only half-working for XUL documents (this bug is a consequence of that).
With this, most of the callers of nsCSSRendering::IsCanvasFrame can go.
They're only two of the frames that would return true for that that
actually paint backgrounds (nsCanvasFrame and nsRootBoxFrame), so the
codepaths in display list building and painting can just check
frame->IsCanvasFrame() instead.
The remaining caller to that function is
nsContainerFrame::SyncWindowProperties, and the change is also legit, in
the sense that the only thing SyncWindowProperties() really cares about
is propagating the max/min-width constraints from the root element's
style to the view/widget, and the only frame that would return true from
IsCanvasFrame and have a view is the viewport frame which is the root of
the frame tree.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D90846
It's unused on mozilla-central, and Thunderbird can just use the canvas
frame as regular (X)HTML documents, so just use a canvas frame instead
of an nsRootBoxFrame for XUL as well.
nsRootBoxFrame was needed because of various XUL-specific things like
tooltips and so on lived there. But with the move away from XUL, that
functionality has been added to nsCanvasFrame already, behind a
principal check instead.
This also allows simplifying our background propagation setup, which was
only half-working for XUL documents (this bug is a consequence of that).
With this, most of the callers of nsCSSRendering::IsCanvasFrame can go.
They're only two of the frames that would return true for that that
actually paint backgrounds (nsCanvasFrame and nsRootBoxFrame), so the
codepaths in display list building and painting can just check
frame->IsCanvasFrame() instead.
The remaining caller to that function is
nsContainerFrame::SyncWindowProperties, and the change is also legit, in
the sense that the only thing SyncWindowProperties() really cares about
is propagating the max/min-width constraints from the root element's
style to the view/widget, and the only frame that would return true from
IsCanvasFrame and have a view is the viewport frame which is the root of
the frame tree.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D90846
Gijs for front-end bits, layout for the new CSS properties and the
removal of nsDeckFrame / nsStackLayout, Jamie and Morgan for the a11y
changes.
As discussed in the bug, the main tricky part here is handling a11y
correctly. For <deck>, that's trivial (just use `visibility: hidden` to
hide the panels visually, while removing the unselected panels from the
a11y tree).
For <tabpanels> however we need to do something special. We do want to
hide stuff visually, but we want to preserve the contents in the a11y
tree.
For that, the easiest fix is introducing a new privileged CSS property
(-moz-subtree-hidden-only-visually), which takes care of not painting
the frame, but marks stuff offscreen in the accessibility tree. This is
not intended to be a property used widely.
Other than that, the changes are relatively straight-forward, though
some of the accessible/mac changes I could get a sanity-check on.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D157875
Gijs for front-end bits, layout for the new CSS properties and the
removal of nsDeckFrame / nsStackLayout, Jamie and Morgan for the a11y
changes.
As discussed in the bug, the main tricky part here is handling a11y
correctly. For <deck>, that's trivial (just use `visibility: hidden` to
hide the panels visually, while removing the unselected panels from the
a11y tree).
For <tabpanels> however we need to do something special. We do want to
hide stuff visually, but we want to preserve the contents in the a11y
tree.
For that, the easiest fix is introducing a new privileged CSS property
(-moz-subtree-hidden-only-visually), which takes care of not painting
the frame, but marks stuff offscreen in the accessibility tree. This is
not intended to be a property used widely.
Other than that, the changes are relatively straight-forward, though
some of the accessible/mac changes I could get a sanity-check on.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D157875
The main issue here is that we have a dynamic change request from the
embed load. That would usually not get honored, because we're printing.
But we call into ReconstructFrames() and flush style _before_ asking to
reconstruct the document, which means that replicated fixed frames that
don't get properly cleaned-up.
This is not a correctness issue because we're about to reconstruct the
whole frame tree anyways, but the intermediate state is invalid and
caught by our assertions.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D157674
Some anonymous children are important for properly sizing their parents
even when those parents hide content with `content-visibility`. This is
shown by regressions in the proper layout of some form elements with
`content-visibility`.
This change introduces a more conservative approach for avoiding layout
of hidden content. Instead of leaving all children dirty during reflow,
reflow anonymous frames (and nsComboboxDisplayFrame, a specialized kind
of anonymous frame). This change means that frames may only lay out some
of their children, so it must introduce some more changes to assumptions
during line layout.
In addition, this change renames `content-visibility` related methods in
nsIFrame in order to make it more obvious what they do.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D157306
Some anonymous children are important for properly sizing their parents
even when those parents hide content with `content-visibility`. This is
shown by regressions in the proper layout of some form elements with
`content-visibility`.
This change introduces a more conservative approach for avoiding layout
of hidden content. Instead of leaving all children dirty during reflow,
reflow anonymous frames (and nsComboboxDisplayFrame, a specialized kind
of anonymous frame). This change means that frames may only lay out some
of their children, so it must introduce some more changes to assumptions
during line layout.
In addition, this change renames `content-visibility` related methods in
nsIFrame in order to make it more obvious what they do.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D157306
(This assert should be trivially satisfied, but nonetheless we get crash
reports that suggest we have null pointers here, so let's see...)
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D157293
This API only should never receive a null frame pointer; but we occasionally
get crash reports in this function where a null frame pointer seems to be
involved. This patch's diagnostic asserts might help us catch these crashes
slightly earlier and more directly, and might help us reason about what's going
on a bit better.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D157236
Some anonymous children are important for properly sizing their parents
even when those parents hide content with `content-visibility`. This is
shown by regressions in the proper layout of some form elements with
`content-visibility`.
This change introduces a more conservative approach for avoiding layout
of hidden content. Instead of leaving all children dirty during reflow,
reflow anonymous frames (and nsComboboxDisplayFrame, a specialized kind
of anonymous frame). This change means that frames may only lay out some
of their children, so it must introduce some more changes to assumptions
during line layout.
In addition, this change renames `content-visibility` related methods in
nsIFrame in order to make it more obvious what they do.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D156473
As per spec, see https://drafts.csswg.org/css-color-adjust/#color-scheme-effect:
> In order to preserve expected color contrasts, in the case of embedded
> documents typically rendered over a transparent canvas (such as
> provided via an HTML iframe element), if the used color scheme of the
> element and the used color scheme of the embedded document’s root
> element do not match, then the UA must use an opaque canvas of the
> Canvas color appropriate to the embedded document’s used color scheme
> instead of a transparent canvas.
After bug 1782596 we were using the preferred rather than used
color-scheme, which is the right thing to do for prefers-color-scheme,
but not for the canvas background.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D155831
Only GeckoMVMContext really needs the flush, to measure scrolled height
afterwards. Do that explicitly.
This shouldn't change behavior, for the most part; there was a preload
test that relied on the flush when changing DPI to start a run really
clean, but other than that this looks green on try.
Should at best be neutral (just code clean-up), or be a performance
improvement.
In a follow-up, we can possibly remove the DelayedResize code from the
view manager, though I need to think how to possibly coalesce the MVM
reflows, so let's not do that yet.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D155385
The code that bug 1754436 deleted checked to make sure there was a widget for the returned view, but it looks like it's possible in some edge cases to have an open popup that doesn't have a widget (most likely just for a split second). We need a widget to dispatch the event, and if it doesn't have a widget it's not visible so no point in touching it at all anyways.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D155819
Only GeckoMVMContext really needs the flush, to measure scrolled height
afterwards. Do that explicitly.
This shouldn't change behavior, for the most part; there was a preload
test that relied on the flush when changing DPI to start a run really
clean, but other than that this looks green on try.
Should at best be neutral (just code clean-up), or be a performance
improvement.
In a follow-up, we can possibly remove the DelayedResize code from the
view manager, though I need to think how to possibly coalesce the MVM
reflows, so let's not do that yet.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D155385
This still doesn't fire on print settings changes, so it uses the
default page size. Which is probably better than nothing, but...
To make viewport-size media-query listeners work more generally for
printed documents, we would need to re-clone the top document
unconditionally for all print settings changes, which needs front-end
work at least, and is dubious if the page changes dynamically.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D150499
This is far from fully perfect (specially when dealing with nested
containers, we need to be smarter when updating there), but it's
incremental progress.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D151496
This is far from fully perfect (specially when dealing with nested
containers, we need to be smarter when updating there), but it's
incremental progress.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D151496
In order to support record the last user input for touch given APZ won't
synthesize mouse event for touch in parent process. Using pointer event could
support pen input nicely, too.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D151282
In order to support record the last user input for touch given APZ won't
synthesize mouse event for touch in parent process. Using pointer event could
support pen input nicely, too.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D151282
In order to support record the last user input for touch given APZ won't
synthesize mouse event for touch in parent process. Using pointer event could
support pen input nicely, too.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D151282
