@kenpratt and I moved the URL and IFrame fields from Reflow to LayoutTask, as described in #5466.
This is my first attempt at Rust, so let me know how this is!
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: e4da29b28b6efce3f84f00ef7d2d1716954c500d
Transition events are not yet supported, and the only animatable
properties are `top`, `right`, `bottom`, and `left`. However, all other
features of transitions are supported. There are no automated tests at
present because I'm not sure how best to test it, but three manual tests
are included.
r? @glennw
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: ebdf1d494b6c986e6dfcb7d8fd3f0ffa126523ed
For the majority of these cases, `as_slice` can be removed due to
`Deref`. In particular, `Deref` for:
* `String` -> `str`
* `Atom` -> `str`
The latter of those two requires, a bump of the locked `string-cache`
library
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 0fd41847a39be387c03bd5d8b6f2aec2b1bb6f66
This is for #4704. I'm not sure if this is the best approach, so I'm open to suggestions.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 439e3150d74453b86abbcc7934b7e5152f102940
The history is now recorded per frame, but needs to be exposed in a followup PR.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 1092ca10192c79b4b96c25985a2c6245d369090b
@jdm This initial version has a few outstanding issues that I wanted to invite input on. Specifically:
1. I had some difficulty finding a home for the `StorageType` enum. Structs defined outside of the `script` module don't seem to be able to use the `#[jstraceable]` annotation and the `net` module (where `StorageTask` lives) doesn't have access to `script`. Per Simon Sapin's suggestion, I worked around this temporarily by creating a `TraceableStorageType` stand-in struct that was traceable and which could be translated into a regular `StorageType` when being sent to the `StorageTask`. Unsure of the best way to resolve this hack. Thoughts?
2. Apart from the `Storage` constructor used in `Window::SessionStorage` and the new `Window::LocalStorage`, there's also a method called `Storage::Constructor`. I'm unclear on what (if anything) will actually invoke this, so I'm not sure which variant of `StorageType` to use here. I've temporarily created an `Unknown` variant of `StorageType` as a placeholder.
3. I discovered that the web platform tests directory's localStorage tests. Many of them now pass despite the configured expectation that they fail. However, several do not pass. Is there a good way for me to add debug logging or otherwise get a sense of which assertion failed / what went wrong?
Thanks for your continued help!
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: b8e87ea020879090c931421cf3cec73d8cd1156f
This fixes some test failures that begin occurring when other events (such as resize) are fixed to only occur when needed.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 19827658deaf21eb811203f89c78a0f99e631ad4
Due to changes on Page/Window interfaces, we no longer have use for flush_layout().
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 34289943e354b2ac0e54fd1fe2d65c944f6c8e9d
Adds free/thaw methods to script_task that let you send suspend/resume messages to web content timers. Fixes#4907
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: a3ea3eed47713a4a6faa86c575bc2ac95c5fe135
I believe this problem was introduced with the mozjs error reporting changes, since we don't see errors reported from `<script>` blocks any more.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 99617557d40504060d5162739f8ba9b962843099
Ready for review.
Final link step on android fails, but we know how to fix it and will add it to this branch soon.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 2cc08f289ab909de44fa09a07b2c43b70ce379b9
This used to conflict with the util crate from the standard library, which
has long since been removed.
The import in layout has not been changed because of a conflict with the
util mod there.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 27e0f16407629422b5e047e067d458142372c97e
After this patch somebody just needs to implement the new IndexedGetter (and probably frames/length) on window to fix#4589.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: a227faa41610cdc826da4ec8d25839c2ec3061db
As a first start, this allows them indiscriminately where used.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: f74d5360ba30ec7aaa12f675eb267fd11053d8a8
This prepares for the rust upgrade currently being conducted.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: e8fac3681b690adb0796b2a807ac95bd9c13597a
This replaces the specialized TrustedXHRAddress and TrustedWorkerAddress code that was used for the same purpose. A non-zero refcount pins the given DOM object's reflector and prevents it from being GCed even when there are no other outstanding references visible to SpiderMonkey. This will enable us to implement asynchronous operations that refer to particular DOM objects (such as "queue a task to fire a simple event named load at the iframe element" from the spec) safely and conveniently, and paves the way for things like asynchronous network responses.
Some concerns about the resulting size of XHR progress messages have been expressed, but I believe optimizations to reduce that can be implemented in subsequent PRs.
r? @Ms2ger - note in particular the changes to the worker lifetime code. I couldn't figure out how to achieve an identical lifetime to the previous addref/release pairing, and I also was having trouble figuring out why the existing setup was safe. The new implementation now holds the main script task Worker object alive via the TrustedWorkerAddress field in the dedicated worker global scope, which is a significant difference.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 2c259f477c41331e66beab8bda865971982a1ff4
Now `#[dom_struct]` also generates Reflectable impls, and there's another lint to ensure that a DOM struct only contains one bare DOM field (as the first field) or a Reflector.
A lot of this was generated by sed -- each autogenerated change has its own commit for easy review; these will be squashed later.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 56d1b16d1b3a18d5ffa1d9c32562d3b209851711
I tested that it worked correctly by using running './mach run tests/html/test_timeout.html' and making sure the timers went off.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 7df37847d3a0a02da6917c669fe62a5e4af7efcd
This fixes race conditions whereby layout and script could be running
simultaneously.
r? @jdm
cc @cgaebel
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 5f2684d2f81046abd7548fb22d996d1e506a104a
Still need to impl `Activatable` on all activatable elements. I'll probably push those changes to this PR, however they can be made separately as well.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 19c69b1625dda46d3c5501292e7e2d0328e400b4
