It is possible for a PaintTask to start exiting soon after sending new
buffers to the compositor. In that case, the compositor should return
the now unnecessary buffers to the PaintTask so that it can properly
free them.
To accomplish this, the compositor now keeps a hash map of paint task
channels per pipeline id. When a PaintTask exists, the constellation
informs the compositor that it can forget about it. Additionally, the
PaintTask should not wait for any buffers when the engine is doing a
complete shutdown. In that case, the compositor is already halted and
has simply let all buffers leak. We pipe through the shutdown type when
destroying the pipeline to make this decision.
Fixes#2641.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: a31acffb0405b2c38b39c39c6d552f2ba79b6326
This is a start towards fixing #3868. Not all callers have been fixed yet, so the `Deref` implementation remains for now.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 141b5d038fad3c0c44a6f1b309b8ca9edea54580
This method is deprecated in rust master; removing its users in advance will
make a future rust upgrade smoother.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: a61417e2a87004e30e2a02f2e6ae58629062e3d5
This replaces the specialized TrustedXHRAddress and TrustedWorkerAddress code that was used for the same purpose. A non-zero refcount pins the given DOM object's reflector and prevents it from being GCed even when there are no other outstanding references visible to SpiderMonkey. This will enable us to implement asynchronous operations that refer to particular DOM objects (such as "queue a task to fire a simple event named load at the iframe element" from the spec) safely and conveniently, and paves the way for things like asynchronous network responses.
Some concerns about the resulting size of XHR progress messages have been expressed, but I believe optimizations to reduce that can be implemented in subsequent PRs.
r? @Ms2ger - note in particular the changes to the worker lifetime code. I couldn't figure out how to achieve an identical lifetime to the previous addref/release pairing, and I also was having trouble figuring out why the existing setup was safe. The new implementation now holds the main script task Worker object alive via the TrustedWorkerAddress field in the dedicated worker global scope, which is a significant difference.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 2c259f477c41331e66beab8bda865971982a1ff4
`str::to_string()` goes through a `Formatter`, `str::into_string()` is a direct copy and is apparently 5× faster.
This is a rebase of the boring and bitrot-prone parts of #4366.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 9857ea26cb9ee262654bee97322dbbf373486bff
This refs #3735. As discussed in the issue, I did it cloning when I couldn't dereference an attribute. The trait method should be on `&self` for object-safety reasons.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 194ce20969f04bf2d077ebed106fc1bfb5eb32ee
The name of the method makes it clear it's supposed to be used with a target
override, so we might as well enforce that.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 11b27361c9f6af08ed78fa1a3fe58732b4c69cd4
I have verified that back and forward work once again.
Sorry about this one. r? @jdm
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 8626be6ab00d966cb4abed2a2fef691d286df32d
I'm not sure how we want to handle Linux cursors, and GLFW has no
ability to set cursors (short of disabling it and managing it yourself).
If you test this in the wild you will probably hit #4357 until that PR lands.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: e2267e0a0749e27046ee8a26ba514cc6865e0345
This was my fault. It comes up on almost any page after scrolling a bit.
r? @jdm
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: fb5c1bef6fe48b7bd2c1dd9e73069d5b00b20aad
This fixes race conditions whereby layout and script could be running
simultaneously.
r? @jdm
cc @cgaebel
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 5f2684d2f81046abd7548fb22d996d1e506a104a
@glennw, is it possible to rebase your stuff on top of this? Sorry for the mess.
r? @metajack
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: ba06d50e3a611d1c27c6c9aa0b21441282911c3f
This prevents a crash when the script in the javascript URL accesses the
document attribute.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: ea907c1311051506bc3e7ef6fef8857968c71387
Still need to impl `Activatable` on all activatable elements. I'll probably push those changes to this PR, however they can be made separately as well.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 19c69b1625dda46d3c5501292e7e2d0328e400b4
Changes
* Implemented Storage Task
* Used Storage Task in methods of storage.rs
* Updated webstorage test expectations
Pending Changes:
* Handle Storage Event
* Throw QuotaExceededError in case of failure for method setItem
* localStorage as alias of sessionStorage
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 0d2251510fb9ad8f4974c99cadafbd1a9a81e30f
This attempts to implement a bunch of the DOM Level 3 Events spec by implementing the KeyboardEvent interface, the document focus context, and dispatching keyup/keydown/keypress events appropriately. There's also some support for multiline text input that's untested.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 2ffa845cf463b14b19322d477a77ffd20efa89a9
Instead of creating a display list for the entire page, only create one
for an area that expands around the viewport. On my machine this makes
incremental layout of http://timecube.com 50% faster.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 26045d7fcbab8851fbefe2851cd904203f8fd8dd
This fixes issue #3630
A short summary of the changes:
* Use atomic generation id to cancel inflight requests
* Handles nested calls to abort, open, send inside handlers
* Adds XHRReleaseMsg to delay freeing XHR object till all
inflight events are processed
* Handles both timeout, errors and abort/open in a symmetric fashion
i.e All inflight events will be cancelled for timeouts, aborts,
errors and on calling open.
* Change the ErroredMsg enum to be more symmetric with the returned
Error enum
I noticed a few possible changes that could make the code for fetch task simpler:
* We can remove the additional timer task and let the fetch task manage
its own timer (or maybe the resource loader can do this.)
* The CORS related steps could also be moved into the resource loader.
* Right now upload events are not support. This requires some support
from resource loader.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 4e24e4d8e92528a5a6f7bb571c6557b5bca11ea9
Instead of looking at the display tree, have ContentBox(es)Query consult
the flow tree. This allow optimizing away parts of the display tree
later. To do this we need to be more careful about how we send reflow
requests, only querying the flow tree when possible.
Fixes#3790.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: c9089c45c4b7d40419233b48a192d85a8ad71c99
Fixes#3356. This makes script elements fetch their source synchronously and execute immediately by default. It also lays some groundwork for future deferred or async script loading.
(Depends on #3716 to fix a content test failure caused by running script during parsing.)
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 272ae0cc1beb83c839d5fbd746e67f4ae746db99
...itor after the initial parse. Fixes#1720. Fixes#3738.
r? @Ms2ger or @Manishearth
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 2df236376a443d8d031ee7a72379f336f2cd8cc4
#3050
Altough LayoutDataRef is touched from layout, we don't use DOMRefCell in it becasuse
it's expected to manipulate in layout task.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: f5e8df9dac9330f2818906c471ed05f5975828c6
r? @Ms2ger, @jdm
The parser is now a JS-managed object and we use hooks in html5ever to trace its internal state. This should be memory-safe even if arbitrary JavaScript can run during a parse. Please let me know if you think of a reason it wouldn't be!
I think the likely outcome of a garbage collection during parsing is a dynamic `RefCell` borrow failure, but I'm going to look into that after this lands. It should be safe to trace the parser while it's mutably borrowed, as long as it's not shared between threads, so we can probably switch to `UnsafeCell`.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 8d3b107568ab965b518b8003b702a5db993fa7d0
This is missing a lot of parts, so it doesn't really make any real-world form submission work yet. It provides a skeleton on which the missing bits can be filled in.
What works:
- `<input>` elements except for `type=file`
- GET/POST methods
- URLencoded `enctype`s (default)
- Submission via `<form>.submit()` only
Stuff that needs to be done for most simple real-world cases to work:
- [Working text input](https://github.com/servo/servo/pull/3585)
- Click handlers for `<submit>`
- Possibly `<textarea>` support
- Support for the other two enctypes (#3649)
Todo:
- Correctly implement [planned navigation](https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/forms.html#planned-navigation) using `TrustedFormAddress` (#3648)
- [Correctly implement form owners.](https://github.com/servo/servo/issues/3553) Requires html5ever and some discussion of the spec.
- `<input type=file>` support
- Image submit support
- Browsing contexts/targets
- Support for non-`<input>` controls
- Validation (?)
- Dirname (?)
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 9dfd5e7fcd2011a411b219e8c45aadc0ecb270bd
This patch puts in the initial framework for incremental reflow. Nodes' styles
are no longer recalculated unless the node has changed.
I've been hacking on the general problem of incremental reflow for the past
couple weeks, and I've yet to get a full implementation that actually passes all
the reftests + wikipedia + cnn. Therefore, I'm going to try to land the different
parts of it one by one.
This patch only does incremental style recalc, without incremental flow
construction, inline-size bubbling, reflow, or display lists. Those will be coming
in that order as I finish them.
At least with this strategy, I can land a working version of incremental reflow,
even if not yet complete.
r? @pcwalton
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 85b277655f07db1cb99c4d3dee93804735ed0470
