Expands on the work by @wilmoz and cleans up the existing errors. Closes#7180. Closes#7111.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: e74825f9fde8e222f4ba9bb24b2c2a3864c73e5f
The failing `float-applies-to-*` CSS 2.1 tests never really should have
been passing in the first place; they depend on floats inside
fixed-layout tables working properly, which they don't.
Closes#6078.
Closes#6709.
Closes#6858.
r? @mbrubeck
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 1ddef2997abf51716835017225b282f8a9077cce
There are some bad module-level doc comments in `flow.rs` which has directly affected [Servo's docs](http://doc.servo.org/layout/flow/index.html) and so, this fixes that. Oh, and #6728 is having a hard time getting closed and so I've also removed the `FIXME` comment related to it.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: ae3aadd6567e15b5fb4da6c85fc4cdba9fcc2eb2
It's not possible to correctly determine during the css cascade whether the container height
is explicitly specified. Additionally, the spec https://drafts.csswg.org/css2/visudet.html#the-height-property says this should affect the *used* height, rather than the computed height.
This significantly improves the layout in #6643.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 028707f5cd3263fd1476669207f67d5b9d5d4806
By definition of a weak pointer, these implementations cannot be safe.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 82be491fa318f742720dc0a31f6c1b24beb57a3d
Sorry for not doing it yesterday, I couldn't.
cc @metajack @SimonSapin
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 4ebb95ccd8e034007eacb447a054919ef4af2bf7
This improves Servo's performance on large pages.
Please double-check the logic when it comes to nested layers—I'm sure I've messed up some of the geometry calculations :)
r? @glennw
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 0880e54f987bac7c34c934ef6ee36f46475b06e3
Makes qz.com visible.
In order to work around a compiler bug involving Sized, this patch moves
`store_overflow` to be a virtual method.
r? @glennw
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 5a13cae064c4418923fe35bb7e07c71f5bfd851e
This add some properties to the style system and a new flow type, but the larger issues of dealing with fragmentation in the flow tree is still an open question.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 1e150140bd12624ad357e3168fb496079fb8ec7c
They haven't been used for hypothetical box calculation in quite some
time.
r? @glennw
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 0a4db7ae0f581a959863bd5159766795c6caf8d8
Fixes#5300, which it is a rebase of.
Known issues:
* Collapsed borders do not correctly affect the border-box of the table
itself.
* The content widths of all cells in a column and the content height of
all cells in a row is the same in this patch, but not in Gecko and
WebKit.
* Corners are not painted well. The spec does not say what to do here.
* Column spans are not handled well. The spec does not say what to do
here either.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 8a4555cc53bc1bbb21a08eb6f010cb1215034419
Before this change, Servo used one code path that computed the position
of flows with `position: static` or `position: relative` and another
separate code path that computed the position of flows with `position:
absolute` or `position: fixed`. The latter code attempted to duplicate
the former code to determine the static position of hypothetical boxes,
but this was both fragile and incorrect in the case of hypothetical
boxes nested inside floats. In fact, it's impossible to determine the
static position of an absolute flow relative to its containing block at
inline-size assignment time, because that static position could depend
on a float that cannot be placed until block-size assignment!
This patch changes block layout to use the same code path for static
positioning of regular flows and static positioning of absolute flows
where applicable. This both simplifies the code and improves its
efficiency, since it allows the `hypothetical_position` field and
`static_block_offsets` data structure to be removed. Moreover, it
improves correctness in the above case (which the new reftest checks).
This allows the sidebar in Facebook Timeline to be positioned properly.
r? @glennw
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: bdcf606f4802e5b1ab3ee251b45ee1e81800359a
Cycles were being created in the flow tree since absolutely positioned
descendants had pointers to their containing blocks. This adds
WeakFlowRef (based on Weak<T>) and makes these backpointers weak
references. This also harmonizes our custom Arc<T>, FlowRef, to be
consistent with the upstream implementation.
Fixes#4915.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: f5ddbcf19fcd477dee61d6c03434ef7cfca188bf
Only simple alphabetic and numeric counter styles are supported. (This
is most of them though.)
Although this PR adds a sequential pass to layout, I verified that on
pages that contain a reasonable number of ordered lists (Reddit
`/r/rust`), the time spent in generated content resolution is dwarfed by
the time spent in the parallelizable parts of layout. So I don't expect
this to negatively affect our parallelism expect perhaps in pathological
cases.
Reconstructed from #5138 via raw diffing.
r? @SimonSapin
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: fd1bb49a65dd998c8ef9890a1576aaf62ddfdba1
...and vice-versa. This is not a complete fix for all mixed-direction layout cases, but it fixes enough problems to make some simple test cases pass, like tha attached reftest.
There are FIXME comments for many of the remaining issues. In particular, this does not yet handle RTL layout of fixed/absolute elements, nor does it completely fix the overconstrained_block reftest.
r? @SimonSapin or @pcwalton
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 2df4dd9e098671fdbe2951f6669473e7737d6ed3
Only simple alphabetic and numeric counter styles are supported. (This
is most of them though.)
Although this PR adds a sequential pass to layout, I verified that on
pages that contain a reasonable number of ordered lists (Reddit
`/r/rust`), the time spent in generated content resolution is dwarfed by
the time spent in the parallelizable parts of layout. So I don't expect
this to negatively affect our parallelism expect perhaps in pathological
cases.
Moved from #4544, because Critic.
Fixes#4544.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 5cd6316addc1acf145ed3220719387ef6ef08d2f
When executing servo with proper flags (i.e. --debug dump-flow-tree), it should print the flow tree. We had the code, but it was commented.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 2eb71bda83c175ec4af9aca4e22b74ef7fea9097
Ready for review.
Final link step on android fails, but we know how to fix it and will add it to this branch soon.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 2cc08f289ab909de44fa09a07b2c43b70ce379b9
(Still off by default. Enable with `RUST_LOG=style`.)
r? @mbrubeck
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 172aed535be3c34775824dac64ad2b91fc379ad5
This was making `box-shadow` not show up in many cases, in particular,
but the effects were not limited to that.
r? @glennw
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 499d17f564d699e5e290e8a3859f64e7536827a7
Together these improve a large number of sites: GitHub, Reddit, Wikipedia, etc.
r? @glennw
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 63a7742d834e9ed44421baa3ce218a5eabce58bf
The rendering is still wrong beause of #2795, but at least we get a rendering.
(This test change is just for readability, it should be equivalent to before.)
r? @mbrubeck
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 3cc87165a1279005fa2c12413f33487dee31df96
