Opening this PR to invite feedback.
Of the many `match` statement candidates for conversion to `if let`, several included `if` guards. Since `if let` doesn't support this syntax, I used nested if statements. If this is undesirable, say the word and I can revert those cases to `match`.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: d31e80f89490afe4863574c062f34b2a0df43bae
This used to conflict with the util crate from the standard library, which
has long since been removed.
The import in layout has not been changed because of a conflict with the
util mod there.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 27e0f16407629422b5e047e067d458142372c97e
Now `#[dom_struct]` also generates Reflectable impls, and there's another lint to ensure that a DOM struct only contains one bare DOM field (as the first field) or a Reflector.
A lot of this was generated by sed -- each autogenerated change has its own commit for easy review; these will be squashed later.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 56d1b16d1b3a18d5ffa1d9c32562d3b209851711
This patch provides some of the groundwork for column spans greater than
1. It implements the column-span CSS property as well as the
corresponding colspan attribute; although the former is not
well-specified outside of CSS multi-column layout, INTRINSIC refers to
it. Although width is distributed to spanning columns, they do not yet
contribute minimum and preferred widths; this will be implemented in a
follow-up.
The parsing for the legacy bgcolor and border attributes is
implemented according to the WHATWG HTML specification.
Additionally, this patch cleans up some miscellaneous formatting issues,
refactors layout/css somewhat to eliminate needless levels of
indirection, and cleans up the handling of table rowgroups.
New Hacker News screenshot: http://i.imgur.com/hnl2a7E.png
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 8e31e5f98747e4b42dafcc4b076fac46aeb09310
This is a grab bag of various microoptimizations for script that I came across when profiling our performance on RoboHornet.
r? @jdm
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 69f8b46f362a828ffaefe9623355bc1ad76dc5e0
This PR removes public fields from all (hope I didn't miss any) DOM structs. Should |Page| be privatized as well? This PR additionally introduces a #[privatize] lint to ensure nobody accidentally re-introduces a public field.
All changesets compile separately if applied in the same order. Hope that helps reviewing but I can of course squash them before merging.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: f350879574194bb612eac88e21d0920e9827afa7
