I've done a bit of job to get this done. Right now readback is still used, but we have a `LayerId` -> `CanvasRenderer` map on the paint task, that we can use to get rid of that.
I'd want review, to see if this is a good approach (I know it's not the initial `CanvasId` -> renderer approach, but it's pretty similar, since a canvas involves a `PaintLayer`).
I had to do a bit of refactoring to avoid cyclic dependencies between canvas and gfx. I'd want you to review them too.
It's mergeable and doesn't break any tests :P
Some of my main concerns:
* Does the canvas render really need to be behind an `Arc<Mutex<T>>`?
* I can't clone a `NativeSurface` right now (that's why the `SendNativeSurface()` msg is unimplemented in the WebGL task). It should be easy to add that to rust-layers, supposing the caller is responsible to mark it as non-leaking, any reason to not do it?
cc @jdm @pcwalton
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: ad53e95080144485e74cd9b9d48ce75e20de4e36
fixes#5724, #5737
uses https://github.com/Manishearth/rust-tenacious (can be moved in-tree if needed)
I can make it `Deny` by default too (I'll add a cargo feature to tenacious), though we might want it on
`Warn` until we get some mileage on it.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: d7987e43c944eb9b156bf3244c08fce4cb570db4
* Simpler image cache API for clients to use.
* Significantly fewer threads.
* One thread for image cache task (multiplexes commands, decoder threads and async resource requests).
* 4 threads for decoder worker tasks.
* Removed ReflowEvent hacks in script and layout tasks.
* Image elements pass a Trusted<T> to image cache, which is used to dirty nodes via script task. Previous use of Untrusted addresses was unsafe.
* Image requests such as background-image on layout / paint threads trigger repaint only rather than full reflow.
* Add reflow batching for when multiple images load quickly.
* Reduces the number of paints loading wikipedia from ~95 to ~35.
* Reasonably simple to add proper prefetch support in a follow up PR.
* Async loaded images always construct Image fragments now, instead of generic.
* Image fragments support the image not being present.
* Simpler implementation of synchronous image loading for reftests.
* Removed image holder.
* image.onload support.
* image NaturalWidth and NaturalHeight support.
* Updated WPT expectations.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: ac0645c2363b5a6ea3930b0857b3a27f1b6d033f
This implements a framework for opting in to receiving network events asynchronously. It also converts XMLHttpRequest to use them, and paves the way for better support for synchronous XHR using on-demand, targeted event loops instead of spinning the global event loop. This gives us complete feature parity with the existing XHR implementation, using fewer threads than before in the async case.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 3151497d498b001b4a783dce0595615c6fc40936
This patch adds support for setting the line cap and join. However, it seems there's a problem on the azure-side, as the line cap setting doesn't work. Changing either the default values or using the new function has no effect. Line join works fine though.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: fe81ce942a36b08ece8ef6d58de72624a961eeaa
Available markers only:
Reflow
DOMEvent
Also need to implement:
Style marker
Paint marker
Javascript marker
frames reply, depends on getting javascript stack
I decided to make pull request before implemented another markers for getting feedback.
mb it would be better to create separated tasks.
Notices:
Marker doesn't fill stack and stackEnd
MemoryActor sends fake data because there is no memory profiler per tab
FramerateActor sends empty Vec, need implement http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/dom/base/nsGlobalWindow.cpp#5240
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 74c847a17fb560dd4cd62069778776f6f06df19f
Partially fixes#5504.
Props to @ehegnes and @jdm for the help!
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 184d214e260213bafc5801af33f3031289da9361
This is for #4704. I'm not sure if this is the best approach, so I'm open to suggestions.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 439e3150d74453b86abbcc7934b7e5152f102940
@jdm This initial version has a few outstanding issues that I wanted to invite input on. Specifically:
1. I had some difficulty finding a home for the `StorageType` enum. Structs defined outside of the `script` module don't seem to be able to use the `#[jstraceable]` annotation and the `net` module (where `StorageTask` lives) doesn't have access to `script`. Per Simon Sapin's suggestion, I worked around this temporarily by creating a `TraceableStorageType` stand-in struct that was traceable and which could be translated into a regular `StorageType` when being sent to the `StorageTask`. Unsure of the best way to resolve this hack. Thoughts?
2. Apart from the `Storage` constructor used in `Window::SessionStorage` and the new `Window::LocalStorage`, there's also a method called `Storage::Constructor`. I'm unclear on what (if anything) will actually invoke this, so I'm not sure which variant of `StorageType` to use here. I've temporarily created an `Unknown` variant of `StorageType` as a placeholder.
3. I discovered that the web platform tests directory's localStorage tests. Many of them now pass despite the configured expectation that they fail. However, several do not pass. Is there a good way for me to add debug logging or otherwise get a sense of which assertion failed / what went wrong?
Thanks for your continued help!
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: b8e87ea020879090c931421cf3cec73d8cd1156f
Ready for review.
Final link step on android fails, but we know how to fix it and will add it to this branch soon.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 2cc08f289ab909de44fa09a07b2c43b70ce379b9
Now, we have many documents about dom bindings as inline comments. It's better to fuse a standalone markdown document to them.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 2c5155a119872ccdfb614c4cd5b1379de20ab595
(Still off by default. Enable with `RUST_LOG=style`.)
r? @mbrubeck
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 172aed535be3c34775824dac64ad2b91fc379ad5
This used to conflict with the util crate from the standard library, which
has long since been removed.
The import in layout has not been changed because of a conflict with the
util mod there.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 27e0f16407629422b5e047e067d458142372c97e
In particular, this contains changes to qualify enums where rust will require it, and to stop using some features that will be removed.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: ba8cf6b0e6145265f9472d4855f078d8b5943fe7
This prepares for the rust upgrade currently being conducted.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: e8fac3681b690adb0796b2a807ac95bd9c13597a
This replaces the specialized TrustedXHRAddress and TrustedWorkerAddress code that was used for the same purpose. A non-zero refcount pins the given DOM object's reflector and prevents it from being GCed even when there are no other outstanding references visible to SpiderMonkey. This will enable us to implement asynchronous operations that refer to particular DOM objects (such as "queue a task to fire a simple event named load at the iframe element" from the spec) safely and conveniently, and paves the way for things like asynchronous network responses.
Some concerns about the resulting size of XHR progress messages have been expressed, but I believe optimizations to reduce that can be implemented in subsequent PRs.
r? @Ms2ger - note in particular the changes to the worker lifetime code. I couldn't figure out how to achieve an identical lifetime to the previous addref/release pairing, and I also was having trouble figuring out why the existing setup was safe. The new implementation now holds the main script task Worker object alive via the TrustedWorkerAddress field in the dedicated worker global scope, which is a significant difference.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 2c259f477c41331e66beab8bda865971982a1ff4
This patch provides some of the groundwork for column spans greater than
1. It implements the column-span CSS property as well as the
corresponding colspan attribute; although the former is not
well-specified outside of CSS multi-column layout, INTRINSIC refers to
it. Although width is distributed to spanning columns, they do not yet
contribute minimum and preferred widths; this will be implemented in a
follow-up.
The parsing for the legacy bgcolor and border attributes is
implemented according to the WHATWG HTML specification.
Additionally, this patch cleans up some miscellaneous formatting issues,
refactors layout/css somewhat to eliminate needless levels of
indirection, and cleans up the handling of table rowgroups.
New Hacker News screenshot: http://i.imgur.com/hnl2a7E.png
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 8e31e5f98747e4b42dafcc4b076fac46aeb09310
This is the Hyper pull request, plus the set up for OpenSSL on Android to make it merge.
Sean's commits have been reviewed in #4065 (My Android changes were reviewed by Glenn)
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 6bd9bf979bcfa96ea14e666b59eab01a6d6c373e
Instead of creating a display list for the entire page, only create one
for an area that expands around the viewport. On my machine this makes
incremental layout of http://timecube.com 50% faster.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 26045d7fcbab8851fbefe2851cd904203f8fd8dd
This is a grab bag of various microoptimizations for script that I came across when profiling our performance on RoboHornet.
r? @jdm
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 69f8b46f362a828ffaefe9623355bc1ad76dc5e0
r? @Ms2ger, @jdm
The parser is now a JS-managed object and we use hooks in html5ever to trace its internal state. This should be memory-safe even if arbitrary JavaScript can run during a parse. Please let me know if you think of a reason it wouldn't be!
I think the likely outcome of a garbage collection during parsing is a dynamic `RefCell` borrow failure, but I'm going to look into that after this lands. It should be safe to trace the parser while it's mutably borrowed, as long as it's not shared between threads, so we can probably switch to `UnsafeCell`.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 8d3b107568ab965b518b8003b702a5db993fa7d0
This implements a general framework for legacy presentational attributes
to the DOM and style calculation, so that adding more of them later will
be straightforward.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 0aeecfc41d5f0c637960fcddf87cc2db3e5efeea
This patch puts in the initial framework for incremental reflow. Nodes' styles
are no longer recalculated unless the node has changed.
I've been hacking on the general problem of incremental reflow for the past
couple weeks, and I've yet to get a full implementation that actually passes all
the reftests + wikipedia + cnn. Therefore, I'm going to try to land the different
parts of it one by one.
This patch only does incremental style recalc, without incremental flow
construction, inline-size bubbling, reflow, or display lists. Those will be coming
in that order as I finish them.
At least with this strategy, I can land a working version of incremental reflow,
even if not yet complete.
r? @pcwalton
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 85b277655f07db1cb99c4d3dee93804735ed0470
