Summary:
When the host is bound to the document, it'll also re-BindToTree the shadow
tree, which will update the stylesheets and all that.
Reviewers: xidorn
Bug #: 1446507
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D742
MozReview-Commit-ID: fBLq5owB7U
Summary:
Also, make stuff sound in presence of CSSOM and what not.
The dirty: false thing is reverting an accidental change that landed in the
de-XBL stuff, which was harmless, but now wouldn't let me assert stuff properly.
Reviewers: xidorn
Bug #: 1445682
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D748
MozReview-Commit-ID: K0W2Rv0qK8X
Summary:
Before that bug, we carefully told layout about all distribution changes before
they happened, so layout could cleanup frames and styles synchronously properly
(since otherwise there's no way afterwards to figure out what the tree shape
was).
That bug made it not do it correctly, causing this.
I obviously need to write a bunch of tests for this...
Reviewers: smaug
Bug #: 1438210
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D724
MozReview-Commit-ID: 8uupNhoFwme
More improvements to come. In particular, this still iterates through Shadow DOM
in each_xbl_cascade_data, but that should be changed later. That allows to
cleanup a bunch of stuff and finally fix Shadow DOM cascade order.
We still rely on the binding parent to be setup properly in the shadow tree, but
that requirement can go away later (we can walk the containing shadow chain
instead).
This mostly focuses on removing the XBL binding from the Shadow host.
It'd be nice to do EnumerateShadowRoots faster. I think that should also be a
followup, if needed.
MozReview-Commit-ID: Jf2iGvLC5de
Also, make them not rebuild the CascadeData synchronously, via the
FlushSkinSheets call, since that's broken. That fixes bug 1413119.
This is a little step in getting rid of XBL usage for Shadow DOM.
MozReview-Commit-ID: HJ7FeUZlRTW
Now that accessing nsIContent slots is not a blob of virtual function calls, we
should be able to unify logic here, and speed up the not-so-rare case for
chrome, while keeping the usual case fast.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 87iY5Cbhx4T
This also removes some confusing comments around nsIDocument regarding some kind
of "special" stylesheets, which don't seem to exist anymore, and consolidates
StyleSheetList so that we only have one implementation.
I think that fixes a potential leak on the shadow root code (even though the API
is v0 only), given the pointer from the ShadowRootStyleSheetList to the
ShadowRoot wasn't being CCd.
Also, more stuff could be renamed, methods removed, etc, feel free to suggest
more cleanup, I've done mostly the minimal.
Next steps are moving the stylesets there and stop using the proto binding sheet
list / resources.
MozReview-Commit-ID: D9hnDgPQAS5
This also removes some confusing comments around nsIDocument regarding some kind
of "special" stylesheets, which don't seem to exist anymore, and consolidates
StyleSheetList so that we only have one implementation.
I think that fixes a potential leak on the shadow root code (even though the API
is v0 only), given the pointer from the ShadowRootStyleSheetList to the
ShadowRoot wasn't being CCd.
Also, more stuff could be renamed, methods removed, etc, feel free to suggest
more cleanup, I've done mostly the minimal.
Next steps are moving the stylesets there and stop using the proto binding sheet
list / resources.
MozReview-Commit-ID: D9hnDgPQAS5
We should consider slot as a parent in ChildIterator: if slot's
`assignedNodes` is not empty, use `assignedNodes`, otherwise, use direct
children as fallback content.
Also, GetFlattenedTreeParentNodeInternal should be changed to use
`assignedSlot` instead of `DestInsertionPoints`.
Set and unset assignedNodes properly when slot is added/removed and when
slotables are added/removed/modfied. Note that assigedNodes with
flatten: true is calculated on demand.
I'm drive-by removing the comment about the frame tree state because I looked
into it, and the answer is: we properly restore it.
The gotcha is that we retain it too much, indeed, we retain it enough that it
can leak. See bug 1397239.
MozReview-Commit-ID: LP6bXkduEZ4
