This is a best-effort thing of course, but so is the rest of the
visibility threshold stuff in practice and this should be good enough.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D98360
This removes the need for FrameForPointOptions::IsRelativeToLayoutViewport,
and makes sure each call site of these functions indicates whether the
input point/rect is in visual or layout coordinates.
Several call sites were passing in layout coordinates without setting the
IsRelativeToLayoutViewport flag, which this patch corrects.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D71705
- Add functions for traversing stylesheets in DocumentOrShadowRoot
- Add functions for unlinking stylesheets in DocumentOrShadowRoot
- Traverse and Unlink Document::mAdditionalSheets
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D72708
This removes the need for FrameForPointOptions::IsRelativeToLayoutViewport,
and makes sure each call site of these functions indicates whether the
input point/rect is in visual or layout coordinates.
Several call sites were passing in layout coordinates without setting the
IsRelativeToLayoutViewport flag, which this patch corrects.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D71705
- Remove function `Document::RemoveStyleSheet()`
- Remove function `ShadowRoot::RemoveSheet()`
- Remove function `DocumentOrShadowRoot::RemoveSheet()`, which was used by the former two functions.
- Add function `DocumentOrShadowRoot::RemoveStyleSheet()`, now uesed in all cases.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D70927
- Add functionality to clone adopted style sheets for printing.
- Add reftest to ensure that the document's adopted styles show in print.
- Add reftest to ensure that a shadow root's adopted styles show in print.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D66517
- Add functionality to clone adopted style sheets for printing.
- Add reftest to ensure that the document's adopted styles show in print.
- Add reftest to ensure that a shadow root's adopted styles show in print.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D66517
- Generalize enumeration over unique sheets to take any array of sheets.
- Add check if the new adoptedStyleSheets only appends sheets.
- Handle append case for new adoptedStyleSheets.
- Add WPT test case for duplicate sheets in the ShadowRoot.
- Add WPT test cases for appending sheets.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D64686
This also fixes some other bits, like mAdoptedStyleSheets.ElementAt(0) (which
really should be "the first applicable adopted stylesheet") and so on. Added a
test for that.
The new invariant also implies that a DocumentOrShadowRoot can't appear twice in
StyleSheet::mAdopters.
Also clears adopted stylesheets in Document::ResetStylesheetsToURI, as it's the
right thing to do (if you hit that code path with constructable sheets you'd end
up asserting, as we'd call FillStyleSetDocumentSheets after and find sheets in
there). I don't quite have a test-case for that though.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D64151
This also fixes some other bits, like mAdoptedStyleSheets.ElementAt(0) (which
really should be "the first applicable adopted stylesheet") and so on. Added a
test for that.
The new invariant also implies that a DocumentOrShadowRoot can't appear twice in
StyleSheet::mAdopters.
Also clears adopted stylesheets in Document::ResetStylesheetsToURI, as it's the
right thing to do (if you hit that code path with constructable sheets you'd end
up asserting, as we'd call FillStyleSetDocumentSheets after and find sheets in
there). I don't quite have a test-case for that though.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D64151
- Ensure that adopted styles are applied correctly to ShadowRoot
- Ensure that adopted styles are applied correctly to Document
- Add new WPT test cases to ensure the ordering of the styles.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D60083
They do the same so no reason to have it duplicated. EnsureDOMStyleSheets
doesn't have any other caller so just inline it there.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D56986
After landing bug 1517241, some lines in Document.cpp and Element.cpp depend on
`using namespace mozilla` and `using namespace mozilla::dom` of *different*
cpp files. Therefore, when you rename some cpp files in dom/base, you'll
hit compile error.
This patch fixes the dependency with moving some classes into mozilla namespace
and adding |mozilla::| or |dom::| to a couple of lines.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D15897
Summary: Really sorry for the size of the patch. It's mostly automatic
s/nsIDocument/Document/ but I had to fix up in a bunch of places manually to
add the right namespacing and such.
Overall it's not a very interesting patch I think.
nsDocument.cpp turns into Document.cpp, nsIDocument.h into Document.h and
nsIDocumentInlines.h into DocumentInlines.h.
I also changed a bunch of nsCOMPtr usage to RefPtr, but not all of it.
While fixing up some of the bits I also removed some unneeded OwnerDoc() null
checks and such, but I didn't do anything riskier than that.
Also add an IsElement check in GetElementFromPoint in the APZ code since I think
the element cast is unsound in presence of Shadow DOM.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D14355
This is on top of bug 1486623.
While at it removed the 'stale computed styles' report, since it was unused
since I removed the undisplayed maps.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D4453
This moves all the node-specific reporting to nsIDocument.
OrphanReporter delegates all the reporting to that and then returns the sum of
all sizes, which is not ideal but was pre-existing.
Also, I moved the main mStyleSheets size reporting to DocumentOrShadowRoot for
it to be shared between document and ShadowRoot.
I'll add memory reporting for the computed stylesheet maps and such in the
ShadowRoot in a followup.
I went through all the XBL bindings, though it seems I could just use
GetBindingWithContent(), since according to:
https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/rev/55da592d85c2baf8d8818010c41d9738c97013d2/dom/xbl/nsXBLBinding.cpp#615
We don't allow multiple bindings to contribute anon content. Anyway it was the
same amount of code...
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D4433
