When Unified Extensions is enabled, we want to make it so that any WebExtension browser_actions
overflow into the Unified Extensions panel instead of the default overflow panel.
Depends on D160292
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D160293
When Unified Extensions is enabled, we want to make it so that any WebExtension browser_actions
overflow into the Unified Extensions panel instead of the default overflow panel.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D160293
When Unified Extensions is enabled, we want to make it so that any WebExtension browser_actions
overflow into the Unified Extensions panel instead of the default overflow panel.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D160293
These don't work on emulated flexbox. We only have a couple of uses.
See D159726 for the diagnostic patch I used to catch these.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D159727
These don't work on emulated flexbox. We only have a couple of uses.
See D159726 for the diagnostic patch I used to catch these.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D159727
Gijs for front-end bits, layout for the new CSS properties and the
removal of nsDeckFrame / nsStackLayout, Jamie and Morgan for the a11y
changes.
As discussed in the bug, the main tricky part here is handling a11y
correctly. For <deck>, that's trivial (just use `visibility: hidden` to
hide the panels visually, while removing the unselected panels from the
a11y tree).
For <tabpanels> however we need to do something special. We do want to
hide stuff visually, but we want to preserve the contents in the a11y
tree.
For that, the easiest fix is introducing a new privileged CSS property
(-moz-subtree-hidden-only-visually), which takes care of not painting
the frame, but marks stuff offscreen in the accessibility tree. This is
not intended to be a property used widely.
Other than that, the changes are relatively straight-forward, though
some of the accessible/mac changes I could get a sanity-check on.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D157875
Gijs for front-end bits, layout for the new CSS properties and the
removal of nsDeckFrame / nsStackLayout, Jamie and Morgan for the a11y
changes.
As discussed in the bug, the main tricky part here is handling a11y
correctly. For <deck>, that's trivial (just use `visibility: hidden` to
hide the panels visually, while removing the unselected panels from the
a11y tree).
For <tabpanels> however we need to do something special. We do want to
hide stuff visually, but we want to preserve the contents in the a11y
tree.
For that, the easiest fix is introducing a new privileged CSS property
(-moz-subtree-hidden-only-visually), which takes care of not painting
the frame, but marks stuff offscreen in the accessibility tree. This is
not intended to be a property used widely.
Other than that, the changes are relatively straight-forward, though
some of the accessible/mac changes I could get a sanity-check on.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D157875
When these panels had arrows, I guess the bottomcenter topleft alignment
made sense so that you could precisely align the arrow, but that's not
what we do now.
Don't use bottomcenter / leftcenter / rightcenter, since we really want
the sides to align.
This shouldn't change behavior on any platform except Linux + Wayland,
where the alignment looks good now in the case of bug 1784876.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D156099
When these panels had arrows, I guess the bottomcenter topleft alignment
made sense so that you could precisely align the arrow, but that's not
what we do now.
Don't use bottomcenter / leftcenter / rightcenter, since we really want
the sides to align.
This shouldn't change behavior on any platform except Linux + Wayland,
where the alignment looks good now in the case of bug 1784876.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D156099
There's an infinite loop in this test in some environments, caused by
PanelMultiView's tree walker methods checking for width/height of all
focusable elements. Since the buttons in the test panel have no labels,
and in some conditions have no padding, they have 0 height, causing the
tree walker to fail to find a focusable element. The patch just gives
the buttons labels.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D147201
Instead of copying from label-* attributes, set data-l10n-id for each
notification
Also, stop using attributes for checking if the notification is supported.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D129270
To more properly support Linux having a different default at runtime.
Expose the resolved value in appinfo for convenience, and use it in the
front-end as needed.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D129004
