This will make it possible to migrate existing bindings without also needing to
mass-rewrite frontend code at the same time.
MozReview-Commit-ID: IBBqC4eeDDX
This is mostly code removal, changing GetDisplayContentsStyle(..) checks by an
FFI call to Servo.
The tricky parts are:
* MaybeCreateLazily, which I fixed to avoid setting bits under display: none
stuff. This was a pre-existing problem, which was wallpapered by the
sc->IsInDisplayNoneSubtree() check, which effectively made the whole
assertion useless (see bug 1381017 for the only crashtest that hit this
though).
* ContentRemoved, where we can no longer know for sure whether the element is
actually display: contents if we're removing it as a response to a style
change. See the comment there. That kinda sucks, but that case is relatively
weird, and it's better than adding tons of complexity to handle that.
* GetParentComputedStyle, which also has a comment there. Also, this function
has only one caller now, so we should maybe try to remove it.
The different assertions after DestroyFramesForAndRestyle are changed for a
single assertion in the function itself, and the node bit used as an
optimization to avoid hashtable lookups is taken back.
MozReview-Commit-ID: AZm822QnhF9
This will make it possible to migrate existing bindings without also needing to
mass-rewrite frontend code at the same time.
MozReview-Commit-ID: IBBqC4eeDDX
I moved the IgnoreErrors decl so it would come after the OOMReporter decl and I
could add the new conversion operator.
MozReview-Commit-ID: B1S6DXmZfvE
This allows custom elements to work in any document in the parent process that
allows XUL and XBL. The test takes the easy option of moving the existing XUL
custom element test to a run with the custom element pref disabled.
MozReview-Commit-ID: CMiLzmp60jA
This allows custom elements to work in any document in the parent process that
allows XUL and XBL. The test takes the easy option of moving the existing XUL
custom element test to a run with the custom element pref disabled.
MozReview-Commit-ID: CMiLzmp60jA
Summary: It uses two node bits that can be better suited for something else.
Reviewers: xidorn, smaug
Bug #: 1444905
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D709
MozReview-Commit-ID: HIPDtHm6xpM
If the element has throttled animations that will be affected by pending style
changes, the throttled animations will be updated though sequential tasks after
normal styling process. E.g. UpdateEffectProperties, UpdateCascadeResults etc.
So we don't need to flush them in advance of the sequential tasks.
The first test case in this patch fails without this fix.
MozReview-Commit-ID: GystAqK2bQE
Unfortunately this means that we need to export a couple more headers, but that
should be ok.
In particular, we have to export some headers that are #included by
nsCSSFrameConstructor.h, because nsCSSFrameConstructor.h itself will now be
included in more places outside of layout/, by .cpp files that don't necessarily
have the ability to indirectly #include its other headers, unless we export
them.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 2n9KHW6Yjrd
More improvements to come. In particular, this still iterates through Shadow DOM
in each_xbl_cascade_data, but that should be changed later. That allows to
cleanup a bunch of stuff and finally fix Shadow DOM cascade order.
We still rely on the binding parent to be setup properly in the shadow tree, but
that requirement can go away later (we can walk the containing shadow chain
instead).
This mostly focuses on removing the XBL binding from the Shadow host.
It'd be nice to do EnumerateShadowRoots faster. I think that should also be a
followup, if needed.
MozReview-Commit-ID: Jf2iGvLC5de
If a single element is inserted in the document, from the lazy frame
construction path we mark it as the restyle root.
It has no restyle data, and we weren't calling ClearServoData when its parent
was being removed from ClearServoDataFromSubtree, thus leaving the stale restyle
root.
MozReview-Commit-ID: GY812b8tDk0
