I got a bit carried away with fixing up consumers to use nsINode... But as a
result removing these methods all together made sense.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 2z9Q6D7GY92
(Path is actually r=froydnj.)
Bug 1400459 devirtualized nsIAtom so that it is no longer a subclass of
nsISupports. This means that nsAtom is now a better name for it than nsIAtom.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 91U22X2NydP
This patch adds an overload to nsIContentIterator::Init which accepts
RangeBoundary objects, and modifies the codepath to avoid using the offset of
the start or end nodes to construct the nsIContentIterator.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 5ZqKeiUunoN
nsIContentIterator::Init() takes nsRange but it's too expensive for some users.
So, there should be another Init() which can be specified a range in DOM tree
with 2 pairs of nsINode* and uint32_t.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 6JXic0KOM2d
DOM Standard defines that offset of Range is unsigned long. However, nsRange uses int32_t to them.
This patch makes nsRange use uint32_t instead. However, this patch does NOT allow to set over INT32_MAX as offset values since a lot of users of nsRange cannot treat the values as over INT32_MAX because a lot of internal APIs take int32_t as offsets.
For easier to search such points, this patch adds static_cast<int32_t> to uint32_t variables when they are used for int32_t arguments.
And note that nsContentUtils::ComparePoints() behaves odd. It accepts negative offset and compares such value with valid offset simply. This patch still uses int32_t offset variables in nsRange::CompareNodeToRange() even though it may be negative value if nsINode::IndexOf() returns -1 because the caller of it depends on this behavior.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 8RbOgA86JuT
