This patch makes DOMString an opaque wrapper round String (currently it's a transparent wrapper).
The changes are:
* Replacing DOMString(foo) by DOMString::from(foo).
* Replacing foo.0 by String::from(foo).
* Adding functions clear, push_str and extend for in-place mutation of DOMStrings.
* Replacing DOMString by String in other threads (devtools, storage and filereader).
* Making DOMString implement !Send.
* Removing the pub attribute from the contents of DOMString.
This enables experimenting with other string representations in the DOM.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 62acdd303b78951885c2c90747b31f318907d6c9
Changed to_string calls to to_owned calls
where was a need.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: d588ce8d8503bf0b340abfb13e2bd6a228cab900
Hi guys,
I just gave a big pass of RFC-0344 as per issue #6224 .
Pretty much renamed all the get_* fn that were used to fetch values.
I hope I didn't rename too much.
As said in the issue discussion, I didn't touch at the scripts folder so we keep the unsafe ones pretty explicit.
I've ran the whole pass of test, everything seems to be still working right :).
Please give feedback on this PR.
Thanks for looking into it.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: b05f4aa3aa3085e65cb75433ae37bf272216d033
@jdm This initial version has a few outstanding issues that I wanted to invite input on. Specifically:
1. I had some difficulty finding a home for the `StorageType` enum. Structs defined outside of the `script` module don't seem to be able to use the `#[jstraceable]` annotation and the `net` module (where `StorageTask` lives) doesn't have access to `script`. Per Simon Sapin's suggestion, I worked around this temporarily by creating a `TraceableStorageType` stand-in struct that was traceable and which could be translated into a regular `StorageType` when being sent to the `StorageTask`. Unsure of the best way to resolve this hack. Thoughts?
2. Apart from the `Storage` constructor used in `Window::SessionStorage` and the new `Window::LocalStorage`, there's also a method called `Storage::Constructor`. I'm unclear on what (if anything) will actually invoke this, so I'm not sure which variant of `StorageType` to use here. I've temporarily created an `Unknown` variant of `StorageType` as a placeholder.
3. I discovered that the web platform tests directory's localStorage tests. Many of them now pass despite the configured expectation that they fail. However, several do not pass. Is there a good way for me to add debug logging or otherwise get a sense of which assertion failed / what went wrong?
Thanks for your continued help!
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: b8e87ea020879090c931421cf3cec73d8cd1156f
This used to conflict with the util crate from the standard library, which
has long since been removed.
The import in layout has not been changed because of a conflict with the
util mod there.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 27e0f16407629422b5e047e067d458142372c97e
IntoString has been removed from Rust, and named() will take a String, so
there is no good reason to do otherwise here.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 8df0ee2bb5d40e4b22db1666982e2e5ea36513f6
Changes
* Implemented Storage Task
* Used Storage Task in methods of storage.rs
* Updated webstorage test expectations
Pending Changes:
* Handle Storage Event
* Throw QuotaExceededError in case of failure for method setItem
* localStorage as alias of sessionStorage
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 0d2251510fb9ad8f4974c99cadafbd1a9a81e30f
