Known issues:
* The caret doesn't show up if there's no text present, because we don't create text runs in that case. This should be a followup.
* Text runs don't support decomposing ligatures into their constituent subglyphs for advance computation, so the caret won't appear inside a ligature. This is a text run bug.
r? @mbrubeck
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 6cd098da302db85975d0967ddee836f04eae3bd5
Removes the long space before the site-specific drop-down in the Google SERPs.
r? @glennw
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: aeb8dce2d914808e4cdb8589d19ee9968897ed94
Elided almost all the lifetimes and removed needless returns. Mostly done by sed + manual fixes.
r? @nox
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: c2c2646d37614ece5869af861993c3d619f6e003
* The code that attempted to strip out borders that span multiple
fragments in the same element could go wrong if fragments were
stripped out due to text clumping or whitespace stripping. This patch
rewrites that code to maintain flags in the inline fragment context
specifying whether the node is the beginning or end of the element.
Not only is this easier to maintain, it's closer in spirit to what roc
originally suggested two years ago: it's isomorphic to "begin element,
end element" markers for inline layout.
* Padding and margins for spans containing inline-blocks are now
properly handled via a division of labor between the `InlineBlock`
fragment and the `BlockFlow` that represents the inline-block.
* Unscanned text fragments may not be joined together into a text run if
borders, padding, or margins separate them.
Because Servo now matches the rendering of Gecko and WebKit on the
`input_button_margins_a` reftest, I had to modify it to add some
vertical alignment.
The combined effect of all of these fixes places "Advertising" on the
right place on google.com.
r? @mbrubeck
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 8bbace7815b489e1b87df2ec496e65e78721d929
This is #7185 with one commit added to make it build merged with master, which got support for the `ch` unit in the meantime.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: a547ae6826cf171c42b090408a4c20d58d1829d9
Improves the position of the down arrows on google.com SERPs.
r? @mbrubeck
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: e46499a5dfd9189fc439c228d9a5fe23dfec0d7d
This necessitated changing overflow to be calculated by the parent flow
if relatively positioned children are present. That is because the
overflow regions cannot be calculated without knowing relative offsets,
which themselves cannot be calculated without knowing the parent size
(because of percentages). To accomplish this without sacrificing
parallelism in the non-relative case, this patch splits overflow into
"early" and "late" computation. Late overflow computation cannot be
parallelized across children, while early overflow computation can.
Makes the "Apple Music" text show up over the full-bleed promotional
background on apple.com.
r? @SimonSapin -- would appreciate a look over the iframe test case that was changed.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: dcaf66397a06246b9b4fdca3a10af1508a11f1e8
Fixes placement of the header on espn.go.com.
r? @glennw
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: a1cd27e6a3b961129fd4710513cc29e4f7c9cc67
…so that it can be activated when we're forcing
the creation of extra layers due to positioned descendants that
themselves have layers.
The newly failing tests were tests that accidentally passed due to
incorrect stacking order.
Closes#7281.
r? @mbrubeck
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 7945c174a6f90f3809a6d60f392a94e0ce10f021
Improves imgur.com and Fast Company articles.
This change made `min-height-106.htm.ini` fail because the thing it was testing
for never worked: we were relying on the incorrect stacking order of `position:
relative` to get the green square to show up.
r? @glennw
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 23657484adcbd93ee4fc5b274e2b5500a09107a6
Several issues are addressed in this commit:
* Inline flows now bubble up their absolute descendants instead of
making the inline flow the containing block for them. (In the future,
we will need to make the inline flow *sometimes* be the containing
block for them, but for now it improves sites to unconditionally
bubble up.)
* Fragments now look at their inline fragment context to determine
whether they are positioned.
* Inline flows now push the stacking-relative position of the absolute
containing block down to their inline-block fragments.
* Inline absolute hypothetical fragments can be containing blocks.
* Fixes the logic in
`containing_block_range_for_flow_surrounding_fragment_at_index`. The
condition to determine whether fragments are positioned was inverted!
* `Descendants`/`AbsDescendants` has been refactored in order to become
more friendly to inline absolute containing blocks in the future.
Improves the inline position of the green drop-down arrow in the Google
SERPs. (The block position is still wrong.)
r? @mbrubeck
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: d654841288ad6c7d4f8d7da3c68d04ef7df2c241
Expands on the work by @wilmoz and cleans up the existing errors. Closes#7180. Closes#7111.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: e74825f9fde8e222f4ba9bb24b2c2a3864c73e5f
There were two bugs here: (1) relative position applied to
scanned/unscanned text fragments independently of the container element
that applied that relative position, causing double-counting; (2)
relative position applied to inline block fragments independently of the
wrapped block itself, causing double-counting.
Closes#7067.
r? @mbrubeck
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 0bfde427e6a77d09d75b5a6e228c7b25f063395f
This patch makes Servo unconditionally strip whitespace before text run
scanning (assuming that the `white-space` property allows it). Whitespace
stripping during reflow is now only used for handling whitespace at the ends of
lines; reflow now never attempts to handle ignorable whitespace.
Many CSS tests pass now. There are some new failures, however.
The following reference tests now fail due to a pre-existing bug whereby
whitespace is used to calculate the position of inline hypothetical boxes for
elements with `display: inline; position: absolute`:
* `absolute-replaced-height-036.htm`
* `vertical-align-sub-001.htm`
* `vertical-align-super-001.htm`
The following reference tests fail due to a pre-existing bug whereby we don't
handle `font-size: 0` properly in inline reflow:
* `font-size-zero-1.htm`
* `font-size-zero-2.htm`
The following reference test fails due to the fact that it relied on our
incorrect insertion of whitespace to make room for the black background:
* `inline-formatting-context-007.htm`
r? @mbrubeck
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 7dc83e7820df43b1b617ae8dcf661398b0bd0842
Avoids a needless wrapped line in the repository name on GitHub.
r? @mbrubeck
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: da06c2dda096bd5e2a8959c102c315f9838ed465
It's not possible to correctly determine during the css cascade whether the container height
is explicitly specified. Additionally, the spec https://drafts.csswg.org/css2/visudet.html#the-height-property says this should affect the *used* height, rather than the computed height.
This significantly improves the layout in #6643.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 028707f5cd3263fd1476669207f67d5b9d5d4806
StrExt::slice_chars is deprecated and will be removed in Rust. This
lifts the implementation from Rust libstd and puts it in util::str.
This fixes a bunch of deprecation warnings in Servo.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: a54404c92180b839d2cf089d9ec9a6afe8bd5ba3
It's not quite done but can probably be reviewed anyway.
I still need to finish up a few of the ToCss impls, I just got lazy and wanted to make sure things worked.
The computation of the used values is definitely not right, I'm going to investigate that.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: acbca7b3aaf18866f7a1a79d9684149897bf4305
To actually make the multiprocess communication work, we'll need to
reroute the task creation to the pipeline or the compositor. But this
works as a first step.
r? @jdm
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 1764267379a00b96a1df89f3917299a0c6fd325c
Fixes jumpiness on lots of Web sites.
r? @mbrubeck
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: bbcd42773342a587a8515f34bdc3ca69a380c0a8
I wrote this patch that makes the test from #6542 render as expected but I am not confident it is actually the right fix. Should the padding be included in the 'ascent' metric for images, or am I just introducing a bug that happens to offset the one I'm trying to fix?
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 0688488a7fd3caee423968b33d6c19d79f94d29a
Sorry for not doing it yesterday, I couldn't.
cc @metajack @SimonSapin
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 4ebb95ccd8e034007eacb447a054919ef4af2bf7
`LOCAL_CONTEXT_KEY` is currently a `Cell<*mut LocalLayoutContext>`. The use
of the raw pointer means that the `LocalLayoutContext` is not dropped when
the thread dies; this leaks FreeType instances and probably other
things. There are also some unsafe getter functions in `LayoutContext`
(`font_context`, `applicable_declarations_cache` and
`style_sharing_candidate_cache`) that @eddyb says involve undefined
behaviour.
This changeset changes `LOCAL_CONTEXT_KEY` to
`RefCell<Option<Rc<LocalLayoutContext>>>`. This fixes the leak and also
results in safe getters.
(Fixes #6282.)
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 0dec64caf01c98d10e72b73e35b994127c23e81f
This reverts commit 945adab / PR #6033.
The CSS Working Group resolved to drop this value from the spec:
http://log.csswg.org/irc.w3.org/css/2015-05-20/#e555680
The group was unable to come up with even a theoretical use case. Gecko only implemented this value for completeness. Other browsers vendors have clearly expressed they have no interest in implementing this.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 300c36f250f7838d8008d800644dc466bcd90a72
Part of #6224
I certainly didn't remove all of them; I avoided `unsafe` areas and also `components/script`
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: f6fe1953343a417b62fb310a380af7c6973849b0
