fixes#6524. I had to make an additional change not mentioned in the ticket - adding the `#[feature]` to enable deriving custom traits but I assume that's expected at this time.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: bbb39082e0f640400546d2084a450a8675820a82
> Here it is.
>
> ~~There's two major things that are unfinished here:~~
> - ~~Dealing with the unroot_must_root lint. I'm not sure about the value of this lint with the new rooting API.~~ Done.
> - ~~Updating the Cargo.locks to point to the new SM and SM binding.~~ Done.
>
> I also included my fixes for the rust update, but these will disappear in a rebase. A rust update is necessary to support calling `Drop` on `Heap<T>` correctly when `Heap<T>` is inside a `Rc<T>`. Otherwise `&self` points to the wrong location.
>
> Incremental GC is disabled here. I'm not sure how to deal with the incremental barriers so that's left for later.
>
> Generational GC works. SM doesn't work without it.
>
> The biggest change here is to the rooting API. `Root` was made movable, and `Temporary` and `JSRef` was removed. Movable `Root`s means there's no need for `Temporary`, and `JSRef`s aren't needed generally since it can be assumed that being able to obtain a reference to a dom object means it's already rooted. References have their lifetime bound to the Roots that provided them. DOM objects that haven't passed through `reflect_dom_object` don't need to be rooted, and DOM objects that have passed through `reflect_dom_object` can't be obtained without being rooted through `native_from_reflector_jsmanaged` or `JS::<T>::root()`.
>
> Support for `Heap<T>` ended up messier than I expected. It's split into two commits, but only because it's a bit difficult to fold them together. Supporting `Heap<T>` properly requires that that `Heap::<T>::set()` be called on something that won't move. I removed the Copy and Clone trait from `Heap<T>` so `Cell` can't hold `Heap<T>` - only `UnsafeCell` can hold it.
>
> `CallbackObject` is a bit tricky - I moved all callbacks into `Rc<T>` in order to make sure that the pointer inside to a `*mut JSObject` doesn't move. This is necessary for supporting `Heap<T>`.
>
> `RootedCollectionSet` is very general purpose now. Anything with `JSTraceable` can be rooted by `RootedCollectionSet`/`RootedTraceable`. Right now, `RootedTraceable` is only used to hold down dom objects before they're fully attached to their reflector. I had to make a custom mechanism to dispatch the trace call - couldn't figure out how to get trait objects working for this case.
>
> This has been tested with the following zeal settings:
>
> GC after every allocation
> JS_GC_ZEAL=2,1
>
> GC after every 100 allocations (important for catching use-after-free bugs)
> JS_GC_ZEAL=2,100
>
> Verify pre barriers
> JS_GC_ZEAL=4,1
>
> Verify post barriers
> JS_GC_ZEAL=11,1
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: e7808c526c348fea5e3b48af70b7f1a066652097
Sorry for not doing it yesterday, I couldn't.
cc @metajack @SimonSapin
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 4ebb95ccd8e034007eacb447a054919ef4af2bf7
r? @jdm
I couldn't add the `getContextAttributes` method since `CodegenRust`
doesn't know how to return a dictionary value, I'll take a look at it ASAP.
I think the helper functions can return directly the renderer, since they're used just for that, but I wanted to hear your opinions about this.
By the way I'm interested in adding more serious tests for WebGL, and I think the [khronos conformance suit](https://github.com/KhronosGroup/WebGL/tree/master/conformance-suites/1.0.3) should be the best option.
Should I try to integrate it in wpt, or making a `tests/webgl` directory (or similar) inside the servo tree? (Maybe this question should be for @Ms2ger)
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 0de09b936e5e37c15b7865157a98ad78b1077659
I've done a bit of job to get this done. Right now readback is still used, but we have a `LayerId` -> `CanvasRenderer` map on the paint task, that we can use to get rid of that.
I'd want review, to see if this is a good approach (I know it's not the initial `CanvasId` -> renderer approach, but it's pretty similar, since a canvas involves a `PaintLayer`).
I had to do a bit of refactoring to avoid cyclic dependencies between canvas and gfx. I'd want you to review them too.
It's mergeable and doesn't break any tests :P
Some of my main concerns:
* Does the canvas render really need to be behind an `Arc<Mutex<T>>`?
* I can't clone a `NativeSurface` right now (that's why the `SendNativeSurface()` msg is unimplemented in the WebGL task). It should be easy to add that to rust-layers, supposing the caller is responsible to mark it as non-leaking, any reason to not do it?
cc @jdm @pcwalton
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: ad53e95080144485e74cd9b9d48ce75e20de4e36
This is useful for union types, in cases where we need MutNullableHeap<NodeOrString>.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: b0ddd8149b04db6bceba0c0b8de852acc1086838
GitHub doesn't allow me to reopen#5769, so I created this.
Sorry about the merge fail, my bad :/
cc/ @jdm @dmarcos
---
This PR uses customized GL context creation code, right now only working under Linux, so I expect the clearcolor test to fail on other platforms.
It addresses some other problems:
* Propagates context creation error to the top, returning null if not found.
* Uses GLContextAttributes, which will allow us to write WebGLContextAttributes easily.
* Doesn't allow a 2d context and a WebGL context coexist.
* Panics when resizing the context to larger dimensions (to be fixed soon, but better than blindly allowing it).
Removes some unused dependencies
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 9f2ad9376eaf598898387ea2c26f48c3ceb0330d
@jdm @ecoal95 I'm working on making VR happen in the Browser and I want to bring to Servo the [webVR APIs](https://github.com/MozVR/webvr-spec/blob/master/webvr.idl) we already have in Gecko. Before anything happens we need a working implementation of WebGL (and also the [fullscreen API](https://fullscreen.spec.whatwg.org/)). My implementation is very basic and probably naive (I just recently started to contribute to Servo). My patch is just a starting point:
- It only implements ```clearColor``` and ```clear``` methods of the [WebGL spec](https://www.khronos.org/registry/webgl/specs/latest/).
- It uses the readback strategy that ```canvasRenderingContext2D``` is using (The webgl task paints stuff independently on it's own buffer and the compositor task request the pixels back to the webgl task when it needs them) I'm sure there are much better ways to handle this. Latency and FPS are critical in VR so we have to figure out the fastest way to push pixels to the screen. I've read something about layerizing the canvas but I'm still not sure what that even means :)
- There's an included test you can try ```./mach run tests/ref/webgl-context/clearcolor.html```
@ecoal95 I know you'll be working on this for the next three months. With a foundation in place we will be able to make quick progress in parallel. This is exciting!
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: e4b620ea54c94e03095e4108bce94ec750416bba
Opening this PR to invite feedback.
Of the many `match` statement candidates for conversion to `if let`, several included `if` guards. Since `if let` doesn't support this syntax, I used nested if statements. If this is undesirable, say the word and I can revert those cases to `match`.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: d31e80f89490afe4863574c062f34b2a0df43bae
This used to conflict with the util crate from the standard library, which
has long since been removed.
The import in layout has not been changed because of a conflict with the
util mod there.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 27e0f16407629422b5e047e067d458142372c97e
Content of the canvas is drawn, tests/html/test_canvas.html now works.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: da400a7a453eacf6f3089cc07e5dc61f385a0909
This is a start towards fixing #3868. Not all callers have been fixed yet, so the `Deref` implementation remains for now.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 141b5d038fad3c0c44a6f1b309b8ca9edea54580
Now `#[dom_struct]` also generates Reflectable impls, and there's another lint to ensure that a DOM struct only contains one bare DOM field (as the first field) or a Reflector.
A lot of this was generated by sed -- each autogenerated change has its own commit for easy review; these will be squashed later.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 56d1b16d1b3a18d5ffa1d9c32562d3b209851711
```JSRef<Attr>``` does not require allocating a ```DOMString``` for value, which are unused in most cases. It also provides more access to ```Attr``` data.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 590a93120a26ab6ea787831d7ba08c47423148bc
75% improvement in style recalc for Guardians of the Galaxy.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 8077edc0622b04aeb26d42ced86ea285c9cac0e7
This PR removes public fields from all (hope I didn't miss any) DOM structs. Should |Page| be privatized as well? This PR additionally introduces a #[privatize] lint to ensure nobody accidentally re-introduces a public field.
All changesets compile separately if applied in the same order. Hope that helps reviewing but I can of course squash them before merging.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: f350879574194bb612eac88e21d0920e9827afa7
Now that we use `JSTraceable` (defined in `script`), we can create arbitrary implementations on non-`script` types (eg `Url` or `RequestHeaderCollection`) where in the past we had to rely on `Traceable` and `Untraceable` to achieve cross-crate impls of `Encodable`.
This removes the two completely. They can be reintroduced if required, though the `untraceable!` macro should suffice.
Fixes#3469
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: b34df7c343579f200d2e67e21fc566842a4e4a91
