Sorry for not doing it yesterday, I couldn't.
cc @metajack @SimonSapin
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 4ebb95ccd8e034007eacb447a054919ef4af2bf7
This improves Servo's performance on large pages.
Please double-check the logic when it comes to nested layers—I'm sure I've messed up some of the geometry calculations :)
r? @glennw
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 0880e54f987bac7c34c934ef6ee36f46475b06e3
This add some properties to the style system and a new flow type, but the larger issues of dealing with fragmentation in the flow tree is still an open question.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 1e150140bd12624ad357e3168fb496079fb8ec7c
Fixes#5300, which it is a rebase of.
Known issues:
* Collapsed borders do not correctly affect the border-box of the table
itself.
* The content widths of all cells in a column and the content height of
all cells in a row is the same in this patch, but not in Gecko and
WebKit.
* Corners are not painted well. The spec does not say what to do here.
* Column spans are not handled well. The spec does not say what to do
here either.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 8a4555cc53bc1bbb21a08eb6f010cb1215034419
Only simple alphabetic and numeric counter styles are supported. (This
is most of them though.)
Although this PR adds a sequential pass to layout, I verified that on
pages that contain a reasonable number of ordered lists (Reddit
`/r/rust`), the time spent in generated content resolution is dwarfed by
the time spent in the parallelizable parts of layout. So I don't expect
this to negatively affect our parallelism expect perhaps in pathological
cases.
Reconstructed from #5138 via raw diffing.
r? @SimonSapin
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: fd1bb49a65dd998c8ef9890a1576aaf62ddfdba1
Only simple alphabetic and numeric counter styles are supported. (This
is most of them though.)
Although this PR adds a sequential pass to layout, I verified that on
pages that contain a reasonable number of ordered lists (Reddit
`/r/rust`), the time spent in generated content resolution is dwarfed by
the time spent in the parallelizable parts of layout. So I don't expect
this to negatively affect our parallelism expect perhaps in pathological
cases.
Moved from #4544, because Critic.
Fixes#4544.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 5cd6316addc1acf145ed3220719387ef6ef08d2f
Ready for review.
Final link step on android fails, but we know how to fix it and will add it to this branch soon.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 2cc08f289ab909de44fa09a07b2c43b70ce379b9
(Still off by default. Enable with `RUST_LOG=style`.)
r? @mbrubeck
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 172aed535be3c34775824dac64ad2b91fc379ad5
This patch also makes Servo not crash when
`generated_containing_block_rect()` is called on a list item (as, for
example, GitHub does), and for good measure I added the fix to other
flows as well.
r? @mbrubeck
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 221a343883f510c7743908136438f5ed40bd17ed
This was making `box-shadow` not show up in many cases, in particular,
but the effects were not limited to that.
r? @glennw
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 499d17f564d699e5e290e8a3859f64e7536827a7
Instead of looking at the display tree, have ContentBox(es)Query consult
the flow tree. This allow optimizing away parts of the display tree
later. To do this we need to be more careful about how we send reflow
requests, only querying the flow tree when possible.
Fixes#3790.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: c9089c45c4b7d40419233b48a192d85a8ad71c99
This is the last PR and most of the work for the maze solver and RoboHornet.
r? @glennw
cc @cgaebel
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 035ff19e4a5995989c5fd34928af2a6690bb8062
`layout::fragment` and `layout::block` were getting too big.
r? @mrobinson
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 01f6a8102dfbb7eaef564acf8891088011905b59
This implements a general framework for legacy presentational attributes
to the DOM and style calculation, so that adding more of them later will
be straightforward.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 0aeecfc41d5f0c637960fcddf87cc2db3e5efeea
Although the computed `display` property of elements with `position:
absolute` is `block`, `position: absolute; display: inline` can still
behave differently from `position: absolute; display: block`. This is
because the hypothetical box for `position: absolute` can be at the
position it would have been if it had `display: inline`. CSS 2.1 §
10.3.7 describes this case in a parenthetical:
"The static-position containing block is the containing block of a
hypothetical box that would have been the first box of the element if
its specified 'position' value had been 'static' and its specified
'float' had been 'none'. (Note that due to the rules in section 9.7 this
hypothetical calculation might require also assuming a different
computed value for 'display'.)"
To handle this, I had to change both style computation and layout. For
the former, I added an internal property
`-servo-display-for-hypothetical-box`, which stores the `display` value
supplied by the author, before the computed value is calculated. Flow
construction now uses this value.
As for layout, implementing the proper behavior is tricky because the
position of an inline fragment in the inline direction cannot be
determined until height assignment, which is a parallelism hazard
because in parallel layout widths are computed before heights. However,
in this particular case we can avoid the parallelism hazard because the
inline direction of a hypothetical box only affects the layout if an
absolutely-positioned element is unconstrained in the inline direction.
Therefore, we can just lay out such absolutely-positioned elements with
a bogus inline position and fix it up once the true inline position of
the hypothetical box is computed. The name for this fix-up process is
"late computation of inline position" (and the corresponding fix-up for
the block position is called "late computation of block position").
This improves the header on /r/rust.
r? @glennw
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: f7d2fb6ff86afff7a5b674f751af9370a5a6b142
