Some baseline exports are context-sensitive. One example: In line-layout scenario,
the last baseline of a scroll container is always the margin-end. In other (e.g.
flex, grid) scenarios, it's the border-box clamped offset to the last line in the
container.
This enables the required 3 different behaviours for `inline-block` scroll containers
for 3 different `baseline-source` values:
- `auto`: Last baseline, margin-end
- `first`: Border-box clamped offset to the first line
- `last`: Border-box clamped offset to the last line
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D173886
Some baseline exports are context-sensitive. One example: In line-layout scenario,
the last baseline of a scroll container is always the margin-end. In other (e.g.
flex, grid) scenarios, it's the border-box clamped offset to the last line in the
container.
This enables the required 3 different behaviours for `inline-block` scroll containers
for 3 different `baseline-source` values:
- `auto`: Last baseline, margin-end
- `first`: Border-box clamped offset to the first line
- `last`: Border-box clamped offset to the last line
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D173886
Some baseline exports are context-sensitive. One example: In line-layout scenario,
the last baseline of a scroll container is always the margin-end. In other (e.g.
flex, grid) scenarios, it's the border-box clamped offset to the last line in the
container.
This enables the required 3 different behaviours for `inline-block` scroll containers
for 3 different `baseline-source` values:
- `auto`: Last baseline, margin-end
- `first`: Border-box clamped offset to the first line
- `last`: Border-box clamped offset to the last line
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D173886
Some baseline exports are context-sensitive. One example: In line-layout scenario,
the last baseline of a scroll container is always the margin-end. In other (e.g.
flex, grid) scenarios, it's the border-box clamped offset to the last line in the
container.
This enables the required 3 different behaviours for `inline-block` scroll containers
for 3 different `baseline-source` values:
- `auto`: Last baseline, margin-end
- `first`: Border-box clamped offset to the first line
- `last`: Border-box clamped offset to the last line
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D173886
This slightly simplifies gfxTextRun::BreakAndMeasureText, and should make it less confusing
to reason about trailing whitespace in nsTextFrame/nsLineLayout.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D174377
In my local testing, this seems to be harmless, but we should be alert for reports of any erratic
or poorly-rasterized text that results.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D173633
In my local testing, this seems to be harmless, but we should be alert for reports of any erratic
or poorly-rasterized text that results.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D173633
Previously, for writing-mode using central baseline alignment (i.e. `vertical-(lr|rl)`,
we simply used the center of content-box in `nsLineLayout::VerticalAlignFrames`.
However, this is incorrect for e.g. a `div` with two lines of text - just like how
its alphabetical baseline is the baseline of the second line of text, the central
baseline should be the centerline of the second line.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D172165
Previously, for writing-mode using central baseline alignment (i.e. `vertical-(lr|rl)`,
we simply used the center of content-box in `nsLineLayout::VerticalAlignFrames`.
However, this is incorrect for e.g. a `div` with two lines of text - just like how
its alphabetical baseline is the baseline of the second line of text, the central
baseline should be the centerline of the second line.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D172165
Previously, for writing-mode using central baseline alignment (i.e. `vertical-(lr|rl)`,
we simply used the center of content-box in `nsLineLayout::VerticalAlignFrames`.
However, this is incorrect for e.g. a `div` with two lines of text - just like how
its alphabetical baseline is the baseline of the second line of text, the central
baseline should be the centerline of the second line.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D172165
Although I haven't been able to reproduce the reporter's OOM crash here, I hope this will avoid
the issue; it certainly improves performance characteristics in my local build.
On the example here, my laptop happily scrolls the text field at 60fps when nothing is selected;
but if the text is selected it can only manage around 40fps, because we lose the clipping
optimization here.
With this change, it maintains 60fps regardless of whether the text is selected (or text-shadow
is present), and memory footprint is substantially reduced.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D171318
Before, there existed 3 virtual functions that calculated baselines:
- `GetLogicalBaseline`
- `GetVerticalAlignBaseline`
- `GetNaturalBaselineBOffset`
Each of them had slightly different behaviours:
- `GetLogicalBaseline` would synthesize a baseline if there is no baseline.
Others would simply return `false`.
- `GetNaturalBaselineBOffset` requires the caller to pick which of first/last
baseline to calculate. Others pick on on their own.
- `GetNaturalBaselineBOffset`'s result can be either offset from border box
start/end edge, depending on the caller-supplied baseline. Others always
return offset from border box start edge.
Now:
- `GetNaturalBaselineBOffset` is the sole virtual function.
- `GetLogicalBaseline` exists to support its use, with 2 virtual helper functions:
- `SynthesizeFallbackBaseline` to generate a baseline for elements that
doesn't have one.
- `GetBaselineSharingGroup` to preserve the default baseline picking behaviour.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D167990
With this, the old SelectionIterator that expects a per-character array of
SelectionDetails pointers is no longer used anywhere.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D170588
This significantly improves performance and reduces memory usage when painting a very long textframe
with some or all of the text selected.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D170530
For ToResolvedValue implementation purposes we wouldn't need to split
out the vertical / font / line-height arguments and we could just pass
around the ComputedStyle, but the lh unit would need that distinction,
(because computing lh on font properties should use the parent style).
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D168705
The WR text bounds are just "ink overflow without shadows", so save some
work and memory when we don't have shadows anyways.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D169573
Added WebIDL interfaces as per spec, added some necessary changes to support maplike and setlike structures to be accessed from C++.
Added `::highlight(foo)` pseudo element to CSS engine.
Implemented Highlight as new kind of `Selection` using `HighlightType::eHighlight`. This implies Selections being added/removed during runtime (one `Selection` object per highlight identifier), therefore a dynamic container for highlight `Selection` objects was added to `nsFrameSelection`. Also, the painting code queries the highlight style for highlight Selections.
Implementation is currently hidden behind a pref `dom.customHighlightAPI.enabled`.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D164203
Added WebIDL interfaces as per spec, added some necessary changes to support maplike and setlike structures to be accessed from C++.
Added `::highlight(foo)` pseudo element to CSS engine.
Implemented Highlight as new kind of `Selection` using `HighlightType::eHighlight`. This implies Selections being added/removed during runtime (one `Selection` object per highlight identifier), therefore a dynamic container for highlight `Selection` objects was added to `nsFrameSelection`. Also, the painting code queries the highlight style for highlight Selections.
Implementation is currently hidden behind a pref `dom.customHighlightAPI.enabled`.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D164203
Added WebIDL interfaces as per spec, added some necessary changes to support maplike and setlike structures to be accessed from C++.
Added `::highlight(foo)` pseudo element to CSS engine.
Implemented Highlight as new kind of `Selection` using `HighlightType::eHighlight`. This implies Selections being added/removed during runtime (one `Selection` object per highlight identifier), therefore a dynamic container for highlight `Selection` objects was added to `nsFrameSelection`. Also, the painting code queries the highlight style for highlight Selections.
Implementation is currently hidden behind a pref `dom.customHighlightAPI.enabled`.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D164203
Added WebIDL interfaces as per spec, added some necessary changes to support maplike and setlike structures to be accessed from C++.
Added `::highlight(foo)` pseudo element to CSS engine.
Implemented Highlight as new kind of `Selection` using `HighlightType::eHighlight`. This implies Selections being added/removed during runtime (one `Selection` object per highlight identifier), therefore a dynamic container for highlight `Selection` objects was added to `nsFrameSelection`. Also, the painting code queries the highlight style for highlight Selections.
Implementation is currently hidden behind a pref `dom.customHighlightAPI.enabled`.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D164203
Historically, Gecko implemented the behavior allowed by CSS2 whereby a floated ::first-letter is "boxed"
tightly around the glyph shape, rather than using constant font-ascent and -descent metrics which may
leave a lot of blank space depending whether the character has any ascender/descender or not.
However, neither webkit nor blink do this, which leads to webcompat pain when sites are constructed
assuming their behavior.
Eventually, I think we should ideally reimplement ::first-letter entirely at frame-construction time,
rather than during reflow. But in the interest of minimizing risk here, and making it easy to flip
between our existing "legacy" behavior and the new "compatible" behavior, this patch leaves the
overall implementation unchanged and just alters the metrics used for the resulting first-letter
frame.
This patch creates an integer pref layout.css.floating-first-letter.tight-glyph-bounds to allow us
to choose between three behaviors:
1: Use tight glyph bounds, and ignore line-height; the baseline of the floated letter automatically
adjusts to wrap text around the "ink box" of the glyph. This is the existing Gecko behavior.
0: Don't use tight glyph bounds, respect line-height: the floated letter acts like a normal <span>
with float positioning; baseline position and vertical size are based on font metrics but not
the specific shape of the individual glyph. This gives a similar result to webkit/blink.
-1: Automatically choose between (1) and (0) based on heuristics to try and detect whether the page
was written with the webkit/blink behavior (0) in mind; specifically, if there is a line-height
of less than 1em, or a negative block-start margin, we assume the author was trying to eliminate
excess blank space that behavior (0) tends to produce, and so we use that model.
Initially, this patch leaves the behavior unchanged for Beta/Release builds, but enables option -1 (use
heuristics to choose which layout model to apply) on Nightly so we can see how that works in practice.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D165008
Historically, Gecko implemented the behavior allowed by CSS2 whereby a floated ::first-letter is "boxed"
tightly around the glyph shape, rather than using constant font-ascent and -descent metrics which may
leave a lot of blank space depending whether the character has any ascender/descender or not.
However, neither webkit nor blink do this, which leads to webcompat pain when sites are constructed
assuming their behavior.
Eventually, I think we should ideally reimplement ::first-letter entirely at frame-construction time,
rather than during reflow. But in the interest of minimizing risk here, and making it easy to flip
between our existing "legacy" behavior and the new "compatible" behavior, this patch leaves the
overall implementation unchanged and just alters the metrics used for the resulting first-letter
frame.
This patch creates an integer pref layout.css.floating-first-letter.tight-glyph-bounds to allow us
to choose between three behaviors:
1: Use tight glyph bounds, and ignore line-height; the baseline of the floated letter automatically
adjusts to wrap text around the "ink box" of the glyph. This is the existing Gecko behavior.
0: Don't use tight glyph bounds, respect line-height: the floated letter acts like a normal <span>
with float positioning; baseline position and vertical size are based on font metrics but not
the specific shape of the individual glyph. This gives a similar result to webkit/blink.
-1: Automatically choose between (1) and (0) based on heuristics to try and detect whether the page
was written with the webkit/blink behavior (0) in mind; specifically, if there is a line-height
of less than 1em, or a negative block-start margin, we assume the author was trying to eliminate
excess blank space that behavior (0) tends to produce, and so we use that model.
Initially, this patch leaves the behavior unchanged for Beta/Release builds, but enables option -1 (use
heuristics to choose which layout model to apply) on Nightly so we can see how that works in practice.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D165008
