Ready for review.
Final link step on android fails, but we know how to fix it and will add it to this branch soon.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 2cc08f289ab909de44fa09a07b2c43b70ce379b9
(Still off by default. Enable with `RUST_LOG=style`.)
r? @mbrubeck
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 172aed535be3c34775824dac64ad2b91fc379ad5
This was making `box-shadow` not show up in many cases, in particular,
but the effects were not limited to that.
r? @glennw
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 499d17f564d699e5e290e8a3859f64e7536827a7
This patch provides some of the groundwork for column spans greater than
1. It implements the column-span CSS property as well as the
corresponding colspan attribute; although the former is not
well-specified outside of CSS multi-column layout, INTRINSIC refers to
it. Although width is distributed to spanning columns, they do not yet
contribute minimum and preferred widths; this will be implemented in a
follow-up.
The parsing for the legacy bgcolor and border attributes is
implemented according to the WHATWG HTML specification.
Additionally, this patch cleans up some miscellaneous formatting issues,
refactors layout/css somewhat to eliminate needless levels of
indirection, and cleans up the handling of table rowgroups.
New Hacker News screenshot: http://i.imgur.com/hnl2a7E.png
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 8e31e5f98747e4b42dafcc4b076fac46aeb09310
I had to use a somewhat unconventional method of computing text
indentation (propagating from blocks down to inlines) because of the way
containing blocks are handled in Servo.
(As a side note, neither Gecko nor WebKit correctly handles percentages
in `text-align`, at least incrementally -- i.e. when the percentages are
relative to the viewport and the viewport is resized.)
r? @SimonSapin
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: be6612193786ef22810fd66b3ce244a7e66cbcf4
By "idempotent" I mean that later passes do not stomp on data from
earlier passes, so that we can run the passes individually for
incremental reflow. The main change here was to stop overwriting the
"minimum inline-size" field of each column with the column's computed
inline-size.
r? @mbrubeck
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 909dd0e80f5c6a9051da6e2f70d77186cc545b1a
Attempt to solve #3690
I've re-rolled the changes from https://github.com/servo/servo/pull/2610, and then doen the necessary updates to get this to compile with the current snapshot of rust.
The documentation for values I've added in the bitflag are missing, because I don't know what is the appropriate text.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: e13873bba1782580db4abe46e883b08da829cbb6
Instead of looking at the display tree, have ContentBox(es)Query consult
the flow tree. This allow optimizing away parts of the display tree
later. To do this we need to be more careful about how we send reflow
requests, only querying the flow tree when possible.
Fixes#3790.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: c9089c45c4b7d40419233b48a192d85a8ad71c99
This is the last PR and most of the work for the maze solver and RoboHornet.
r? @glennw
cc @cgaebel
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 035ff19e4a5995989c5fd34928af2a6690bb8062
These were showing up really high in the maze solver profile.
r? @glennw
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 9f248378f06d4de7c0df01b64e93edcc4de208cf
...n-optimized, debug build of mozjs and rust-mozjs. Update the Cargo snapshot to enable new feature support.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: e100a1834f40599952a790d2537d2b1262585e82
`layout::fragment` and `layout::block` were getting too big.
r? @mrobinson
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 01f6a8102dfbb7eaef564acf8891088011905b59
This also enables incremental reflow by default. \o/
r? @pcwalton
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: f6941b35e3b945f4a6dcd2cf03daa345ad2bcaed
http://dbaron.org/css/intrinsic/
Column spans are not yet supported.
This effectively adds support for percentage widths, and it also fixes
many bugs, improving the layout of Google and Wikipedia.
r? @SimonSapin
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: e2d7777c41135b71293c195d2a9d7a1bc2afd0ca
This implements a general framework for legacy presentational attributes
to the DOM and style calculation, so that adding more of them later will
be straightforward.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 0aeecfc41d5f0c637960fcddf87cc2db3e5efeea
This makes layout more idempotent, which is important for incremental
layout.
Also converts `is_root` to a set of flags and fixes a `TODO` concerning
percentage inline heights of images.
r? @glennw
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 7902ccf8507a7ec31515bfb5824dc4727564fe4d
Although the computed `display` property of elements with `position:
absolute` is `block`, `position: absolute; display: inline` can still
behave differently from `position: absolute; display: block`. This is
because the hypothetical box for `position: absolute` can be at the
position it would have been if it had `display: inline`. CSS 2.1 §
10.3.7 describes this case in a parenthetical:
"The static-position containing block is the containing block of a
hypothetical box that would have been the first box of the element if
its specified 'position' value had been 'static' and its specified
'float' had been 'none'. (Note that due to the rules in section 9.7 this
hypothetical calculation might require also assuming a different
computed value for 'display'.)"
To handle this, I had to change both style computation and layout. For
the former, I added an internal property
`-servo-display-for-hypothetical-box`, which stores the `display` value
supplied by the author, before the computed value is calculated. Flow
construction now uses this value.
As for layout, implementing the proper behavior is tricky because the
position of an inline fragment in the inline direction cannot be
determined until height assignment, which is a parallelism hazard
because in parallel layout widths are computed before heights. However,
in this particular case we can avoid the parallelism hazard because the
inline direction of a hypothetical box only affects the layout if an
absolutely-positioned element is unconstrained in the inline direction.
Therefore, we can just lay out such absolutely-positioned elements with
a bogus inline position and fix it up once the true inline position of
the hypothetical box is computed. The name for this fix-up process is
"late computation of inline position" (and the corresponding fix-up for
the block position is called "late computation of block position").
This improves the header on /r/rust.
r? @glennw
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: f7d2fb6ff86afff7a5b674f751af9370a5a6b142
