Also causes removing a pref to take effect immediately, and prevents
losing all color pref overrides when the theme changes.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D44416
This is much easier than the existing ResizeReflowIgnoreOverride function, and
this will allow me to avoid flushing if needed (we already kinda do that
already with the "suppressResizeReflow" thing), which in turn allows me to
consolidate a bunch of the logic for resizes.
The function should be much easier to follow:
* Set the new viewport (async, doesn't do any work).
* Invalidate layout as needed due to the viewport change (that is, resize hint
for the root frame, and invalidate isizes if needed). Also async and doesn't
do any reflowing itself.
* Flush layout / do the reflowing all at once. I think we can stop doing this
much more often now, but that's follow-up work.
Depends on D43798
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D43799
Also causes removing a pref to take effect immediately, and prevents
losing all color pref overrides when the theme changes.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D44416
This avoids doing wasted work and sending spurious resize
events if this case would be hit.
In practice, it cannot be hit yet, I think, because
callers do check for this and bail out earlier. But
there's no assertion to that respect so this shouldn't
hurt.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D43798
Collect telemetry for the number of pending style and layout flush requests per
flush and the number of style and layout flushes per nsRefreshDriver::Tick. A
style flush reports only style requests, but a layout flush reports style and
layout requests since flushing layout implies a style flush also.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D40756
Converts font.size.systemFontScale to a static pref. Removes the function in nsLayoutUtils and does the float division directly in PresShell.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D41824
Converts font.size.inflation.forceEnabled and font.size.inflation.disabledInMasterProcess to static prefs. Like previous revisions, I retained the member variables in PresShell and set them to the static prefs.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D41664
Converts font.size.inflation.lineThreshold varcache pref to a static pref. Like previous revisions, this retains the member variable in PresShell.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D41662
Converts font.size.inflation.minTwips, font.size.inflation.emPerLine, and font.size.inflation.mappingIntercept to static prefs and removes their associated functions from nsLayoutUtils. There are associated member variables in PresShell, but since documentation specified that these variables are set specifically to prevent changes to the cache from being read until page reload, I made the decision to leave these and set them to the static prefs.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D41656
This also renames the existing infallible nsDocShell:GetBrowsingContext()
getter to BrowsingContextRef(), and changes the return type, since several
callers rely on it returning a raw pointer rather than an already_AddRefed.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D40312
This requires replacing inclusions of it with inclusions of more specific prefs
files.
The exception is that StaticPrefsAll.h, which is equivalent to StaticPrefs.h,
and is used in `Codegen.py` because doing something smarter is tricky and
suitable for a follow-up. As a result, any change to StaticPrefList.yaml will
still trigger recompilation of all the generated DOM bindings files, but that's
still a big improvement over trigger recompilation of every file that uses
static prefs.
Most of the changes in this commit are very boring. The only changes that are
not boring are modules/libpref/*, Codegen.py, and ServoBindings.toml.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D39138
This is what other browsers do, and it does make sense to me, it's useless to
try to scroll a frame with no scroll range in a given direction.
I think all callers of this function should be treated like this, so this is
more like a RFC / feedback request than a patch per se.
The wheel handling code already checks scroll range, so there's no difference of
behavior in that case, if I'm reading the code right.
There are a few other functions that check the result of
GetPerceivedScrollingDirections(), but I think if we change this we should
change this consistently.
I also think that if we do this we should rename the method to something like
GetAvailableScrollingDirections() or such.
Anyhow, wdyt? I should also add a test for this if we go with this.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D38991
This is what other browsers do, and it does make sense to me, it's useless to
try to scroll a frame with no scroll range in a given direction.
I think all callers of this function should be treated like this, so this is
more like a RFC / feedback request than a patch per se.
The wheel handling code already checks scroll range, so there's no difference of
behavior in that case, if I'm reading the code right.
There are a few other functions that check the result of
GetPerceivedScrollingDirections(), but I think if we change this we should
change this consistently.
I also think that if we do this we should rename the method to something like
GetAvailableScrollingDirections() or such.
Anyhow, wdyt? I should also add a test for this if we go with this.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D38991
We shouldn't have a frame and a null root frame. This assertion failing is the
only way to get this to happen.
So assert it a bit harder so that we can hopefully find a way to repro it and
thus figure out what the right thing to do is. If it legitimately fails, chances
are we shouldn't be putting this function on PresShell in the first place.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D39124
This is what other browsers do, and it does make sense to me, it's useless to
try to scroll a frame with no scroll range in a given direction.
I think all callers of this function should be treated like this, so this is
more like a RFC / feedback request than a patch per se.
The wheel handling code already checks scroll range, so there's no difference of
behavior in that case, if I'm reading the code right.
There are a few other functions that check the result of
GetPerceivedScrollingDirections(), but I think if we change this we should
change this consistently.
I also think that if we do this we should rename the method to something like
GetAvailableScrollingDirections() or such.
Anyhow, wdyt? I should also add a test for this if we go with this.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D38991
Currently it's completely unclear at use sites that the getters for `once`
static prefs return the pref value from startup, rather than the current pref
value. (Bugs have been caused by this.) This commit improves things by changing
the getter name to make it clear that the pref value obtained is from startup.
This required changing things within libpref so it distinguishes between the
"base id" (`foo_bar`) and the "full id" (`foo_bar` or
`foo_bar_DoNotUseDirectly` or `foo_bar_AtStartup` or
`foo_bar_AtStartup_DoNotUseDirectly`; the name used depends on the `mirror` and
`do_not_use_directly` values in the YAML definition.) The "full id" is used in
most places, while the "base id" is used for the `GetPrefName_*` and
`GetPrefDefault_*` functions.
(This is a nice demonstration of the benefits of the YAML file, BTW. Making
this change with the old code would have involved adding an entry to every
single pref in StaticPrefList.h.)
The patch also rejigs the comment at the top of StaticPrefList.yaml, to clarify
some things.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D38604
Seems we can leave this node alive for too long if the user scrolls between
domcontentloaded (where GoToAnchor is called) and onload (where ScrollToAnchor()
is called).
Though it seems we can leave it for too long if we don't end up calling
ScrollToAnchor(), the documentation of the method claims that it's cleared
unconditionally.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D38398
browserElement_ScrollEvent.js is affected by this change. Before this change
the document for iframe mozbrowser was not considered as the root content
document, but after this change, it's considered as the root content document.
Given the nature of iframe mozbrowser, I believe it's the right behavior.
The browser mochitest in this commit fails without this change since
the minimum-scale size is used in the out-of-process iframe so that the visual
viewport size gets 3x bigger than the expected size.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D36547
I missed in bug 1487216 that the pres arena memory reporting assumes that the
entry indices are frame class ids, which means that we're reporting some display
list arena entries as frames, which is obviously wrong.
Cleanup a bit nsPresArena to remove the custom id concept, and report also
individual display item type memory usage.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D35368
We should also check IsRootContentDocumentCrossProcess instead of
IsRootContentDocument there, it will be fixed in bug 1562505.
The test case in this commit is almost copied-n-pasted from
helper_scroll_into_view_bug1516056.html.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D36556
This simplifies dealing with frames that are pushed/pulled between
continuations during reflow, allows us to avoid the complexity of the
fix to 1459937, and hopefully fixes some of the regressions from bug
1308876.
This disables the changes from bug 1459937 by commenting out a single
line in ReparentFrameInternal in nsBlockFrame.cpp, but all the added
code will be removed in the following patch.
Co-authored-by: Gerald Squelart <gsquelart@mozilla.com>
Co-authored-by: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
Depends on D36423
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D36424
Some `nsRange` static methods are useful in `StaticRange` and some of them
are used in a lot of places but not related to `nsRange` directly. This
patch moves them into new static method only class, `mozilla::RangeUtils`.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D35142
This is pretty much the same as ScrollStyles::IsSmoothScroll right now,
but in the next commit, we will no longer propagate scroll-behavior on <body> to
the root element so that nsIScrollableFrame::IsSmoothScroll will be changed
to reflect it.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D35737
