This makes it easier to understand and will make it easier to not include 'extra' frames (as we're hoping they will coalesce with the original frame on the compositor).
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D113736
This makes it easier to understand and will make it easier to not include 'extra' frames (as we're hoping they will coalesce with the original frame on the compositor).
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D113736
`High` priority is being used for vsync tasks, so we should rename it to
make it clear, and renaming it also makes our priority naming less
confusing.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D109536
This is the second of two patches in this series that removes a large amount of now dead code from dom/plugins as part of removing all NPAPI plugin support.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D107150
`High` priority is being used for vsync tasks, so we should rename it to
make it clear, and renaming it also makes our priority naming less
confusing.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D109536
This is the second of two patches in this series that removes a large amount of now dead code from dom/plugins as part of removing all NPAPI plugin support.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D107150
I can't see a reason to overwrite the most recent refresh time of the driver with a timestamp at which we didn't tick (no tests seem to depend on it), and we need to not do this in order to be able to tell later on if we've ticked this driver for the current timer's tick.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D109690
When a contentful paint occurs which doesn't come from Tick, we should
not generate a first-contentful-paint entry for it because
1) It violates the spec
2) It usually means some magical paints which we should not expose
to the web.
So this patches stop generating a contentful paint entry for that,
instead asking the next tick to generate the entry.
Depends on D107858
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D107859
This fixes a bunch of regressions:
- a wrong calculation in `GetIdleDeadlineHint()`, leading to pageload
regressions.
- in certain situations we'd use `StartupRefreshDriverTimer` instead
of `VsyncRefreshDriverTimer` when initializing timers early
- unnecessary use of `BrowserChild` on backends that don't opt for
per-browser-child vsync - i.e. all but Wayland.
This is partly done by reverting to pre-1645528 behaviour, although
with some code simplifications.
FTR: I also played with some more radical changes, but given the
complexity of the code involved I found the regression potential too
big. Thus this is the most conservative solution I could come up with.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D100471
This fixes a bunch of regressions:
- a wrong calculation in `GetIdleDeadlineHint()`, leading to pageload
regressions.
- in certain situations we'd use `StartupRefreshDriverTimer` instead
of `VsyncRefreshDriverTimer` when initializing timers early
- unnecessary use of `BrowserChild` on backends that don't opt for
per-browser-child vsync - i.e. all but Wayland.
This is partly done by reverting to pre-1645528 behaviour, although
with some code simplifications.
FTR: I also played with some more radical changes, but given the
complexity of the code involved I found the regression potential too
big. Thus this is the most conservative solution I could come up with.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D100471
To allow `requestAnimationFrame()` and similar things to run at monitor
speed if there is only a window-specific vsyncsource available.
This is the case for Wayland and, in the future, EGL/X11. Other backends
may opt for window specific vsyncsources as well at some point.
The idea is to, instead of using global vsync objects, expose a vsyncsource
from nsWindow and use it for refresh drivers. For the content process, move
VsyncChild to BrowserChild, so for each Browserchild there is only one
VsyncChild to which all refresh drivers connect.
IPC in managed either by PBrowser or PBackground. Right now, PBrowser is
only used on Wayland, as both PBrowser and the Wayland vsyncsource run
on the main thread. Other backends keep using the background thread for
now.
While at it, make it so that we constantly update the refresh rate. This
is necessary for Wayland, but also on other platforms variable refresh rates
are increasingly common. Do that by transimitting the vsync rate `SendNotify()`.
How to test:
- run the Wayland backend
- enable `widget.wayland_vsync.enabled`
- optionally: disable `privacy.reduceTimerPrecision`
- run `vsynctester.com` or `testufo.com`
Expected results:
Instead of fixed 60Hz, things should update at monitor refresh rate -
e.g. 144Hz
Original patch by Kenny Levinsen.
Depends on D98254
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D93173
To allow `requestAnimationFrame()` and similar things to run at monitor
speed if there is only a window-specific vsyncsource available.
This is the case for Wayland and, in the future, EGL/X11. Other backends
may opt for window specific vsyncsources as well at some point.
The idea is to, instead of using global vsync objects, expose a vsyncsource
from nsWindow and use it for refresh drivers. For the content process, move
VsyncChild to BrowserChild, so for each Browserchild there is only one
VsyncChild to which all refresh drivers connect.
IPC in managed either by PBrowser or PBackground. Right now, PBrowser is
only used on Wayland, as both PBrowser and the Wayland vsyncsource run
on the main thread. Other backends keep using the background thread for
now.
While at it, make it so that we constantly update the refresh rate. This
is necessary for Wayland, but also on other platforms variable refresh rates
are increasingly common. Do that by transimitting the vsync rate `SendNotify()`.
How to test:
- run the Wayland backend
- enable `widget.wayland_vsync.enabled`
- optionally: disable `privacy.reduceTimerPrecision`
- run `vsynctester.com` or `testufo.com`
Expected results:
Instead of fixed 60Hz, things should update at monitor refresh rate -
e.g. 144Hz
Original patch by Kenny Levinsen.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D93173
To allow `requestAnimationFrame()` and similar things to run at monitor
speed if there is only a window-specific vsyncsource available.
This is the case for Wayland and, in the future, EGL/X11. Other backends
may opt for window specific vsyncsources as well at some point.
The idea is to, instead of using global vsync objects, expose a vsyncsource
from nsWindow and use it for refresh drivers. For the content process, move
VsyncChild to BrowserChild, so for each Browserchild there is only one
VsyncChild to which all refresh drivers connect.
IPC in managed either by PBrowser or PBackground. Right now, PBrowser is
only used on Wayland, as both PBrowser and the Wayland vsyncsource run
on the main thread. Other backends keep using the background thread for
now.
While at it, make it so that we constantly update the refresh rate. This
is necessary for Wayland, but also on other platforms variable refresh rates
are increasingly common. Do that by transimitting the vsync rate `SendNotify()`.
How to test:
- run the Wayland backend
- enable `widget.wayland_vsync.enabled`
- optionally: disable `privacy.reduceTimerPrecision`
- run `vsynctester.com` or `testufo.com`
Expected results:
Instead of fixed 60Hz, things should update at monitor refresh rate -
e.g. 144Hz
Original patch by Kenny Levinsen.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D93173
To allow `requestAnimationFrame()` and similar things to run at monitor
speed if there is only a window-specific vsyncsource available.
This is the case for Wayland and, in the future, EGL/X11. Other backends
may opt for window specific vsyncsources as well at some point.
The idea is to, instead of using global vsync objects, expose a vsyncsource
from nsWindow and use it for refresh drivers. For the content process, move
VsyncChild to BrowserChild, so for each Browserchild there is only one
VsyncChild to which all refresh drivers connect.
IPC in managed either by PBrowser or PBackground. Right now, PBrowser is
only used on Wayland, as both PBrowser and the Wayland vsyncsource run
on the main thread. Other backends keep using the background thread for
now.
While at it, make it so that we constantly update the refresh rate. This
is necessary for Wayland, but also on other platforms variable refresh rates
are increasingly common. When using PVsync, limit updates to once in every
250ms in order to minimize overhead while still updating fast.
How to test:
- run the Wayland backend
- enable `widget.wayland_vsync.enabled`
- optionally: disable `privacy.reduceTimerPrecision`
- run `vsynctester.com` or `testufo.com`
Expected results:
Instead of fixed 60Hz, things should update at monitor refresh rate -
e.g. 144Hz
Original patch by Kenny Levinsen.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D93173
To allow `requestAnimationFrame()` and similar things to run at monitor
speed if there is only a window-specific vsyncsource available.
This is the case for Wayland and, in the future, EGL/X11. Other backends
may opt for window specific vsyncsources as well at some point.
The idea is to, instead of using global vsync objects, expose a vsyncsource
from nsWindow and use it for refresh drivers. For the content process, move
VsyncChild to BrowserChild, so for each Browserchild there is only one
VsyncChild to which all refresh drivers connect.
IPC in managed either by PBrowser or PBackground. Right now, PBrowser is
only used on Wayland, as both PBrowser and the Wayland vsyncsource run
on the main thread. Other backends keep using the background thread for
now.
While at it, make it so that we constantly update the refresh rate. This
is necessary for Wayland, but also on other platforms variable refresh rates
are increasingly common. When using PVsync, limit updates to once in every
250ms in order to minimize overhead while still updating fast.
How to test:
- run the Wayland backend
- enable `widget.wayland_vsync.enabled`
- optionally: disable `privacy.reduceTimerPrecision`
- run `vsynctester.com` or `testufo.com`
Expected results:
Instead of fixed 60Hz, things should update at monitor refresh rate -
e.g. 144Hz
Original patch by Kenny Levinsen.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D93173
To allow `requestAnimationFrame()` and similar things to run at monitor
speed if there is only a window-specific vsyncsource available.
This is the case for Wayland and, in the future, EGL/X11. Other backends
may opt for window specific vsyncsources as well at some point.
The idea is to, instead of using global vsync objects, expose a vsyncsource
from nsWindow and use it for refresh drivers. For the content process, move
VsyncChild to BrowserChild, so for each Browserchild there is only one
VsyncChild to which all refresh drivers connect.
IPC in managed either by PBrowser or PBackground. Right now, PBrowser is
only used on Wayland, as both PBrowser and the Wayland vsyncsource run
on the main thread. Other backends keep using the background thread for
now.
While at it, make it so that we constantly update the refresh rate. This
is necessary for Wayland, but also on other platforms variable refresh rates
are increasingly common. When using PVsync, limit updates to once in every
250ms in order to minimize overhead while still updating fast.
How to test:
- run the Wayland backend
- enable `widget.wayland_vsync.enabled`
- optionally: disable `privacy.reduceTimerPrecision`
- run `vsynctester.com` or `testufo.com`
Expected results:
Instead of fixed 60Hz, things should update at monitor refresh rate -
e.g. 144Hz
Original patch by Kenny Levinsen.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D93173
