This change also renames several related functions, as well as fields,
and the header is moved into EXPORTS.mozilla given it is defined under
mozilla namespace.
MozReview-Commit-ID: LqCdcW8fmUN
Generally there isn't really much difference for painting on html/body
element vs. viewport, so it's probably not worth finer grained control
over when we should propagate and when not.
MozReview-Commit-ID: HK7DsQdz41D
The applying change hints are the same as what we apply for transform style
changed from something to 'none'.
All test cases pass with this fix fail without the fix.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 7HStU26lRPq
This builds on bug 1428676 and introduces StyleAppearance, which replaces the
NS_THEME_* constants.
Really sorry for the size of the patch.
There's a non-trivial change in the gtk theme, which I submitted separately as
bug 1478385.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D2361
MozReview-Commit-ID: DiSmMWK7Krp
Using references helps to see when stuff can and cannot be null.
I removed useless aTag / aNamespaceId arguments which are useless now that XBL
can't override them (bug 1450617), so FindXULData is the only one that keeps
them alive.
Also, I took the liberty of renaming a few fooComputedStyle variables to just
fooStyle, and clarify naming in some pseudo-element-related functions to say
originating element (the spec term) and avoid confusing it with the generated
_moz_generated_content_before / _moz_generated_content_after element.
Note that this is a partial state, more stuff will come in the future.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D2326
MozReview-Commit-ID: 39B30doREUH
Continuations do not have placeholders. There's a bunch of code that already
deals with that in other places in the tree.
MozReview-Commit-ID: Htizql7692e
Just avoid crashing if the element has no data, treat is as display: none.
TakeChangeHint already returns wasRestyled = false, so we won't end up trying to
reconstruct anything, and we don't set frame construction flags in
nsCSSFrameConstructor so we won't traverse children either.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 2gXmHSlj3Jw
To avoid creating a bunch of layers when we don't need to, this
tracks when a frame needs to be repainted, and invalidates the
IsStyleAnimated logic around mRestyleCounts if the frame is also
being invalidated.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 5Q96Cx6f3V0
The next changeset is going to move over more annotations that Gecko developers
would count as "layout" into the LAYOUT category, and which is currently marked
as GRAPHICS.
We can add a subcategory for style resolution once we have subcategories, but
for now I think it makes more sense to put style resolution into the same bucket
as reflow and display list building.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 7r9eICVBA1Z
The next changeset is going to move over more annotations that Gecko developers
would count as "layout" into the LAYOUT category, and which is currently marked
as GRAPHICS.
We can add a subcategory for style resolution once we have subcategories, but
for now I think it makes more sense to put style resolution into the same bucket
as reflow and display list building.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 7r9eICVBA1Z
The next changeset is going to move over more annotations that Gecko developers
would count as "layout" into the LAYOUT category, and which is currently marked
as GRAPHICS.
We can add a subcategory for style resolution once we have subcategories, but
for now I think it makes more sense to put style resolution into the same bucket
as reflow and display list building.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 7r9eICVBA1Z
CSS animations / transitions and element.animate animations of opacity will
still be treated as animations.
JS-implemented opacity animations will no longer be detected as animations.
I hope that's fine. The current heuristic makes us detect opacity 'animations'
in lots of cases where there isn't an actual animation, and the resulting
layerization changes from those detected animations cause expensive repaints.
MozReview-Commit-ID: KJlc6c8OWSP
Now that BeginUpdate is useless for the UPDATE_STYLE case, we don't need the
update mechanism at all. Just ensure that ApplicableStylesChanged is called on
the pres shell via the relevant RuleChanged, etc. notifications.
There's a big hidden gotcha here. nsIDocument::BeginUpdate does put a script
blocker on the stack for these updates. However it's not needed, since no script
can run during these notifications (only the stylesheet events we post for
devtools, but those use AsyncEventDispatcher and PostDOMEvents, so they don't
try to run immediately).
nsIDocument::BeginUpdate also does XBL binding attached queue stuff, but we
can't change bindings during these notifications anyway, so it also doesn't
matter.
MozReview-Commit-ID: HJvK6zQfloh
We may no longer know what the right parent style is, and it's not like it
matters anyway, the frame tree under us is dead, including placeholders and such
holding from us.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 1RHTwvKy0zQ
This method is not a virtual call, and also looks nicer.
This patch was mostly generated by a Python script, but I manually
cleaned up the code in a few places where statements didn't need to be
split across multiple lines any more.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 8JExxqSRc59
Much in the spirit of bug 1442207.
They're not only unneeded, and cheap to get, but also we call them
inconsistently with the light DOM and flattened tree parent (like ContentRemoved
for display: contents), so they're really confusing, and kind of a footgun.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 9u3Kp8Kpp5i
This patch basically does:
* remove StyleSetHandle and its corresponding files
* revisit #includes of related header files and change correspondingly
* change nsIPresShell::mStyleSet to be UniquePtr<ServoStyleSet>
* change the creating path of ServoStyleSet to pass UniquePtr
* change other mentions of StyleSetHandle to ServoStyleSet*
* remove AsServo() calls on ServoStyleSet
Some unfortunate bits:
* some methods of (Servo)StyleSet only accepts ServoStyleSheet while
many places call into the methods with StyleSheet, so there are many
->AsServo() added to sheets
MozReview-Commit-ID: K4zYnuhOurA
-Wmissing-prototypes is a new optional warning available in clang ToT. It warns about global functions that have no previous function declaration (e.g. from an #included header file). These functions can probably be made static (allowing the compiler to better optimize them) or they may be unused.
Confusingly, clang's -Wmissing-prototypes is equivalent to gcc's -Wmissing-declarations, not gcc's -Wmissing-prototypes. A function prototype is a function declaration that specifies the function's argument types. C++ requires that all function declarations specify their argument types, but C does not. As such, gcc's -Wmissing-prototypes is a C-only warning about C functions that have no previous function *prototypes* (with argument types), even if a previous function *declaration* (without argument types) was seen.
MozReview-Commit-ID: FGKVLzeQ2oK
Deletion at the end of a text-node ends up translated to an empty append. It's
harmless though.
Reviewers: xidorn
Bug #: 1442506
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D667
MozReview-Commit-ID: DqheOYVWx8o
This unfortunately doesn't fix my test-case (because we're replacing the text
content all the time and all that), but it's still worth it, since it fixes the
case we care about (the parser appending).
We could also optimize pure insertions (since in that case we can still figure
out what the old text was), but it's probably annoying and not worth the churn.
In any case, we cannot optimize anything that resembles any kind of removal,
because from there we don't know the old text in any way (and the text nodes
like to reuse string buffers and such).
We could do two other optimizations to replace / extend this one, in that order:
* Pass the buffer and length to CharacterDataWillChange, and use that to get
the exact old text and the new one in RestyleManager. That would make the
optimization exact.
* Pass some sort of Maybe<bool> mWasWhitespace down the CharacterDataChangeInfo
which is computed like:
HasFlag(NS_CACHED_TEXT_IS_ONLY_WHITESPACE)
? Some(NS_TEXT_IS_ONLY_WHITESPACE)
: Nothing()
It's not clear to me it's going to be completely worth the churn, so I haven't
done those yet, if we see code in the wild which resembles my testcase, we can
think of doing it.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 2rTWaZti8rv
We used to do it this way effectively until I fixed it in bug 1400936.
Per the list of fuzz bugs that bug has in the "Depends on" field, some of those
without a super-clear fix, and others that aren't listed in there, and all the
complexity we had to deal with while receiving restyle requests mid-unbind, etc,
I think this is the right call.
This clears data on RestyleManager::ContentRemoved for non-anonymous nodes, and
on UnbindFromTree for subtrees rooted at anonymous nodes.
This will hopefully yield enforceable invariants.
MozReview-Commit-ID: IMwX5Uh1apv
We used to do it this way effectively until I fixed it in bug 1400936.
Per the list of fuzz bugs that bug has in the "Depends on" field, some of those
without a super-clear fix, and others that aren't listed in there, and all the
complexity we had to deal with while receiving restyle requests mid-unbind, etc,
I think this is the right call.
This clears data on RestyleManager::ContentRemoved for non-anonymous nodes, and
on UnbindFromTree for subtrees rooted at anonymous nodes.
This will hopefully yield enforceable invariants.
MozReview-Commit-ID: IMwX5Uh1apv
